Conceptualizing Digital Teaching Competence in TVET Occupational Authenticity, Safety and Institutional Readiness in Malaysian Technical Higher Education

Existing digital competence frameworks offer useful accounts of the capabilities educators need for technology-supported teaching. Their direct application to technical and vocational education and training (TVET), however, should not be assumed. Occupational learning requires educators to determine when a digital representation can adequately support learning, when physical performance remains indispensable, how digitally mediated activities may affect workshop safety, and whether institutional conditions allow technology to be implemented responsibly. Against this background, the paper examines the conceptual foundations underpinning MyDigCompTVET, a digital teaching competency framework developed for TVET educators in Malaysia. The empirical development of the framework is reported separately; the concern of this paper is to explain what makes digital teaching competence distinctive across classrooms, laboratories, workshops, simulations and workplaces. An integrative conceptual synthesis was undertaken using established educator-competence frameworks, complementary theoretical perspectives, selected vocational education studies and relevant Malaysian policy documents. The sources were examined through an extraction matrix that compared their principal constructs, assumptions about teaching environments, treatment of practical performance and implications for TVET. This comparison brought three recurring tensions into view: digitalization and occupational authenticity, innovation and physical safety, and individual capability and institutional readiness. Together, these tensions provide a basis for interpreting the five domains incorporated within MyDigCompTVET: Digital Knowledge; Digital Skills; Professional Development and Lifelong Learning; Digital Ethics and Readiness; and Technology Integration in TVET. The paper argues that technology integration in TVET is fundamentally an exercise of professional judgement rather than a matter of technology use alone. It also distinguishes educators’ capabilities from the organizational conditions under which those capabilities are enacted, thereby avoiding the attribution of institutional limitations to individual competence. The paper’s contribution lies in clarifying the conceptual reasoning underpinning MyDigCompTVET and identifying considerations relevant to its interpretation, implementation and subsequent validation within Malaysian technical higher education.

Digital Teaching Competence; TVET Educators; Occupational Authenticity; Workshop Safety; Institutional Readiness; MyDigCompTVET

1. Antonietti, C., Cattaneo, A., & Amenduni, F. (2022). Can teachers' digital competence influence technology acceptance in vocational education? Computers in Human Behavior, 132, 107266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107266 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Cattaneo, A. A. P., Antonietti, C., & Rauseo, M. (2022). How digitalised are vocational teachers? Assessing digital competence in vocational education and looking at its underlying factors. Computers & Education, 176, 104358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104358 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Economic Planning Unit. (2021). Malaysia digital economy blueprint. Prime Minister's Department, Malaysia. https://www.ekonomi.gov.my/sites/default/files/2021-02/malaysia-digital-economy-blueprint.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Gudmundsdottir, G. B., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2018). Newly qualified teachers' professional digital competence: Implications for teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(2), 214-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1416085 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ilomäki, L., Paavola, S., Lakkala, M., & Kantosalo, A. (2016). Digital competence - an emergent boundary concept for policy and educational research. Education and Information Technologies, 21, 655-679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9346-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. International Society for Technology in Education. (2017). ISTE standards for educators. https://iste.org/standards/educators [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Review, 10, 18-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2023). Digital education policy. Ministry of Education Malaysia. https://www.moe.gov.my/dasarmenu/dasar-pendidikan-digital [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. National TVET Council Secretariat. (2024). National TVET policy 2030. Prime Minister's Department, Malaysia. https://www.tvet.gov.my/MTVET_DASAR_TVET_NEGARA_2030.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Redecker, C., & Punie, Y. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Roll, M. J. J., & Ifenthaler, D. (2021). Learning factories 4.0 in technical vocational schools: Can they foster competence development? Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 13, Article 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-021-00124-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Sailer, M., Murböck, J., & Fischer, F. (2021). Digital learning in schools: What does it take beyond digital technology? Teaching and Teacher Education, 103, 103346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103346 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3-10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. UNESCO. (2018). UNESCO ICT competency framework for teachers (Version 3). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265721 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. UNESCO. (2022). UNESCO strategy for technical and vocational education and training 2022-2029: Transforming TVET for successful and just transitions. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000383360 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. World Economic Forum. (2025). The future of jobs report 2025. https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2025/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study