Counterfeit Alcohol as a National Security Threat in Kenya: Kiambu County Case Study

Counterfeit alcohol remains a growing concern in many developing economies, yet its implications extend beyond public health and economic losses to broader questions of national security. This study examines counterfeit potable spirits as a security threat in Kenya, drawing on evidence from Kiambu County. The analysis is grounded in securitization theory, institutional theory, and counterfeit market theory to explain how illicit alcohol markets evolve and persist despite regulatory frameworks. A mixed-methods approach was adopted, combining survey data from 312 respondents with qualitative interviews involving consumers, traders, enforcement officers, and regulatory officials. The study assessed market availability, identification capacity, perceived trends, pricing dynamics, health impacts, revenue losses, and links to organized crime, alongside an evaluation of institutional and regulatory responses. Findings indicate widespread availability of counterfeit alcohol, with 86% of respondents confirming its presence in local markets. A majority of respondents (78%) perceive a rising trend over the past five years, while 57% report an inability to distinguish counterfeit from genuine products. The study further finds strong perceived links to adverse health outcomes (90%), government revenue loss (87%), and organized criminal networks (80%). Institutional analysis reveals moderate but inconsistent enforcement effectiveness, constrained by coordination gaps, uneven capacity, and corruption risks. The study concludes that counterfeit alcohol in Kenya constitutes a multidimensional national security threat, simultaneously undermining human security, fiscal stability, and institutional legitimacy. Its persistence is driven not only by market incentives but also by structural weaknesses in enforcement systems and fragmented governance responses. The findings contribute to securitization debates by demonstrating how illicit consumer goods can escalate into security concerns in contexts of regulatory fragmentation. Policy implications point to the need for integrated enforcement systems, strengthened institutional coordination, and demand-side interventions to disrupt sustained market demand.

Counterfeit alcohol, national security, organized crime, illicit trade, enforcement, Kenya

1. Akingbade, T., & Adebayo, S. (2020). Informal alcohol markets and regulatory challenges in Africa. Journal of Public Health Policy, 41(3), 245–260. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Anti-Counterfeit Authority. (2023). Annual report on counterfeit goods in Kenya. Government of Kenya. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. European Union Intellectual Property Office, & Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). Global trade in fake goods: Trade in counterfeit and pirated products. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Fink, C., Maskus, K. E., & Qian, Y. (2016). The economic effects of counterfeit trade. World Bank Economic Review, 30(Supplement 1), S139–S155. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhw014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Gathogo, J., & Mwaura, P. (2019). Illicit alcohol markets and public health risks in Kenya. African Journal of Criminology and Justice Studies, 12(2), 88–105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Havocscope. (2019). Illicit alcohol trade statistics and global trends. https://www.havocscope.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Kamala, R. (2017). Counterfeit goods in emerging markets: Consumer vulnerability and regulatory gaps. International Journal of Trade and Policy, 4(1), 33–47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. National Authority for the Campaign Against Alcohol and Drug Abuse. (2022). Alcohol and drug abuse in Kenya: National status report. Government of Kenya. https://nacada.go.ke [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, & European Union Intellectual Property Office. (2021). Global trade in fake goods: Trade in counterfeit and pirated products. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). Governance challenges in combating illicit trade. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2020). Transnational organized crime and illicit markets. United Nations. https://www.unodc.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2021). Organized crime and illicit trade convergence. United Nations. https://www.unodc.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Wanjohi, J. (2019). Consumer awareness and counterfeit detection in informal markets. Journal of Consumer Studies, 11(4), 201–214. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. World Health Organization. (2018). Global status report on alcohol and health. WHO Press. https://www.who.int [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar