Criminology Students’ Perspectives on Police Involvement in Cockfighting: Ethical, Legal, and Public Perception Dimensions
Authors
College of Criminology, Misamis University, Oroquieta City (Philippines)
College of Criminology, Misamis University, Oroquieta City (Philippines)
College of Criminology, Misamis University, Oroquieta City (Philippines)
College of Criminology, Misamis University, Oroquieta City (Philippines)
College of Criminology, Misamis University, Oroquieta City (Philippines)
Article Information
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-03-09
Accepted: 2026-03-14
Published: 2026-03-31
Abstract
Police participation in culturally significant yet legally prohibited activities, such as cockfighting, poses critical ethical and institutional challenges in law enforcement. This study examined the lived experiences and perceptions of criminology students regarding police involvement in cockfighting, a practice that remains culturally embedded yet legally and ethically contested in the Philippine context. Using a qualitative phenomenological design, the research explored how students interpreted the relationship between cultural traditions, ethical obligations, and law enforcement conduct. Data were gathered through face-to-face semi-structured interviews with twelve criminology students enrolled in a private higher education institution in Misamis Occidental. The interviews were analyzed using Colaizzi’s seven-step method to extract significant statements, formulate meanings, and develop thematic clusters. The analysis revealed four major themes: (1) weakening of public trust and police credibility; (2) violations of ethical standards and conflicts of interest; (3) legal consequences and weak law enforcement implementation; and (4) cultural normalization of cockfighting and its influence on public perceptions. Findings indicated that although cockfighting is often socially accepted as a traditional activity, participants consistently emphasized that police officers are expected to uphold ethical and legal standards regardless of cultural practices. Police participation in such activities was perceived to compromise professional integrity, weaken public confidence, and challenge the legitimacy of law enforcement institutions. The study concludes that police involvement in culturally significant yet legally restricted practices undermines public trust, exposes persistent ethical and legal tensions, and highlights the need for professional integrity in policing. It is recommended that police institutions strengthen ethics-oriented training, enhance accountability mechanisms, and integrate cultural sensitivity instruction within criminology and law enforcement education to prepare future officers to navigate complex socio-cultural contexts without compromising ethical or legal standards.
Keywords
cockfighting; police ethics; police legitimacy; cultural traditions and law enforcement
Downloads
References
1. Aguirre, A., & Santos, M. R. (2021). Police integrity and conflicts of interest in law enforcement: Implications for accountability and public trust. Policing: An International Journal, 44(6), 1051–1066. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-02-2021-0029 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Aragunde, U., & Kohl, A. G. (2025). Banning cockfighting in Puerto Rico: Assessing public support and opposition to animal fighting prohibitions. Social Problems. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spaf064 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Basco-Galangco, R. B., & Chinayo, D. L. (2022). The state of police legitimacy through the people’s trust and satisfaction in the performance of the police of their duties. American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Innovation, 1(6), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajmri.v1i6.872 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Cunningham, B. (2025). Cockfighting as Recreational Violence in Leinster, Ireland: 1849–1900 (Doctoral dissertation, Open Research Newcastle). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Dela Cruz, J. P., & Ramos, L. A. (2022). Cultural traditions and the enforcement of animal welfare laws in Southeast Asia. Asian Journal of Criminology, 17(4), 345–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-022-09366-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Hoffman, K., & Richey, S. (2021). The moral authority of police: Ethical behavior, legitimacy, and public confidence in law enforcement institutions. Journal of Criminal Justice, 74, 101785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2021.101785 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Intravia, J., Wolff, K. T., Piquero, A. R., & Johnson, C. (2021). Public perceptions of the police during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from a national survey. Policing and Society, 31(7), 815–833. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2020.1823474 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Jones, D. J., Moule, R. K., & Rydberg, J. (2023). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Police misconduct, legitimacy, and public trust in law enforcement: A contemporary assessment. Policing and Society, 33(6), 699–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2022.2091752 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Kochel, T. R., Parks, R., & Mastrofski, S. D. (2021). Examining police legitimacy and public cooperation with law enforcement. Police Quarterly, 24(2), 173–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/10986111211001630 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Kutnjak Ivković, S., & Haberfeld, M. R. (2022). Police integrity and ethics: Challenges and opportunities in contemporary policing. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 16(2), 456–470. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paab062 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Nix, J., & Wolfe, S. E. (2020). Sensitivity to the Ferguson effect: The role of managerial organizational justice. Police Quarterly, 23(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611119846914 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Oliveira, C., et al. (2025). Medical veterinary expertise on a case of cockfighting in Brazil. Forensic Science International: Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsir.2025.100426 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Pósch, K., Jackson, J., Bradford, B., & MacQueen, S. (2023). Measuring normative obligation to obey the police: An empirical assessment of a new police legitimacy scale. Journal of Criminal Justice, 86, 102045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2023.102045 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Setiawan, E. A., Bakir, H., & Nurdin, B. (2023). Law enforcement responses to cockfighting gambling: Challenges in policing illegal animal fighting. Edunity: Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan, 2(5), 453–462. https://doi.org/10.57096/edunity.v2i5.47 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Tankebe, J., Reisig, M. D., & Wang, X. (2021). A multidimensional model of police legitimacy: Evidence from cross-cultural research. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 58(1), 3–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427820938067 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Yesberg, J. A., & Bradford, B. (2021). Police legitimacy and public cooperation with law enforcement: The role of procedural justice. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 21(3), 353–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895820914387 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
- Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
- The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
- An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
- The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.