Crisis Communication and Cross-Border Legal Accountability: Protecting and Restoring Brand Image in the Age of Digital Misinformation

Digital misinformation has altered the conditions under which organizations identify, communicate, and recover from reputational crises. False claims can circulate before an organization has established the underlying facts, while manipulated audio, video, and images can make false attribution appear credible. This article examines the communication and legal problems that arise when such narratives cross national borders. It combines crisis communication theory with an analytical review of literature on misinformation, deepfakes, social media, correction, corporate reputation, and digital influence, alongside a conceptual examination of cross-border jurisdiction and platform regulation. The analysis is qualitative and does not claim statistical generalization. Instead, it synthesizes published research and illustrative cases to develop an operational framework consisting of four connected stages: Detect, Assess, Respond, and Recover. The framework treats legal review as an integrated part of crisis management rather than as a step that begins only after public communication has occurred. The analysis indicates that monitoring technology can improve the speed with which emerging narratives are identified, but high-risk decisions still require human verification, contextual judgment, and a documented evidentiary basis. It also shows that cross-border crises cannot be managed through a single communication rule because jurisdiction, applicable law, platform obligations, and stakeholder expectations may differ across countries. The article contributes a practical link between communication theory and legal analysis by specifying where legal questions enter the crisis process and by identifying areas that require future empirical testing.

crisis communication; brand image; corporate reputation; misinformation; deepfakes

1. S. Vosoughi, D. Roy, and S. Aral, “The spread of true and false news online,” Science, vol. 359, no. 6380, pp. 1146-1151, 2018, doi: 10.1126/science.aap9559. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. N. Grinberg, K. Joseph, L. Friedland, B. Swire-Thompson, and D. Lazer, “Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election,” Science, vol. 363, no. 6425, pp. 374-378, 2019, doi: [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. 1126/science.aau2706. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. M. Mustak, J. Salminen, M. Mäntymäki, A. Rahman, and Y. K. Dwivedi, “Deepfakes: Deceptions, mitigations, and opportunities,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 154, p. 113368, 2023, doi: [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. 1016/j.jbusres.2022.113368. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. K. Nuortimo, J. Harkonen, and K. Breznik, “Exploring corporate reputation and crisis communication,” Journal of Marketing Analytics, vol. 14, pp. 4-25, 2026, doi: 10.1057/s41270-024-00353-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. J. Udry and S. J. Barber, “The illusory truth effect: A review of how repetition increases belief in misinformation,” Current Opinion in Psychology, vol. 56, p. 101736, 2024, doi: [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. 1016/j.copsyc.2023.101736. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. V. Vellani, S. Zheng, D. Ercelik, and T. Sharot, “The illusory truth effect leads to the spread of misinformation,” Cognition, vol. 236, p. 105421, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105421. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. G. Pennycook and D. G. Rand, “The psychology of fake news,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 388-402, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. W. T. Coombs, “Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of Situational Crisis Communication Theory,” Corporate Reputation Review, vol. 10, pp. 163-176, 2007, doi: 10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550049. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. W. T. Coombs and S. J. Holladay, “Helping crisis managers protect reputational assets: Initial tests of the Situational Crisis Communication Theory,” Management Communication Quarterly, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 165-186, 2002, doi: 10.1177/089331802237233. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. W. L. Benoit, “Image repair discourse and crisis communication,” Public Relations Review, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 177-186, 1997, doi: 10.1016/S0363-8111(97)90023-0. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. A. Elgueta-Ruiz, G. Sadi, G. Gonçalves, and J. Martínez-Ortiz, “Meta-research on crisis communication: 24 years of research in Public Relations Review (2000-2023),” Public Relations Review, vol. 52, no. 2, p. 102685, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2026.102685. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Y. Cheng, “How social media is changing crisis communication strategies: Evidence from the updated literature,” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 58-68, 2018, doi: 10.1111/1468-5973.12130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. K. D. Sweetser and colleagues, “Social media dialogues in a crisis: A mixed-methods approach to identifying publics on social media,” Public Relations Review, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 562-573, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.07.005. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. L. M. Arpan and D. Pompper, “Stormy weather: Testing ‘stealing thunder’ as a crisis communication strategy to improve communication flow between organizations and journalists,” Public Relations Review, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 291-308, 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0363-8111(03)00043-2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. S. Lee, “Stealing thunder as a crisis communication strategy in the digital age,” Business Horizons, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 801-810, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2020.07.006. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. A.-S. Claeys and V. Cauberghe, “Crisis response and crisis timing strategies, two sides of the same coin,” Public Relations Review, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 83-88, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.09.001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. F. Schultz, S. Utz, and A. Göritz, “Is the medium the message? Perceptions of and reactions to crisis communication via Twitter, blogs and traditional media,” Public Relations Review, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 20-27, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.12.001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. J. Xu, “Does the medium matter? A meta-analysis on using social media vs. traditional media in crisis communication,” Public Relations Review, vol. 46, no. 4, p. 101947, 2020, doi: [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. 1016/j.pubrev.2020.101947. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. S. R. Veil, T. Buehner, and M. J. Palenchar, “A work-in-process literature review: Incorporating social media in risk and crisis communication,” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 110-122, 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5973.2011.00639.x. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. A. Hassan and S. J. Barber, “The effects of repetition frequency on the illusory truth effect,” Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, vol. 6, p. 38, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00301-5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. J. Udry, S. K. White, and S. J. Barber, “The effects of repetition spacing on the illusory truth effect,” Cognition, vol. 225, p. 105157, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105157. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. E. L. Henderson, S. J. Westwood, and D. J. Simons, “A reproducible systematic map of research on the illusory truth effect,” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol. 29, pp. 1065-1088, 2022, doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01995-w. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. E. K. Vraga, L. Bode, and M. Tully, “Creating news literacy messages to enhance expert corrections of misinformation on Twitter,” Communication Research, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 229-251, 2022, doi: [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. 1177/0093650219898094. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. F. Stoeckel, S. Stöckli, B. Ceka, C. Ricchi, B. Lyons, and J. Reifler, “Social corrections act as a double-edged sword by reducing the perceived accuracy of false and real news in the UK, Germany, and Italy,” Communications Psychology, vol. 2, p. 10, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00057-w. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. J. Singh, B. Crisafulli, L. T. Quamina, and M. T. Xue, “‘To trust or not to trust’: The impact of social media influencers on the reputation of corporate brands in crisis,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 119, pp. 464-480, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.039. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Z. Olbermann and H. Schramm, “Brand-related social media influencers as spokespersons after a corporate greenwashing crisis: Implications of parasocial interactions and wishful identification on the perception of the brand image,” Public Relations Review, vol. 51, no. 4, p. 102612, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2025.102612. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. L. Hagen, T. Keller, S. Neely, N. DePaula, and C. Robert-Cooperman, “Crisis communications in the age of social media: A network analysis of Zika-related tweets,” Social Science Computer Review, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 523-541, 2018, doi: 10.1177/0894439317721985. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. S.-Y. Kim and J.-H. Lee, “How to maximize the effectiveness of stealing thunder in crisis communication: The significance of follow-up actions and transparent communication,” Corporate Communications: An International Journal, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 425-440, 2022, doi: 10.1108/CCIJ-04-2021-0047. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. J. Tække, “Crisis communication and social media: A systems- and medium-theoretical perspective,” Systems Research and Behavioral Science, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 182-194, 2017, doi: 10.1002/sres.2451. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Y. Li and N. Kapucu, “Determinants of the use of social media in crisis communication: An analysis of microblogging by Chinese local government,” International Journal of Public Administration, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 100-114, 2025, doi: 10.1080/01900692.2024.2316130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. S. Hong and B. Kim, “Exploring social media use in university crisis communication: An experiment to measure impact on perceived crisis severity and attitudes of key publics,” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, vol. 27, pp. 61-71, 2019, doi: 10.1111/1468-5973.12242. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. S. Hong, B. Kim, and S. Y. Lee, “A public health crisis in the university: Impact of crisis response strategies on universities’ transparency and post-crisis relationships during COVID-19 pandemic,” Public Relations Review, vol. 49, no. 1, p. 102287, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2023.102287. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. J. W. M. Verhoeven, J. J. Van Hoof, H. Ter Keurs, and M. Van Vuuren, “Effects of apologies and crisis responsibility on corporate and spokesperson reputation,” Public Relations Review, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 501-504, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.02.002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. A.-S. Claeys, V. Cauberghe, and P. Vyncke, “Restoring reputations in times of crisis: An experimental study of the Situational Crisis Communication Theory and the moderating effects of locus of control,” Public Relations Review, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 256-262, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.05.004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. S. Kim, E. J. Avery, and R. W. Lariscy, “Are crisis communicators practicing what we preach? An evaluation of crisis response strategy analyzed in public relations research from 1991 to 2009,” Public Relations Review, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 446-448, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.08.002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. L. Zhou and J.-H. Shin, “Does stealing thunder always work? A content analysis of crisis communication practice under different cultural settings,” Public Relations Review, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1036-1047, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.08.004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. A.-S. Claeys, V. Cauberghe, and J. Leysen, “Implications of stealing thunder for the impact of expressing emotions in organizational crisis communication,” Journal of Applied Communication Research, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 293-308, 2013, doi: 10.1080/00909882.2013.806991. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. G. Burel, “Exploring the impact of automated correction of misinformation in social media,” AI Magazine, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 227-245, 2024, doi: 10.1002/aaai.12180. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. W. T. Coombs, “Situational Crisis Communication Theory: Refining and clarifying a cognitive-based theory of crisis communication,” in The Handbook of Crisis Communication, 2022, doi: 10.1002/9781119678953.ch14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. W. T. Coombs, “Attribution Theory as a guide for post-crisis communication research,” Public Relations Review, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 135-139, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.11.016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. J.-J. Kuipers, “Towards a European approach in the cross-border infringement of personality rights,” German Law Journal, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 1681-1706, 2011, doi: 10.1017/S2071832200017491. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. S. Sakolciová, “Defamation on social media: Challenges of private international law,” Bratislava Law Review, vol. 5, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.46282/blr.2021.5.1.226. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. R. Ó Fathaigh, D. Buijs, and J. van Hoboken, “The regulation of disinformation under the Digital Services Act,” Media and Communication, vol. 13, Art. 9615, 2025, doi: 10.17645/mac.9615. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Z. Hajnal, “The new liability forms of online platforms in the new European digital legal framework from the consumers’ perspective,” Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Legal Studies, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 19-35, 2023, doi: 10.47745/AUSLEG.2023.12.2.02. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• LeafQuest: A Mobile-Based Augmented Reality for Plant Placement, Discovery, and Growth
• Participatory Ergonomic Intervention Approach on Musculoskeletal Disorder (MSD) in Construction Sectors: A Systematic Review
• Integrating GIS into Traffic Incident Management: A Web-Based System
• RideSmart: A Personalized Motorcycle Product Recommendation System Using TF-IDF and Descriptive Analytics for Javidson Motorshop
• Educational Technology Course Design in Pre-Service Teachers Education: A Bibliometric Review of the Research Landscape