Cross-Pressures in The Classroom: A Taylorian Photovoice Analysis of Harmonizing Religious and Secular Curriculum in Faith-Based Schools

Faith-based schools operate within increasingly pluralistic educational environments where religious teachings and secular curriculum requirements intersect and, at times, create tensions for teachers. Anchored in Charles Taylor’s theory of secular modernity, particularly the concepts of the immanent frame, cross-pressures, and the buffered self, this study explored how teachers in faith-based schools represent, interpret, and negotiate the relationship between religious teachings and secular curriculum requirements. Specifically, it examined how these tensions are visually represented through Photovoice, how teachers harmonize competing curricular demands in classroom practice, and what insights their narratives provide regarding the nature of cross-pressures in contemporary education. Using a qualitative Participatory Action Research (PAR) design, the study employed Photovoice as the primary method of data generation. Eight teachers from selected faith-based schools in Region XII (SOCCSKSARGEN), including General Santos City and the provinces of South Cotabato, Sarangani, and Sultan Kudarat, participated as co-researchers. Data consisted of photographs and accompanying narratives that captured participants’ lived experiences of teaching within faith-based educational contexts. Findings revealed that teachers visually represented tensions through five themes: curriculum as written obligation and professional compliance, faith as institutional identity and moral compass, barriers and balancing and integration of faith and learning. These themes illustrate how teachers perceive secular curriculum requirements and religious commitments as simultaneously challenging and complementary dimensions of their professional practice. Teachers negotiated and harmonized these demands through two major strategies: integration of faith and academic content and values formation through classroom practices, demonstrating intentional efforts to connect academic learning with spiritual and moral development. Analysis through Taylor’s framework revealed that teachers experience significant cross-pressures arising from the coexistence of secular educational expectations and religious commitments. However, rather than perceiving these as irreconcilable conflicts, participants engaged in reflective meaning-making and curriculum harmonization. Their narratives portrayed teachers as active mediators who bridge faith and academic knowledge, embodying Taylor’s concept of the buffered self. The study concludes that curriculum harmonization serves as a practical and context-responsive approach to achieving balanced education that promotes both academic excellence and spiritual formation. The findings contribute to the growing discourse on faith-based education, curriculum integration, and teacher agency in pluralistic societies. They further highlight the importance of supporting educators in navigating competing educational demands while fostering coherent, inclusive, and values-oriented learning environments.

Keywords

faith-based schools, Photovoice, curriculum harmonization, secularization, cross-pressures, Charles Taylor, faith and learning integration, Participatory Action Research

Downloads

PDF JATS XML

References

1. Alberts, W. (2019). Religious Education as Small ‘i’ Indoctrination: How European Countries Struggle with a Secular Approach to Religion in Schools. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.688 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alexander, H. A., Bergman, M., Pear, R. S. A., Tal, T., Tsaushu, M., Kadan, N. A. T., & Reiss, M. (2025). Dialogue between science and religious education. Science & Education. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11191-025-00710-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al-Farisy, A., Suhaeni, M., Tabilo, D., , S., Chiriace, E., & Robaz, L. (2024). Integration Of Religion Into Curriculum Design And Educational Institution Identity. International Journal of Education Management and Religion. https://doi.org/10.71305/ijemr.v1i2.136 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Amin, H. (2023). Value-based frameworks and peace education in faith-neutral, faith-based and faith-inspired schools in Islamabad: a comparative analysis. Journal of Peace Education, 21, 54 - 81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17400201.2023.2289655 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ansyari, M., Syarif, S., & Riau, K. (2023). Design of Islamic Religious Education: Purposes, alignment of curriculum components and contexts. British Journal of Religious Education, 45, 382 - 393. https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2023.2220940 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Berkowitz, M. W. (2021). PRIMED for character education: Six design principles for school [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Buchanan, J. (2017). Curriculum coherence and educational practice: Bridging policy and classroom realities. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Catalani, C., & Minkler, M. (2010). Photovoice: A review of the literature in health and public health research. Health Education & Behavior, 37(3), 424–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198109342084 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Chan, J., & Erduran, S. (2023). The impact of collaboration between science and religious education teachers on their understanding and views of argumentation. Research in Science Education, 53, 121–137. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11165-022-10041-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Cho, H., Kim, J., & Lee, E. (2025). Working through contradictions: How do teachers respond to the hybridization of the competing institutional logics of curriculum centralization and decentralization?. Asia Pacific Education Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-025-10037-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Cooling, T. (2022). Christian theology and school religious education: Exploring the relationship. Theology, 125(1), 3–11. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0040571X211068154 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Creagh, S., Thompson, G., Mockler, N., & Stacey, M. (2023). Teacher workload and policy pressures in contemporary schooling systems. Teaching and Teacher Education, 121, 103945. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Cush, D. (2007). Should religious studies be part of the compulsory state school curriculum?. British Journal of Religious Education, 29, 217 - 227. https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200701479471 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. D’Agostino, T. J., & Asadullah, M. N. (2025). Faith-based education and development: Opportunities, challenges, and controversies. International Journal of Educational Development. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103440 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Damon, W., Colby, A., & King, P. E. (2018). They do care: An interview with William Damon and Anne Colby on moral development. Journal of Moral Education, 47(4), 383–396. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2018.1494972 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. De Graaf, G. (2020). Value conflicts in academic teaching. Teaching Public Administration, 39, 107 - 124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739420937755 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Erduran, S., Guilfoyle, L., & Park, W. (2022). Science and religious education teachers’ views of argumentation and its teaching. Research in Science Education, 52, 655–673. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11165-020-09966-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ergeshov, E. (2025). Legal and Ethical Aspects of Teaching Religion in Schools. Pharos Journal of Theology. https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.106.3011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Fisher, J. W. (2011). The four domains model: Connecting spirituality, health and well-being. Religions, 2(1), 17–28. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3390/rel2010017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Flensner, K. (2015). Religious Education in contemporary pluralistic Sweden. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Flensner, K. (2018). Secularized and Multi-Religious Classroom Practice-Discourses and Interactions. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030116 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Franchi, L., & Davis, R. (2021). Catholic education and the idea of curriculum. Journal of Catholic Education, 24(2). DOI: 10.15365/joce.2402062021 . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Garcia-Huidobro, J. C. (2017). What are Catholic schools teaching to make a difference? A literature review of curriculum studies in Catholic schools in the U.S. and the U.K. Journal of Catholic Education, 20(2), 64–97. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1138809.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Groome, T. H. (1998). Educating for life: A spiritual vision for every teacher and parent. Thomas More Press. improvement. Routledge. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351030267 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Jackson, R. (2014). Signposts: Policy and practice for teaching about religions and non-religious worldviews in intercultural education. Council of Europe Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Jacob, Y. (2025). Developing and Implementing a Christ-Centered Pedagogy in Christian Religious Education for Effective Faith Formation in Adolescents. Journal of Hunan University Natural Sciences. https://doi.org/10.55463/issn.1674-2974.52.6.10 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Jacob, Y. (2025). Integrating Biblical Teachings in Christian Religious Education to Foster Christ-Centered Character Among College Students. International Journal of Innovation and Thinking. https://doi.org/10.71364/ijit.v2i4.28 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Khakim, D., Ahid, N., & Haq, F. (2023). Religious Education Curriculum Development. Al-Abshar: Journal of Islamic Education Management. https://doi.org/10.58223/al-abshar.v2i1.78 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Khondoker, S., , W., An, A., , M., & , M. (2024). The Role of Faith-Based Education in Bangladesh’s Multicultural System and Its Impact on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review. https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730x.sdgsreview.v5.n02.pe03472 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Lafrarchi, N. (2020). Assessing Islamic Religious Education Curriculum in Flemish Public Secondary Schools. Religions. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11030110 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Lickona, T. (2021). Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. Bantam Books. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/educating-for-character [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. McNeill, K., González‐Howard, M., Katsh-Singer, R., & Loper, S. (2017). Moving beyond Pseudoargumentation: Teachers' Enactments of an Educative Science Curriculum Focused on Argumentation.. Science Education, 101, 426-457. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21274 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Metcalfe, J., & Moulin-Stożek, D. (2020). Religious education teachers’ perspectives on character education. British Journal of Religious Education, 43, 349 - 360. https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2020.1713049 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Mitchell, C. (2011). Doing visual research. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Ndruru, Y., Teko, A., Rosiana, S., Sekolah, T., Teologi, T., Arastamar, I., Daan, J., Km, M., Kebon, K., & Ceper, K. (2024). Teologi Pendidikan Agama Kristen: Fondasi Dan Implikasi Untuk Pendidikan Modern. Tri Tunggal: Jurnal Pendidikan Kristen dan Katolik. https://doi.org/10.61132/tritunggal.v2i2.270 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Newberry, M., & Snyder, A. (2024). Value Misalignment Within Public Primary Teaching Contexts: A Teacher’s Experience with Emotion Regulation and Self-Efficacy When Navigating Between Demands and Beliefs. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 35, 109 - 117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-024-00927-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Nucci, L., Krettenauer, T., & Thompson, W. C. (Eds.). (2024). Handbook of moral and character education (3rd ed.). Routledge. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003374077 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Nurfaisal, N., Sunengko, S., & Abbas, M. (2024). Effective Curriculum Management in Islamic Primary Education: A Case Study of Integrated Islamic Schools. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v16i4.6211 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Nwoko, K., Okeke, C., & Uzochukwu, M. (2023). Systemic pressures and teacher decision-making in developing educational contexts. International Journal of Educational Development, 98, 102764. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Quirke, S., Espinoza, L., & Sensevy, G. (2023). Teacher professional identity and curriculum reform. In Mathematics curriculum reforms around the world. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-13548-4_29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Ross, E. (2023). Teachers' interpretation of curriculum as a window into ‘curriculum potential’. The Curriculum Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.239 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Sultmann, W., Lamb, J., Hall, D., & Borg, G. (2021). Into the Deep: Teacher Reflections on the Development and Implementation of a Trial Religious Education Curriculum. Religious Education, 116, 531 - 544. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344087.2021.1954341 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Supadi, S., Hartania, I., Santosa, H., & Musringudin, M. (2025). Implementing the Independent Curriculum in Faith-Based Primary Education: A Case Study of Insan Mandiri Integrated Islamic School. Journal of Nonformal Education. https://doi.org/10.15294/jone.v11i1.19391 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Uriarte, L., & Rodríguez, L. (2023). Religion at School in Secular Europe. Religions. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14060700 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Wallerstein, N., & Bernstein, E. (1988). Empowerment education: Freire’s ideas adapted to health education. Health Education Quarterly, 15(4), 379–394. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Wang, C. C. (1999). Photovoice: A participatory action research strategy applied to women’s health. Journal of Women’s Health, 8(2), 185–192. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Wang, C. C., & Burris, M. A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education & Behavior, 24(3), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819702400309 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Wang, C. C., & Redwood-Jones, Y. A. (2001). Photovoice ethics: Perspectives from Flint Photovoice. Health Education & Behavior, 28(5), 560–572. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Xu, S., & Lu, C. (2022). Hybridization of curriculum integration and high-stakes testing: Chinese teachers’ experiences and struggles in handling competing institutional logics. Teaching and Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103845 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Cross-Pressures in The Classroom: A Taylorian Photovoice Analysis of Harmonizing Religious and Secular Curriculum in Faith-Based Schools

Authors

Article Information

Publication Timeline

Abstract

Keywords

Downloads

References

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles