Cultural Norms and Barriers to Girls’ Education in Uganda
Authors
Department of Development Studies, College of Humanities and Sciences, Kampala International University (Uganda)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100700962
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 14131-14139
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-08-05
Accepted: 2026-08-10
Published: 2026-08-18
Abstract
Girls’ education remains a central concern in global development discourse, yet cultural norms continue to shape patterns of educational participation in many low- and middle-income contexts. This paper examines how entrenched cultural practices and gendered expectations influence girls’ access to and continuity in formal education in Uganda. Drawing on feminist, social norms and capability perspectives, the study adopts a conceptual analytical approach to synthesize existing scholarship on culture, gender inequality and educational outcomes. The analysis highlights how practices such as early marriage, gendered domestic responsibilities and normative perceptions of female social value interact with structural inequalities to constrain educational opportunities for girls. The paper argues that cultural dynamics should not be understood as static traditions but as socially negotiated processes that intersect with poverty, institutional limitations and policy environments. By reframing cultural norms within broader socio-economic and gendered power relations, the study contributes to debates on inclusive education and gender-responsive development strategies in Uganda and sub-Saharan Africa.
Keywords
Girls’ education; Cultural norms; Gender inequality; Social norms theory; Feminist theory; Educational participation
Downloads
References
1. Cislaghi, B., & Heise, L. (2020). Gender norms and social norms: Differences, similarities and why they matter in prevention science. Sociology of Health & Illness, 42(2), 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Cornwall, A. (2016). Women’s empowerment: What works? Journal of International Development, 28(3), 342–359. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3210 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Evans, D. K., Akmal, M., & Jakiela, P. (2021). Gender gaps in education: The long view. IZA Journal of Development and Migration, 12(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.2478/izajodm-2021-0001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Global Education Monitoring Report Team. (2024). Global education monitoring report 2024: Gender report—Technology on her terms. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Kabeer, N. (2021). Gender equality, inclusive growth, and labour markets. In K. Grantham, G. Dowie, & A. de Haan (Eds.), Women’s economic empowerment: Insights from Africa and South Asia (pp. 13–48). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003141938-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Kazibwe, D., & Li, J. (2025). Universal secondary education, schooling and women’s empowerment: Evidence from Uganda. Journal of Development Economics, 174, 103464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2025.103464 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Marcus, R., Harper, C., Brodbeck, S., & Page, E. (2015). Social norms, gender norms and adolescent girls: A brief guide. Overseas Development Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Ministry of Education and Sports, European Union, & UNICEF. (2024). Mapping cash plus programmes for education outcomes: Evidence from Uganda and global contexts. UNICEF Uganda. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Ministry of Education and Sports & UNICEF. (2025). Gender for Development Uganda: Cash Plus for Adolescent Girls in Lower Secondary. UNICEF Uganda. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Tamale, S. (2020). Decolonization and Afro-Feminism. Daraja Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Tikly, L. (2020). Education for sustainable development in the postcolonial world: Towards a transformative agenda for Africa. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Unterhalter, E. (2024). Soft power in complicated and complex education systems: Gender, education and global governance in organisational responses to SDG 4. International Review of Education, 70, 547–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-024-10098-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Walker, M., & Unterhalter, E. (Eds.). (2007). Amartya Sen’s capability approach and social justice in education. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230604810 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study