Curating the Frontier: Tactical Interventions, Spatial Negotiation, and the Re-Signification of Chiang Saen in Thailand Biennale, Chiang Rai 2023

This paper examines the intersection of contemporary art, curatorial practice, and development policy in the Mekong Subregion through a case study of Thailand Biennale, Chiang Rai 2023: The Open World in Chiang Saen District. Located at the tri-border area of Thailand, Laos, and Myanmar, Chiang Saen reflects overlapping pressures of heritage preservation, cross-border mobility, tourism development, special economic zone planning, and ecological precarity along the Mekong River. The Biennale strategically used historical ruins, riverfront areas, municipal spaces, warehouses, schools, and local cultural venues as temporary exhibition sites, transforming the district into a distributed curatorial landscape. The study investigates how these interventions reconfigured fixed or underused spaces into platforms for public reflection and critical dialogue. Methodologically, it adopts a qualitative case-study approach combining document analysis, site-specific interpretation, and thematic analysis of selected artworks and venues. Findings suggest that the Biennale operated as a form of spatial negotiation in which contemporary art activated tensions between existing site functions and new interpretive possibilities. The paper proposes the concept of curatorial intersectionality to explain how such interventions mediate among state policy, global art discourse, local memory, and socio-ecological urgency. Although temporary, the Biennale re-signified Chiang Saen as a critical cultural site for reconsidering development, heritage, and regional identity in the Mekong context, while also indicating the potential and limits of cultural events as catalysts for spatial and policy reflection.

curatorial strategies; spatial negotiation; Mekong Subregion; cultural policy

1. Arif, M., & Aldosary, A. S. (2023). Urban spatial strategies of the Gulf Cooperation Council: A comparative analysis and lessons learned. Sustainability, 15(18), 13344. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813344 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Art4d. (2024, March). Thailand Biennale Chiang Rai 2023: The Open World. Art4d Magazine Online. Available online: https://art4d.com/2024/03/thailand-biennale-chiang-rai-2023 (Accessed: 8 November 2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Baan Noorg Collaborative Arts & Culture. (2024). Thailand Biennale Chiang Rai: Methodology for a Tai Yuan return (2023–2024). Available online: https://www.baannoorg.org/thailand-biennale-chiang-rai-methodology-for-a-tai-yuan-return-2023-2024 (Accessed: 8 November 2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chandler, D. (2001). Review of The Mekong: Turbulent past, uncertain future, by M. Osborne. The Journal of Asian Studies, 60(3), 922–923. https://doi.org/10.2307/2700174 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cox, K. R., Low, M., & Robinson, J. (Eds.). (2008). The SAGE handbook of political geography. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607880 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. García, B. (2004). Cultural policy and urban regeneration in Western European cities: Lessons from experience, prospects for the future. Local Economy, 19(4), 312–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/0269094042000286828 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Iida, S. (2023). Thailand Biennale Chiang Rai 2023 inspection tour report. National Center for Art Research (NCAR). Available online: https://ncar.artmuseums.go.jp/en/upload/ Thailand%20Biennale%202023%20Chiang%20Rai%20Report.pdf (Accessed: 9 November 2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Jittipat, P. (2022). Power politics and the institutional architecture in the Mekong subregion: Beyond the geopolitical trap. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs. Available online: https://image.mfa.go.th/mfa/0/ 4OJCTby7gE/Points_of_View/Journal_1-2022_Power_Politics and Institutional Architecture in_the_Mekong_Subregion_Jittipat.pdf (Accessed: 9 November 2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kaliner, M. E. (2014). Art, crime, and the image of the city [Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University]. Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH). http://dissertations.umi.com/gsas.harvard:11306 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Navin Production. (2023). His displaced, whose land? Available online: https://www.navinproduction.com/ (Accessed: 8 November 2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. O’Neill, P. (2012). The culture of curating and the curating of culture(s). MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Simon, R. I. (2014). A pedagogy of witnessing: Curatorial practice and the pursuit of social justice. State University of New York Press. https://doi.org/10.1353/book35231 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Spaid, S. (2020). The philosophy of curatorial practice. Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350115361 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Sumiyoshi, C. (2024). Thailand Biennale Chiang Rai 2023. RealTokyo. Available online: https://realtokyo.co.jp/en/exhibition/thailand-biennale-2023/ (Accessed: 9 November 2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Thailand Biennale, Chiang Rai 2023. (2023). The Open World: Curatorial statement. Office of Contemporary Art and Culture (OCAC). Available online: https://tbc2023.thailandbiennale.org/about/ (Accessed: 8 November 2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Townsend, M., Bradley, J., Cook, S., Diamond, S., Fraser, A., Grenville, B., Katyal, A., Martin, S., Medina, C., Mesquita, I., Rollig, S., Sholette, G., & White, P. (2003). Beyond the box: Diverging curatorial practices. Banff Centre Press. https://e-artexte.ca/id/eprint/16092/ (Accessed: 9 November 2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), 1–40. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/1807/138516 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Urban Creature. (2024). Thailand Biennale, Chiang Rai 2023: Reflections and interpretations. Available online: https://urbancreature.co/thailand-biennale-chiang-rai-2023/ (Accessed: 9 November 2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Yale Council on Southeast Asia Studies. (2024). Mekong and metaphor: Contemporary art and regional imaginaries in mainland Southeast Asia. Available online: https://www.nysean.org/events/mekong-and-metaphor-contemporary-art-and-regional-imaginaries-in-mainland-southeast-asia (Accessed: 9 November 2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Influence of Korean Popular Culture on Filipino Millennials: An Assessment Across Food, Fashion, Entertainment, and Beauty Products
• Narrating the Self and Constructing History: A Biography Appreciation Theory Analysis of Gandhi, Chaplin, and Hitler
• Food and Culture in Kashmiri Writings
• When East Meets West: Cross-Cultural Challenges in a Tourist’s Guide to Love
• Cultural Mapping of Movable and Immovable Tangible Cultural Properties of Morong, Bataan: Basis for the Development of Information, Education, and Communication Materials