Cyberbullying, Harm, and Behavioral Theory: A Socio-Legal Analysis in Malaysia

Cyberbullying refers to the intentional infliction of psychological or emotional harm through online communication. In Malaysia, legal responses have historically targeted improper use of digital platforms rather than the harmful conduct itself. The enactment of the Penal Code (Amendment) Act 2025 addresses this legislative gap by introducing specific offences dealing with online harassment and bullying that cause fear, alarm, or distress. This paper aims to evaluate whether the punitive sentencing approach introduced under the amended law is justified in addressing the nature and social impact of cyberbullying. It applies doctrinal legal analysis, supported by behavioral theories including symbolic interactionism, space transition theory, and social learning theory, to understand the motivation behind online aggression. A survey of 106 respondents further assesses public awareness of cyberbullying laws and perceptions of punishment. Preliminary findings reveal that cyberbullying often stems from misinterpretation and imitation of negative behavior. Notably, 20.8% of respondents were unaware that indirect participation online can constitute abetment, and many struggled to distinguish harmful behaviour from unlawful conduct. In addition, an interview with educators, parents, and working adults reinforced survey findings by highlighting that anonymity, emotional impulsiveness, and social influence contribute to cyberbullying and that legal enforcement alone is insufficient. Although Malaysia’s legal reforms are timely and necessary, sentencing must be supplemented with broader measures. It is recommended that punitive enforcement be integrated with education, counselling, and restorative practices, to address the underlying behavioural and psychological factors shaping online misconduct.

Cyberbullying, Penal Code, Sentencing Theories, Malaysia, Social Theories

1. Ahmad, S. A., Noor, N. A. M., Munirah, A.,Isa@Yusuff, Y., Ibrahim, H., Ghazali, O., & Zulkifli, A. N. H. (2020). Cyberbullying: Analysis of laws in Malaysia. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(8), 143–154. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Albar, A. (2021). Cyberbullying in Malaysia: An overview of the legal framework and its adequacy. Journal of Cyber Law and Policy, 10(1), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ismail, S. (2020). Legal challenges in addressing cyberbullying in Malaysia. Malaysian Law Journal, 8(2), 78–92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Low, W. L., & Gill, D. K. (2022). Malaysia’s approach towards cyberbullying: The existing framework. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 25(S2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.35631/IJLGC.730011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Rahman, N. (2022). Reforming cyberbullying laws in Malaysia: A critical analysis. Asian Journal of Law and Policy, 17(3), 200–215. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Yusof, N. S., Hashim, S. N., & Jamil, S. S. (2023). Cyberbullying: A systematic literature review on the definitional criteria. Journal of Cyber Psychology and Behavior. Advance online publication. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Azriq, A., & Rokanatnam, T. (2021). Cyberbullying via social media: Case studies in Malaysia. OIC-CERT Journal on Cybersecurity, 3(1), 31–45. https://www.oic-cert.org/en/journal/pdf/3/1/313.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Mansoor, M. (2024). Enhancing legal responses to cyberbullying in Malaysia: Addressing gaps and proposing reforms (Extended abstract). E-Book of Extended Abstracts, 78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Mears, D. P., & Stafford, M. C. (2025). Gauging the totality of criminal legal sanctions and punishment: Implications for research and policy on retribution and deterrence. Punishment & Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745251344576 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Saleh, S. N. A., & Nurhadiyanto, L. (2024). Identifikasi tindakan cyberbullying dalam aktivitas online role-playing berbasis media sosial. Jurnal Manajemen, Pendidikan, dan Ilmu Sosial, 5(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. https://doi.org/10.38035/jmpis.v5i3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Qing, M. (2024). The mechanism and prevention strategies of adolescent cyberbullying: Based on the perspective of social learning theory. Advances in Psychology, 14(9), 343–350. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2024.149655 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Jaishankar, K. (2019). Cyber criminology and space transition theory: Contribution and impact. In International Centre for the Prevention of Crime (Ed.), 6th International Report on Crime Prevention and Community Safety: Preventing Cybercrime (pp. 101–110). International Centre for the Prevention of Crime. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5082409 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073–1137. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035618 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2010). Cyberbullying prevention and response: Expert perspectives. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Tokunaga, R. S. (2010). Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 277–287. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
• Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
• The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
• An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
• The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.