Deferred Tax Accounting and its Implications for Firm Performance and Capital Structure in the Oil and Gas Industry in Nigeria

Authors

Busuyi Emmanuel Omodara

Department of Accounting and Finance, Ajayi Crowther University, Oyo, Oyo State (Nigeria)

Vincent Olawale Bamidele

Department of Accounting, Federal College of Education (Technical), Gusau, Zamfara State (Nigeria)

Olusola Success Adeyemi

Department of Accounting, Ekiti State University, Ado Ekiti, Ekiti State (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10200553

Subject Category: Accounting

Volume/Issue: 10/2 | Page No: 7727-7742

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-03-06

Accepted: 2026-03-12

Published: 2026-03-20

Abstract

This study investigates the implications of deferred tax accounting for firm performance and capital structure in the Nigerian oil and gas industry. Deferred tax arises from temporary differences between accounting and taxable income, as regulated by IAS 12 and the Petroleum Industry Act. Despite its theoretical importance, empirical evidence on the direct impact of deferred tax assets and liabilities on financial outcomes in this sector remains limited. Using an ex post facto research design, the study analyzes panel data from 2010 to 2024 for six oil and gas firms listed on the Nigerian Exchange Group. Descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and panel regression models were employed, with return on assets (ROA) and debt-to-equity ratio (DER) serving as proxies for firm performance and capital structure, respectively. The results reveal that the deferred tax liability ratio (DTLR) has a negative and significant effect on ROA, indicating that higher deferred tax liabilities are associated with lower firm performance. Conversely, the deferred tax asset ratio (DTAR) exerts a positive and significant effect on ROA, suggesting that higher deferred tax assets enhance profitability. For capital structure, DTLR is positively and significantly related to DER, while DTAR is negatively associated with DER, implying that deferred tax liabilities increase leverage, whereas deferred tax assets reduce it. Firm age and size also significantly influence both performance and capital structure. The findings underscore the strategic importance of deferred tax accounting in financial management and highlight the need for transparent and prudent tax planning in the oil and gas sector. The study offers practical insights for managers, investors, and policymakers seeking to optimize tax strategies and regulatory compliance.

Keywords

Deferred tax accounting, firm performance, capital structure, oil and gas industry, Nigeria, panel regression.

Downloads

References

1. Aulia, H., & Gandakusuma, I. (2020). The effect of capital structure on firm performance of manufacturing companies in ASEAN 5 country. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Economics, Business and Social Science, 5(1), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.2991/AEBMR.K.200606.080 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bamidele, V. O., & Abdulsalam, D. (2025). Corporate tax planning and market value of Nigerian listed non-financial manufacturing companies. Jurnal Akuntansi, 17(2), 383–400. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. https://doi.org/10.28932/jam.v17i2.13191 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bamidele, V. O., Fajana, K. J., & Omananyi, A. (2024). Financial leverage and financial performance of quoted firms in Nigeria: Evidence from oil and gas and agriculture sectors. Journal of Accounting and Financial Management Sciences, 10(8), 459–472. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bamidele, V. O., Ogundipe, F. B., & Adedeji, O. E. (2025). Working capital management and financial performance of production-based firms in Nigeria: A panel data analysis. Journal of Accounting, Business and Social Sciences, 9(1), 115-135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chytis, E., Koumanakos, E., & Siriopoulos, C. (2013). Deferred tax positions under the prism of financial crisis and the effects of a corporate tax reform. Research Papers in Economics, 12(3), 55–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Edeigba, J., Gyapong, E., & Tawiah, V. (2023). Analyses of unintended consequences of IAS 12 on deferred income taxes. China Accounting and Finance Review, 15(2), 77–92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. https://doi.org/10.1108/CAFR-08-2022-0098 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Gaeremynck, A., & Van de Gucht, L. (2004). The recognition and timing of deferred tax liabilities. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 31(7–8), 1149–1178. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0306686X.2004.00564.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Jensen, M.C., & Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Junita, R., & Wahyuni, P. D. (2024). The influence of deferred tax, tax to book ratio and firm size on company performance. International Journal of Accounting, Management, Economics and Social Sciences, 2(5), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.61990/ijamesc.v2i5.339 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kajananthan, R. (2012). Its impact on firm performance: A study on Sri Lankan listed manufacturing companies. Social Science Research Network, 8(1), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kraus, A., & Litzenberger, R.H. (1973). A State-Preference Model of Optimal Financial Leverage. The Journal of Finance, 28(4), 911-922. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ladas, A. C., Negkakis, C., & Samara, A. D. (2017). Accounting quality, deferred tax and risk in the banking industry. International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance, 24(3), 123– 135. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBAAF.2017.10006264 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Muslim, A. B., Wulandari, T., & Wulandari, D. S. (2025). Decoding deferred tax expense: Its impact on tax avoidance through the lens of foreign ownership. International Journal of Accounting, Management, Economics and Social Sciences, 3(2), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.61990/ijamesc.v3i2.488 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Novita, L., Putri, A. A., & Ramashar, W. (2023). The influence of deferred tax burden, tax planning, and deferred tax assets on earnings management strategy. Research in Accounting Journal, 3(1), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.37385/raj.v3i1.1904 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ogbada, E. I., & Jones, E. (2023). Deferred tax accounting and financial performance of listed consumer goods’ manufacturing companies in Nigeria. Journal of Accounting and Financial Management, 8(8), 29–47. https://doi.org/10.56201/jafm.v8.no8.2022.pg29.47 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ogunmakin, A. A., Bamidele, V. O., & Ogundipe, F. B. (2025). Retained earnings and financial performance of quoted firms in Nigeria: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Accounting, Management, Economics and Social Sciences, 3(2), 475–485. https://doi.org/10.61990/ijamesc.v3i2.444 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Rachmat, R. A. H. (2021). The effect of capital structure and profitability on tax avoidance in manufacturing companies listed on the IDX 2013–2017. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(8), 200–210. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Totanan, C., Yamin, & S, M. A. (2018). The quality of income of manufacturing companies in Indonesia based on the tax planning and deferred paid tax. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 9(2), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.2991/AMCA-18.2018.122 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Widiatmoko, J., & Mayangsari, I. (2016). The impact of deferred tax assets, discretionary accrual, leverage, company size and tax planning on earnings management practices. Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen, 7(1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.15294/jdm.v7i1.5750 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Zhang, T., & Yu, W. (2021). Value correlation of deferred income tax in industrialization. Converter, 4(3), 120–130. https://doi.org/10.17762/CONVERTER.43 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles