Defining and Creating Entrepreneurial Value: A Multi-Capital, Process and Context Framework

Entrepreneurial activity is routinely expected to generate growth, employment, innovation and social improvement, yet entrepreneurship research remains imprecise about what constitutes value, which resources enable its creation and how context shapes its distribution. This conceptual paper addresses that problem by integrating resource-based theory, resource orchestration, effectuation, business-model research, stakeholder exchange and entrepreneurial ecosystem perspectives. It defines entrepreneurial value as a stakeholder-recognised change in economic, social, intellectual-cultural or ecological conditions arising through entrepreneurial action, while distinguishing value creation from capture and value destruction. Entrepreneurial capital is defined as the contextually situated portfolio of tangible and intangible stocks that an entrepreneurial actor can access, mobilise, recombine, renew or deplete. The proposed framework comprises eight forms of capital: cultural, experiential (human), financial, intellectual, manufactured, natural, social and spiritual. Six propositions explain how portfolio diversity, orchestration, process choice, stakeholder recognition, contextual fit and temporal feedback influence realised value. The contribution of this paper is an integrated, testable model connecting resource portfolios, entrepreneurial mechanisms, multidimensional outcomes and ecosystem conditions. The framework also offers a practical diagnostic for entrepreneurs, educators, investors and policymakers seeking to assess value beyond venture growth alone.

entrepreneurial value; entrepreneurial capital; resource orchestration; effectuation; stakeholder value; entrepreneurial ecosystems

1. Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Discovery and creation: Alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1–2), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2010). Entrepreneurship and epistemology: The philosophical underpinnings of the study of entrepreneurial opportunities. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 557–583. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2010.495521 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 493–520. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.187 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bowman, C., & Ambrosini, V. (2000). Value creation versus value capture: Towards a coherent definition of value in strategy. British Journal of Management, 11(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00147 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bozward, D. (2022). A strategic model for opportunity recognition and entrepreneurship within rural and agricultural regions. International Journal of Agribusiness and Plantations Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bozward, D (2026) Entrepreneurial Capital and Sustainable Value Creation: Advancing an Eight-Capital Model, Definitions, and an Empirical Validation Agenda. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 10 (4). pp. 4678-4693. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100400340 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bozward, D., Rogers-Draycott, M. Exploring the impact of entrepreneurial experience on future entrepreneurship aspirations. Entrep Educ 7, 417–440 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41959-024-00121-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Chandler, G. N., DeTienne, D. R., McKelvie, A., & Mumford, T. V. (2011). Causation and effectuation processes: A validation study. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(3), 375–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.10.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Erikson, T. (2002). Entrepreneurial capital: The emerging venture’s most important asset and competitive advantage. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(3), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00062-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. IFRS Foundation. (2021). International Integrated Reporting Framework. https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/integrated-reporting/framework/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Review, 10(1–2), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Lepak, D. P., Smith, K. G., & Taylor, M. S. (2007). Value creation and value capture: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 180–194. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.23464011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Pinelli, M., Lechner, C., Kraus, S., & Liguori, E. (2022). Entrepreneurial value creation: Conceptualizing an exchange-based view of entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 29(2), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-04-2021-0155 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Santos, F. M. (2012). A positive theory of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 335–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1413-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791611 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Gilbert, B. A. (2011). Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage: Breadth, depth, and life cycle effects. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1390–1412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310385695 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: A sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759–1769. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 172–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Zahra, S. A., & Wright, M. (2016). Understanding the social role of entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Studies, 53(4), 610–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12149 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2010). Business model design: An activity system perspective. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 216–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Entrepreneurship and Start-Up Ecosystem Vis-À-Vis Government Start-Up Scheme in Manipur: A Critical Review and a Way Forward
• Building Resilience: How Malaysian Women Entrepreneurs Use Strengths and Resources to Navigate Challenges
• Branding in Digital Entrepreneurship: Evaluating Branding Criteria in IT Entrepreneurship
• Bridging the Intention–Action Gap through Entrepreneurial Optimism: A Conceptual Exploration
• Entrepreneurial Orientation of Undergraduate Students in University Malaysia Perlis: A Conceptual Paper