Deforestation in Tirah Valley: Local Knowledge, State Negligence, and Climate Vulnerability

The Tirah Valley in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan, is among the country’s most ecologically significant yet critically threatened highland forest systems. Situated between the Khyber Pass and Khanki Valley at elevations of 1,500–2,100 m, its forests have historically sustained biodiversity, regulated hydrological systems, and underpinned community livelihoods through a customary governance regime rooted in tribal law and collective responsibility. Post-2000 insurgency, military operations, and mass displacement dismantled these indigenous institutions, creating a governance vacuum exploited by organised criminal timber networks. A structurally weak state forest administration has proven unable to fill this gap, while credible allegations of official complicity in timber smuggling further erode institutional credibility. Drawing on in-depth qualitative interviews with community elders, activists, and displaced residents, supplemented by policy documents, grey literature, and international case studies, this paper adopts a comparative institutional approach. It situates the Tirah case within regional frameworks, including Ostrom’s (1990) common-pool resource theory and Scott’s (1998) legibility critique, alongside comparative evidence from Nepal and the Philippines, as well as Pakistan’s own indigenous governance traditions, including the Jirga, Shamilat, and Rewaj systems. The study examines the multi-layered causes of deforestation, the historical architecture of customary forest governance, structural shortcomings of state environmental policy, and the ecological and climatic consequences observed by communities. Respondents documented dramatic reductions in snowfall and rainfall, accelerated soil erosion, biodiversity loss, and the emergence of previously unknown disease burdens. The paper argues that persistent deforestation reflects a fundamental disarticulation between local knowledge-based governance systems and a state apparatus that has systematically failed to engage with them. Effective conservation in Tirah demands formal legal recognition of community authority, structural reform of enforcement accountability, and governance frameworks built upon, rather than displacing, the institutional traditions of tribal forest stewardship.

deforestation; Tirah Valley; indigenous forest governance

1. Afridi, Fareed. (2025). Personal communication. Elder resident, Tirah Valley, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. [Interview conducted by author]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Afridi, Idrees. (2025). Personal communication. Community activist and former forest protection organiser, Tirah Valley, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. [Interview conducted by author]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Afridi, Sanaullah. (2025). Personal communication. Resident, Tirah Valley, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. [Interview conducted by author]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Confidential Interview A. (2025). Confidential interview. Elder woman, Tirah Valley, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Identity withheld to protect participant. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Confidential Interview B. (2025). Confidential interview. Young male resident, Rajgal area, Tirah Valley, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Identity withheld to protect participant. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Marjan, Ali. (2025). Personal communication. Resident and forest protection committee member, Maidan Valley, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. [Interview conducted by author]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Shanawaz. (2025). Personal communication. Elder, Meraban Kalay, Tirah Valley, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. [Interview conducted by author] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Agrawal, A., & Chhatre, A. (2006). “Explaining success on the commons: Community forest governance in the Indian Himalaya.” World Development, 34(1), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.07.013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ahmed, M., & Mahmood, A. (1998). “Alternative forest management approaches in Pakistan.” In M. Ahmed (Ed.), Forest management in Pakistan: Policy and practice (pp. 45–78). Pakistan Forest Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Berkes, F. (2008). Sacred ecology (2nd Ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Butz, D. (1996). “Sustaining indigenous communities: Symbolic and instrumental dimensions of pastoral resource use in Shimshal, Northern Pakistan.” The Canadian Geographer, 40(1), 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0064.1996.tb00428.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Chaudhry, M. T. (2020). “Forest governance in Pakistan: Challenges and pathways to reform.” Pakistan Journal of Forestry, 70(2), 1–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Colchester, M. (2004). “Conservation policy and indigenous peoples.” Environmental Science & Policy, 7(3), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2004.02.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Cox, M., Arnold, G., & Villamayor-Tomás, S. (2010). “A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management.” Ecology and Society, 15(4), 38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Dawn. (2015, July 9). After militancy, Tirah faces threat of deforestation. https://www.dawn.com/news/1188534 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Dawn. (2019, June 30). The road to Tirah’s development. https://www.dawn.com/news/1491205 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Dawn. (2023a). Extension of forest laws to Tirah valley in limbo. https://www.dawn.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Dawn. (2023b, October). Seven Khyber forest officials suspended. https://www.dawn.com/news/1776766 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Dawn. (2024, September 17). For Tirah Valley’s internally displaced, there’s no way home. https://www.dawn.com/news/1858719 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Express Tribune. (2021, June 20). Fires decimate hundreds of acres of K-P forests. https://tribune.com.pk/story/2306249 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Gazdar, H., & Mallah, H. B. (2013). Informality and rural livelihoods: Understanding common property resources in Pakistan. Collective for Social Science Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. (2022). Provincial REDD+ Action Plan of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. KP Forests, Environment and Wildlife Department and National REDD+ Office, Federal Ministry of Climate Change. https://www.redd-pakistan.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/KP-REDD-Action-Plan.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Hardin, G. (1968). “The tragedy of the commons.” Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Khan, Z., & Ali, S. (2019). “Governance and forest degradation in post-FATA merger Khyber Pakhtunkhwa: Institutional challenges and community responses.” Journal of Political Studies, 26(2), 45–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Nagendra, H. (2007). “Drivers of reforestation in human-dominated forests.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(39), 15218–15223. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0702319104 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. News International, The. (2018, October 30). Checkposts set up to stop timber smuggling. https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/387494 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Pakhtunkhwa Bulletin. (2022, October 6). Tirah Valley being denuded of its natural forests. https://pkbtn.com/2022/10/06 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Portelli, A. (1991). The death of Luigi Trastulli and other stories: Form and meaning in oral history. State University of New York Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Sheil, D., & Murdiyarso, D. (2009). “How forests attract rain: An examination of a new hypothesis.” BioScience, 59(4), 341–347. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.4.12 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Sultan-i-Rome. (2007). Forestry in the princely state of Swat and Kalam (North-West Pakistan): A historical and contemporary analysis of forest management and its implications for sustainable development. IP6 Working Paper No. 6. Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research North-South. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Tribal News Network. (2023). Forest department officials in Khyber face allegations of timber smuggling. https://tnnenglish.com/forest-department-officials-in-khyber-face-allegations-of-timber-smuggling [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Young, O. R. (2002). The institutional dimensions of environmental change: Fit, interplay, and scale. MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Agrawal, A. (2001). Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources. World Development, 29(10), 1649–1672. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00063-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Baland, J.-M., & Platteau, J.-P. (1996). Halting degradation of natural resources: Is there a role for rural communities? FAO and Clarendon Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Bruijnzeel, L. A. (2004). Hydrological functions of tropical forests: Not seeing the soil for the trees? Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 104(1), 185–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2004.01.015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Calder, I. R. (2007). Forests and water—Ensuring forest benefits outweigh water costs. Forest Ecology and Management, 251(1–2), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.06.015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Cardinale, B. J., Duffy, J. E., Gonzalez, A., Hooper, D. U., Perrings, C., Venail, P., Narwani, A., Mace, G. M., Tilman, D., Wardle, D. A., Kinzig, A. P., Daily, G. C., Loreau, M., Grace, J. B., Larigauderie, A., Srivastava, D. S., & Naeem, S. (2012). Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature, 486, 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11148 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). (2022). Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. CBD/COP/15/L.25. https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-15/cop-15-dec-04-en.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Danielsen, F., Burgess, N. D., Balmford, A., Donald, P. F., Funder, M., Jones, J. P. G., Alviola, P., Balete, D. S., Blomley, T., Brashares, J., Child, B., Enghoff, M., Fjeldsa, J., Holt, S., Huvarinen, H., MacKinnon, K., Sam, M. K., Sunde, P., Svenning, J.-C., & Burgess, N. (2009). Local participation in natural resource monitoring: A characterization of approaches. Conservation Biology, 23(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01063.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Dove, M. R. (1993). A revisionist view of tropical deforestation and development. Environmental Conservation, 20(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892900037188 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2018). The state of the world’s forests 2018: Forest pathways to sustainable development. FAO. https://www.fao.org/3/I9535EN/i9535en.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Global Financial Integrity. (2015). Transnational crime and the developing world. Global Financial Integrity. https://gfintegrity.org/report/transnational-crime-and-the-developing-world/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Government of Pakistan. (2015). National Forest Policy 2015. Ministry of Climate Change, Islamabad. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2022). Climate change 2022: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the IPCC (P. R. Shukla et al., Eds.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157926 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Island Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Nackoney, J., Molinario, G., Potapov, P., Turubanova, S., Hansen, M. C., & Furuichi, T. (2014). Impacts of civil conflict on primary forest habitat in northern Democratic Republic of the Congo, 1990–2010. Biological Conservation, 170, 321–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.12.033 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Patz, J. A., Daszak, P., Tabor, G. M., Aguirre, A. A., Pearl, M., Epstein, J., Wolfe, N. D., Kilpatrick, A. M., Foufopoulos, J., Molyneux, D., & Bradley, D. J. (2004). Unhealthy landscapes: Policy recommendations on land use change and infectious disease emergence. Environmental Health Perspectives, 112(10), 1092–1098. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.6877 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Paudel, N. S., Monterroso, I., Cronkleton, P., Karki, R., & Bhattarai, B. (2019). Community forestry and forest cover change in the hills of Nepal. Forest Policy and Economics, 101, 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.01.008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Ribot, J. C. (2002). Democratic decentralization of natural resources: Institutionalizing popular participation. World Resources Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Roberts, T. J. (1977). The mammals of Pakistan. Ernest Benn Limited. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Townsend, C. R., Uhlmann, S. S., & Matthaei, C. D. (2011). Individual and combined responses of stream ecosystems to multiple stressors. Journal of Applied Ecology, 45(6), 1810–1819. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01548.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2016). World wildlife crime report: Trafficking in protected species. UNODC. https://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/wildlife/World_Wildlife_Crime_Report_2016_final.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Agarwood: A Fragrant Link between India and Southeast Asia
• Pens of Protest: Malayalam Press in the Freedom Struggle
• Long-Term Trends of Temperature and Rainfall in Sivakasi: A Climatic Assessment (1980–2025)
• Iran’s Forgotten Friend William Morgan Shuster: Victim of Anglo-Russian Conspiracy
• The (Moordkop) Murder Hill Massacre 1830: A Historical Analysis of the Griqua-Ndebele Conflict