Delays in the Criminal Justice System: An Empirical Study of Case Backlogs and Their Causes in Matabeleland North Province, Zimbabwe

This study investigates the nature, extent, and underlying causes of delays in the criminal justice system within Matabeleland North Province, Zimbabwe. Persistent case backlogs represent one of the most critical challenges confronting the administration of justice in developing nations, resulting in prolonged pre-trial detention, erosion of public trust, and systemic violations of the constitutional right to a fair and expeditious trial. Using a mixed-methods empirical approach, this research collects quantitative data from court records and qualitative data through interviews with magistrates, prosecutors, defence lawyers, police officers, and accused persons or remand prisoners. The study examines structural, procedural, human resource, infrastructural, and socio-economic factors that contribute to case accumulation and slow resolution in the region. Findings are expected to provide an evidence-based foundation for targeted policy reforms, resource allocation strategies, and institutional capacity building within the Zimbabwean criminal justice system. The study is anchored in the right to a fair trial as enshrined in Section 69 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe (2013) and draws on comparative jurisprudence from neighbouring jurisdictions in Southern Africa.

Criminal Justice, Case Backlogs, Court Delays, Matabeleland North

1. Altbeker, A. (2005). The dirty work of democracy: A year on the streets with the SAPS. Jonathan Ball Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Cappelletti, M. and Garth, B. (1978). 'Access to Justice: The Worldwide Movement to Make Rights Effective.' In M. Cappelletti and B. Garth (eds.), Access to Justice: A World Survey. Milan: Giuffrè. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Church, T. W. (1982). Examining local legal culture. American Bar Foundation Research Journal, 7(3), 449–518. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Coltart, D. (2008). A decade of suffering in Zimbabwe: Economic collapse and political repression under Robert Mugabe. CATO Institute Development Policy Analysis. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Constitution of Zimbabwe. Harare: Government Printer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Contini, F. and Mohr, R. (2008). 'Reconciling Independence and Accountability in Judicial Systems.' Utrecht Law Review, 3(2), 26–43. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act [Chapter 9:07]. Harare: Government Printer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Dakolias, M. (1999). Court Performance around the World: A Comparative Perspective. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Technical Paper No. 430. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ehrlich, R., & Du Plessis, L. (2015). Digital case management and court delays in South African Magistrates' Courts: A pilot evaluation. South African Journal of Criminal Justice, 28(1), 45–71. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. European Court of Human Rights. (1983). Zimmermann and Steiner v. Switzerland, Application No. 8737/79. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Fabri, M., & Langbroek, P. M. (Eds.). (2003). The Challenge of Change for Judicial Systems. IOS Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Feeley, M.M. (1979). The Process Is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Golub, S. (2003). 'Beyond Rule of Law Orthodoxy: The Legal Empowerment Alternative.' Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Working Paper, No. 41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hansungule, M., Feeney, P., & Palmer, R. (1998). Report on land tenure insecurity on the Zambian Copperbelt. Oxfam GB for the Zambia Land Alliance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hartley, R. and Case, B. (2011). 'Adjournment Culture and Case Delay in South African Magistrates' Courts.' South African Journal of Criminal Justice, 24(1), 45–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Judicial Service Commission of Zimbabwe. (2019–2023). Annual Reports. Harare: JSC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kariuki, F. (2014). 'Causes of Delay in Criminal Cases in Kenyan Magistrates' Courts.' University of Nairobi Law Journal, 6(1), 112–135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Legal Resources Foundation Zimbabwe. (2020). Access to Justice in Rural Zimbabwe: Challenges and Opportunities. Harare: LRF. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Magistrates Court Act [Chapter 7:10]. Harare: Government Printer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Moyo, G. (2016). 'Judicial Reform in Zimbabwe: Challenges and Prospects.' African Journal of Legal Studies, 9(2–3), 177–206. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Munyati, C. (2019). Plea bargaining and court efficiency in Zambia: Urban-rural disparities in implementation. Zambia Law Journal, 50, 113–142. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Mupangavanhu, B. M. (2016). An analysis of the right to a speedy trial under section 69(2) of the Constitution of Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe Law Review, 29, 78–104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. National Prosecuting Authority Act [Chapter 7:20]. Harare: Government Printer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Ncube, C. (2018). 'Access to Justice in Rural Zimbabwe: The Circuit Court System under Scrutiny.' Zimbabwe Law Review, 14(1), 88–112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Packer, H. L. (1964). 'Two Models of the Criminal Process.' University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 113(1), 1–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Peter, C. M. (2004). Inordinate delay in the administration of justice and the right to a fair trial in Tanzania. Law and Justice in Tanzania: Twenty-Five Years of the Court of Appeal, 2004, 112–145. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Prempeh, H. K. (2007). 'Africa's 'Constitutionalism Revival': False Start or New Dawn?' International Journal of Constitutional Law, 5(3), 469–506. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and Organizations. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Skelton, A., & Palmary, I. (2017). Agency, structure and court delay: Rethinking systemic accounts of case backlogs in South Africa. South African Crime Quarterly, 61, 25–38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2005). Programming for Justice: Access for All. Bangkok: UNDP Asia Pacific. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2006). The United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (Nelson Mandela Rules). Vienna: UNODC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An Introductory Analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Harper & Row. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Zander, M., & Henderson, P. (1993). Crown Court Study. Royal Commission on Criminal Justice Research Study No. 19. HMSO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Zimbabwe Human Rights Commission (ZHRC). (2019). Report on Conditions in Places of Detention. Harare: ZHRC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Zimbabwe Human Rights Commission (ZHRC). (2021). Annual Report. Harare: ZHRC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights (ZLHR). (2020). Pre-Trial Detention in Zimbabwe: A Human Rights Audit. Harare: ZLHR. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Zimbabwe Prisons and Correctional Service (ZPCS). (2019–2022). Annual Reports. Harare: ZPCS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Occupational Culture in Relation to Job Satisfaction and Work Performance among Police
• Inmates' Character Reformation and Recidivism in Nigeria: A Study of Okaka Correctional Facility, Yenagoa, Bayelsa State.
• Life World of Former Female Basic Internal Security Operations Course (BISOC) Trainees
• Efficacy of Fingerprint and Facial Recognition in Enhancing National Security in Kenya
• No More Catcalling: Awareness of College of Criminal Justice Education Students on Republic Act 11313 Also Known as Safe Spaces Act