Demand and Supply Perspectives on Birth Registration in Nigeria: Evidence from the Federal Capital Territory

Birth registration underpins legal identity, reliable vital statistics, and evidence based population policy. Despite Nigeria’s compulsory registration law and accelerated digitalization, national coverage for children under five reached only 57 percent in 2024 with 14 million births registered between 2022 and 2024 through health facility integration and eCRVS. Using a demand–supply framework, this study examines birth registration in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) using mixed methods data collected in 2021. Demand side analysis draws on a multistage KAP survey of 1,266 residents; supply side data derived from structured questionnaires and key informant interviews with the FCT Head of Vital Registration and all six Area Council Comptrollers. Demand side results show 72.8 percent overall vital event registration practice (births dominant), with strong gradients by education, income, marital status, religion, and urban residence. Probit models confirm awareness (coef. 1.37, p<0.001) and process knowledge as the dominant predictors. Supply side findings document a functional NPC structure with 219 registration centres, PDA to RapidSMS digitization, free certificates, and 50 percent of registrants originating from co located health facilities. However, average travel distance (5.89 km) exceeds most respondents’ willingness, especially in peripheral councils. The FCT outperforms national averages because supply advantages in AMAC and Bwari translate directly into higher demand uptake, while peripheral gaps mirror broader Nigerian bottlenecks. Comparative analysis with other African capitals (Kigali, Accra, Nairobi, Dakar, Gaborone) shows that full health decentralization and interoperability—as in Rwanda and Botswana—achieve near universal urban coverage. This study contributes to CRVS scholarship by systematically quantifying the respective impacts of behavioural and infrastructural factors in a rapidly urbanizing capital territory. It also provides scalable insights applicable to Nigeria’s demographic transition.

birth registration, CRVS, demand–supply framework

1. Abbas, A. M. (2014). Locational and Coverage Analysis of the Vital Registration Centres in Gombe State, Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology, 8(1), 79–88. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aidenagbon, G., Mundi, R., & Dakyes, S. P. (2025). The demographic, socio-cultural and economic dimensions of the practice of vital registration in the Federal Capital Territory, Nigeria. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(3), 3358–3368. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.90300263 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Anaduaka, U. S., Odimegwu, C. O., Adedini, S. A., et al. (2022). Multilevel analysis of individual- and community-level determinants of birth certification of children under-5 years in Nigeria: Evidence from a household survey. BMC Public Health, 22, Article 2463. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14786-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bongaarts, J., & Watkins, S. C. (1996). Social interactions and contemporary fertility transitions. Population and Development Review, 22(4), 639–682. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137804 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Caldwell, J. C. (1976). Toward a restatement of demographic transition theory. Population and Development Review, 2(3–4), 321–366. https://doi.org/10.2307/1971615 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Castle, S., Ortiz, E., & Setel, P. (2020). Demand-side factors related to the registration of births, marriages, and deaths: A literature review (CRVS Working Paper Series, Issue 2). CRVS Knowledge Gateway. https://crvssystems.ca/sites/default/files/assets/images/Issue2_Demand%20side%20factors_e.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Makinde, O. A., Odimegwu, C. O., Udoh, M. O., Adedini, S. A., & Akinyemi, J. O. (2020). Death registration in Nigeria: A systematic literature review of its performance and challenges. Global Health Action, 13(1), Article 1811476. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2020.1811476 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Målqvist, M., et al. (2018). Targeted interventions for improved equity in maternal and child health in low- and middle-income settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis; or equivalent on birth registration predictors in LMICs]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. National Population Commission [Nigeria] & ICF. (2025). Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2024. NPC and ICF. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Notestein, F. W. (1945). Population—The long view. In T. W. Schultz (Ed.), Food for the world (pp. 36–57). University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Silva, R. (2022). Population perspectives and demographic methods to strengthen civil registration and vital statistics systems. Genus, 78, Article 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-022-00156-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Suthar, A. B., Khalifa, A., Yin, S., Wenz, K., Ma Fat, D., Mills, S. L., Nichols, E., AbouZahr, C., & Mrkic, S. (2019). Evaluation of approaches to strengthen civil registration and vital statistics systems: A systematic review and synthesis of policies in 25 countries. PLoS Medicine, 16(9), Article e1002929. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002929 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. United Nations Children’s Fund. (2019). Birth registration impact evaluation report: Nigeria. UNICEF Nigeria. https://www.unicef.org/nigeria/sites/unicef.org.nigeria/files/2019-04/Birth%20 Registration %20Impact%20Evaluation%20Report.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. United Nations Children’s Fund. (2024). The right start in life: Global levels and trends in birth registration (2024 update) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. World Health Organization & United Nations Children’s Fund. (2020). Civil registration and vital statistics: Guidance on health sector contributions [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Intergenerational Cycle of Deprivation: A Narrative Review of Early-Life Deprivation and Adult Socioeconomic Outcomes
• Spatially Informed Estimation of Child Multidimensional Poverty at Local Government Area Level in Nigeria: A SAE-Inspired Regression Approach Using Mics 2021 And Worldpop 2020 Data