Demographic Profile and the Perceived Effectiveness of the Sustainable Livelihood Program (SLP) of the Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) in Microenterprise Development

The Sustainable Livelihood Program (SLP) is a community-based initiative aimed at empowering poor, vulnerable, and marginalized households by improving access to sustainable income-generating opportunities. This study assessed the effectiveness of the SLP in fostering microenterprise development in Norala and Sto. Niño, South Cotabato, utilizing a descriptive-correlational research design with data gathered from 46 beneficiaries through structured surveys. Findings reveal that the majority of beneficiaries are middle-aged women with small households and low annual incomes.
The program's implementation was highly rated, particularly regarding the guidelines for accessing the Seed Capital Fund. Economic results demonstrated significant improvements in asset accumulation and productivity, and social networks indicated positive effects on living conditions. Strong correlations were established between microenterprise development and both economic and social outcomes; however, inadequate seed capital funding emerged as a critical issue. The study concludes that the SLP positively influences the economic and social well-being of its beneficiaries and recommends future enhancements in post-funding monitoring, youth participation, financial literacy, market connectivity, and leadership development to bolster the program's sustainability and long-term impact.

perceived, effectiveness, sustainable livelihood program

1. Ananian, G., & Dellaferrera, F. (2024). Rural-urban employment disparities: Evidence from 58 countries. International Labour Organization. https://www.ilo.org/employment- research/rural-urban-gaps [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Avalos, J., & Acosta, P. A. (2018). The Philippines Sustainable Livelihood Program. In the World Bank, Washington, DC, eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1596/29873 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Banerjee, A., Duflo, E., Glennerster, R., & Kinnan, C. (2015a). The miracle of microfinance? Evidence from a randomized evaluation. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 7(1), 22–53. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257%2Fapp.20130533&source=post_page [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Banerjee, A., Duflo, E., Goldberg, N., Karlan, D., Osei, R., Parienté, W., Shapiro, J., Thuysbaert, B., & Udry, C. (2015). A multifaceted program causes lasting progress for the very poor: Evidence from six countries. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1260799 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bhoyar, P. K., Sharma, P., & Kumar, S. (2025). Long-term outcomes and resilience in entrepreneurship education: A comprehensive analysis. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2479399 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Blanchard, O. J., & Perotti, R. (2020). An empirical characterization of the dynamic effects of changes in government spending and taxes on output. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(4), 1329-1368. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. https://academic.oup.com/qje/article-abstract/117/4/1329/1875961 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Blattman, C., Green, E. P., Jamison, J., Lehmann, M. C., & Annan, J. (2016). The Returns to Microenterprise Support among the Ultrapoor: A Field Experiment in Postwar Uganda. American Economic Journal Applied Economics, 8(2), 35–64. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20150023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Booth, R. B., Hussain, M., Medina, A., Hilton, K., Siegel-Stechler, K., & de Guzman, P. (2024, April 4). Lack of civic support for rural youth may lead to lower civic engagement.The Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Https://circle.tufts.edu/latest-research/lack-civic-support-rural-youth-mayt [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Castillo, J. R., & Mantillas, C. (2024). Sustainable Livelihood Program in selected local government units of Rizal Province, Philippines: Basis for an Action plan. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2(11). https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0476 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Department of Social Welfare and Development. (2023). Sustainable Livelihood Program. https://car.dswd.gov.ph/programs-services/core-programs/sustainable- [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Elkhayma, R. (2018). International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hossain, M. Z., Rahman, M. A. U., Rahaman, K. R., Ha-Mim, N. M., & Haque, S. F. (2020). Investigating the climate-induced livelihood vulnerability index in coastal areas of Bangladesh. World, 1(2), 12– 170. https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jworld/v1y2020i2p12-170d413674.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Lacey, A. T., Toossi, M., Dubina, K. S., & Gensler, A. B. (2017). Projections overview and highlights, 2016–26. Monthly Labor Review. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2017/article/projections-overview-and-highlights- 2016-26.htm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Naganag, E. M. (2022). Readiness of the Beneficiaries to Engage in Sustainable Livelihood Program (SLP) as basis for intervention. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 7(6), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.76.46 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ocampo, N. C., Vigonte, F., & Abante, M. V. (2024). Government interventions in the field of social welfare in the Philippines: The fabric of society. Available at SSRN 4730551. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4730551 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Onyeyirichi, O. A., Kumar, P., & Choudhary, P. (2025). Rural multidimensional poverty and livelihood mix: Evidence from India. Social Indicators Research, 170(2), 521–548. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-025-03285-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Orbeta, A. C., Jr. (2020). Impacts of the Sustainable Livelihood Program’s microenterprise assistance on poor households (Discussion Paper No. 2020-04). Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://www.3ieimpact.org/sites/default/files/2020-11/GFR- PWP.02.DSWD_.IE-Impacts-SL-MD-SCF-Philippines.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Orbeta, A. C., Jr., Ballesteros, M. M., Corpus, J. P. P., Paqueo, V. B., & Reyes, C. M. (2020). Impacts of the Sustainable Livelihood Program’s microenterprise development assistance with seed capital fund on poor households in the Philippines (Discussion Paper No. 2036). Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/241025/1/pidsdps2036.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Pandey, V., Gupta, A., & Gupta, S. (2019). Labor and welfare impacts of a large-scale livelihoods program: Quasi-experimental evidence from India (Policy Research Working Paper No. 8883). The World Bank. https://hdl.handle.net/10986/31873 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Petallo, D. (2024). Socioeconomic impact of Department of Social Welfare and Development’s (DSWD’s) implementation of Sustainable Livelihood Program (SLP) 2021 at Del Carmen, Siargao Islands, Surigao Del Norte. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384712652 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Petallo, D. J. M. (2024). Socioeconomic Impact of Department of Social Welfare and Development’s (DSWD’S) Implementation of Sustainable Livelihood Program (SLP) 2021 At Del Carmen, Siargao Islands, Surigao Del Norte. Socioeconomic Impact of Department of Social Welfare and Development’s (DSWD’S) Implementation of Sustainable Livelihood Program (SLP) 2021 At Del Carmen, Siargao Islands, Surigao Del Norte, 1(2), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.69481/vrtlscid1005202 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Reyes, C. M., PIDS, Paqueo, V. B., PIDS, Corpus, J. P. P., & PIDS. (2020). Impacts of the Sustainable Livelihood Program’s microenterprise assistance on poor households in the Philippines. In The Grantee Final Report. https://www.3ieimpact.org/sites/default/files/2020-11/GFR-PWP.02.DSWD_.IE-Impacts-SL-MD-SCF-Philippines.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Romano, N. P., Castro, E. T., Jr, Lozano, E. J., Sitones, M. L. A., & Borbon, M. G. (2022). Sustainable Livelihood Program and Peace development among the marginalized citizens in Butuan City, Philippines. The International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention, 9(09), 7182–7188. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsshi/v9i09.01 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Serrat, O. (2017). The sustainable livelihoods approach. In Knowledge solutions (pp. 21–26). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0983-9_5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Xu, L., Chen, M., & Thompson, R. (2024). Reciprocal relationships between social capital dimensions: A multi-country analysis. Social Capital Review, 12(1), 78-105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. https://doi.org/10.1080/socialcapitalreview.2024.0987654 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Xu, S., Teng, W., & Peng, T. Q. (2024, July 25). The relationship among generalized trust, social networks, and social resources. Social Networks, 77(2), 156–172. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02685809241251770 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar