Designing Competency-Oriented Learning Games for Grade 3 Natural and Social Sciences: Supporting Observation, Evidence-Based Reasoning, and Problem Solving

Authors

Hang Nguyen Thi Thu

Faculty of Primary Education, Thai Nguyen University of Education, Thai Nguyen University, Thai Nguyen (Vietnam)

Le Thi Thu Hien

Viet Lap Primary School, Tan Yen Commune, Bac Ninh Province (Vietnam)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100701138

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 16642-16650

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-10

Accepted: 2026-08-15

Published: 2026-08-22

Abstract

Learning games are common in primary classrooms, yet they are often used mainly for motivation or review rather than as structured environments for inquiry. This study developed and preliminarily evaluated a competency-oriented system of learning games for Grade 3 Natural and Social Sciences in Vietnam. The study comprised three phases: a descriptive needs analysis with 32 teachers and 118 Grade 3 students; development of a five-step design process and a 12-game system; and a seven-lesson quasi-experimental pilot with 77 students in two intact classes (experimental n = 41; control n = 36). For international interpretation, the original inquiry indicators were analytically mapped onto three interconnected functions: purposeful observation; evidence-based reasoning, including simple prediction or judgment when tasks permitted; and contextual problem solving. The mapping was conceptual and did not create new psychometric subscales. Before the intervention, no statistically significant difference in total test scores was detected between groups, Welch's t(74.57) = 0.30, p = .763, d = 0.07. At post-test, the experimental class scored higher (M = 8.22, SD = 1.13) than the control class (M = 7.06, SD = 1.35), Welch's t(68.55) = 4.07, p < .001, 95% CI [0.59, 1.73], d = 0.94. Process records indicated that the intervention created more structured opportunities for students to generate questions, record observations, justify classifications, and defend decisions. Because the available dataset contains total scores rather than validated skill-specific subscales, the findings support the feasibility and integrated inquiry value of the system, not separate causal effects on observation, reasoning, or problem solving.

Keywords

game-based learning; inquiry competence; evidence-based reasoning; problem solving; primary education

Downloads

References

1. Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining "gamification". In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (pp. 9-15). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming, 33(4), 441-467. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878102238607 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Hainey, T., Connolly, T. M., Boyle, E. A., Wilson, A., & Razak, A. (2016). A systematic literature review of games-based learning empirical evidence in primary education. Computers & Education, 102, 202-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.09.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Heppt, B., Henschel, S., Hardy, I., & Gabler, K. (2023). Instructional support in inquiry-based elementary school science classes: How does it relate to students’ science content knowledge and academic language proficiency? European Journal of Psychology of Education, 38, 1377-1401. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-022-00653-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Letina, A. (2021). Game-based learning in primary science and social studies. In ICERI2021 Proceedings (pp. 9239-9247). IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2021.2129 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Li, M.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). Game-based learning in science education: A review of relevant research. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(6), 877-898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9436-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ministry of Education and Training. (2018). General education curriculum: Natural and Social Sciences (issued with Circular No. 32/2018/TT-BGDĐT, December 26, 2018). Hanoi, Vietnam.. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Pedaste, M., Baucal, A., & Reisenbuk, E. (2021). Towards a science inquiry test in primary education: Development of items and scales. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, Article 19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00278-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Pham, V. Q., & Ly, P. T. (2024). Using folk games in Grade 2 Natural and Social Sciences teaching. Vietnam Journal of Education, 24(22), 48-53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Plass, J. L., Homer, B. D., & Kinzer, C. K. (2015). Foundations of game-based learning. Educational Psychologist, 50(4), 258-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1122533 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ta, T. K. N., & Tran, T. N. (2023). Designing learning games to develop competence in exploring the surrounding natural and social environment in Grade 3 Natural and Social Sciences. Journal of Educational Equipment, 303(December, Issue 2), 68-70.. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Zosh, J. M., Hopkins, E. J., Jensen, H., Liu, C., Neale, D., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Solis, S. L., & Whitebread, D. (2017). Learning through play: A review of the evidence (White paper). The LEGO Foundation. ISBN 978-87-999589-1-7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles