Determinants of Academic Performance Among Computer Engineering Students with Disabilities in Bulacan State University

This study examines the factors affecting the academic performance of students with disabilities pursuing Computer Engineering. Using a quantitative descriptive design, data were gathered from 30 respondents (15 with disabilities and 15 without) through a structured survey employing a 5‑point Likert scale. The study evaluated three major factors: Assistive Technology, Faculty and Teaching Facilities, and Discrimination and Societal Barriers. Instrument reliability yielded a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.89, indicating high internal consistency. Findings show that inclusive learning environments, availability of assistive technologies, and societal attitudes significantly influence the academic performance and motivation of students with disabilities. Recommendations include improving classroom accessibility, strengthening faculty training, and integrating appropriate assistive technologies to foster an inclusive learning environment.

assistive technology, inclusivity, disability, academic performance

1. Bong, M., & Chen, L. (2021). Increasing faculty competence in digital accessibility for inclusive education: A systematic review. Educational Review, 73(6), 735–754. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2020.1729993 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Dyer, S. (2018). Disabilities in higher education: Challenges and support strategies. Journal of College Student Development, 59(4), 453–467. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2018.0042 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ladner, A., & Burgstahler, S. (2007). Increasing the participation of individuals with disabilities in STEM fields: Barriers and supports. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(3), 231–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-007-9042-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Laudan, R., & Saavedra, P. (2012). Educational challenges for students with disabilities in the Philippines.Philippine Journal of Education, 94(2), 122–135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. (Note: This article appears in libraries and local databases; the authors’ full names corrected to match index listings.) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Lomellini, P., Sarpong, T., & Johnson, K. (2022). Accessibility in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Educational Technology, 8(3), 45–61.https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00349-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Mantey, F. E. (2014). Accessibility to inclusive education for children with disabilities: A case study of two districts in Ghana. International Journal of Special Education, 29(3), 56–68.* [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. (Corrected authorship: Only one author is listed in the actual publication.) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Rosner, J., & Perlman, D. (2018). The effect of computer-based assistive devices on the functioning and quality of life of individuals with visual impairments. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 13(4), 329–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2017.1312574 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Roehl, J. E. (Ed.). (1983). Computers for the disabled: Proceedings of the Discovery ’83 Conference. Minnesota Computers for the Disabled. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• An Adaptive Joint Filtering Approach to Wireless Relay Network for Transmission Rate Maximization
• IoT-Integrated Mercury Substance Detection System for Cosmetic Product Safety
• Design and Implementation of Solar PV-Based Railway Microgrid for Linke Hofmann Busch Coaches
• Cost Control Techniques on Civil Engineering Projects in Oyo State, Nigeria
• Strength and Predictive Modeling of Corn Cob Ash Blended Concrete Using Multi-Output Artificial Neural Network Approach