Determinants of Moringa Marketing-Channel Choice Among Smallholder Value-Chain Actors in Semi-Arid Makueni County, Kenya

Authors

Wellington Kasee Mulinge

PhD Candidate; South Eastern Kenya University, School of Agriculture, Environment, Water and Natural Resources, Kenya. (Kenya)

Prof. Jacinta M. Kimiti

Professor; South Eastern Kenya University, School of Agriculture, Environment, Water and Natural Resources, Kenya. (Kenya)

Dr. Stephen Cavers

UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, United Kingdom. (Kenya)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1308000222

Subject Category: Agriculture, Environment, Water and Natural Resources

Volume/Issue: 13/8 | Page No: 3603-3615

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-09-03

Accepted: 2026-09-08

Published: 2026-09-17

Abstract

Marketing-channel choice is an important component of agricultural commercialization because alternative channels differ in price incentives, transaction costs, market accessibility, buyer reliability and volume requirements. This study examined the factors influencing Moringa marketing-channel choice among value-chain actors in Kibwezi East and West Sub-Counties of Makueni County, Kenya. Primary data were collected using structured questionnaires from 650 Moringa value-chain actors comprising producers, middlemen or brokers, retailers, wholesalers, processors and consumers. Descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression were used to analyse the determinants of marketing-channel choice. Eight explanatory variables were included in the final model: price received, distance to market, quantity marketed, trust in the buyer, transport accessibility, education level, farming experience and land allocated to Moringa. The logistic regression model was statistically significant (Model χ² = 124.83, p < 0.001), with a Cox and Snell R² of 0.39 and Nagelkerke R² of 0.47. The model correctly classified 76.9% of observations, while the Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was non-significant (p = 0.624), indicating an adequate model fit. Price received was positively associated with marketing-channel choice (β = 0.021, OR = 1.021, p < 0.001), while distance to market had a negative association (β = −0.087, OR = 0.917, p < 0.001). Quantity marketed (β = 0.014, OR = 1.014, p < 0.001), trust in buyers (β = 0.563, OR = 1.756, p < 0.001), transport accessibility (β = 0.431, OR = 1.539, p < 0.001), and land allocated to Moringa (β = 0.392, OR = 1.480, p = 0.001) were also positively associated with channel choice. Education and farming experience were not statistically significant. The findings demonstrate that Moringa marketing-channel decisions are shaped primarily by economic incentives, transaction costs, market accessibility, relational governance and production capacity rather than formal education or farming experience. Strengthening market information systems, transport infrastructure, aggregation arrangements, producer–buyer relationships and production capacity could expand smallholder access to more attractive and reliable Moringa marketing channels in semi-arid Kenya.

Keywords

Moringa, marketing-channel choice, value chain, smallholders, market access, transaction costs, logistic regression, semi-arid Kenya

Downloads

References

1. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2014). Developing sustainable food value chains: Guiding principles. FAO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Gereffi, G. (1994). The organization of buyer-driven global commodity chains: How U.S. retailers shape overseas production networks. In G. Gereffi & M. Korzeniewicz (Eds.), Commodity chains and global capitalism (pp. 95–122). Praeger. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Gereffi, G., & Fernandez-Stark, K. (2016). Global value chain analysis: A primer (2nd ed.). Duke University, Center on Globalization, Governance & Competitiveness. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290500049805 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Gopalakrishnan, L., Doriya, K., & Kumar, D. S. (2016). Moringa oleifera: A review on nutritive importance and its medicinal application. Food Science and Human Wellness, 5(2), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fshw.2016.04.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kaplinsky, R., & Morris, M. (2002). A handbook for value chain research. Institute of Development Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kumssa, D. B., Joy, E. J. M., Young, S. D., Odee, D. W., Ander, E. L., Broadley, M. R., & others. (2017). Challenges and opportunities for Moringa growers in southern Ethiopia and Kenya. PLOS ONE, 12(11), e0187651. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187651 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics (pp. 105–142). Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. OECD/FAO. (2021). OECD-FAO agricultural outlook 2021–2030. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/19428846-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. United Nations Industrial Development Organization. (2015). Agribusiness development: Transforming rural economies through value addition. UNIDO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles