Determinants of Patients' Intention to Use IoT-Based Remote Patient Monitoring Systems in Malaysia
Authors
Muhammad Sabaruddin Bin Ramlan Mahidin
Faculty of Technology Management and Technopreneurship, University Technical Malaysia Melaka, 75450, Ayer Keroh, Melaka (Malaysia)
Pm Ts Dr Nurulizwa binti Abdul Rashid
Faculty of Technology Management and Technopreneurship, University Technical Malaysia Melaka, Centre of Technoprenuership Development, 75450, Ayer Keroh, Melaka (Malaysia)
Yasmin Dania Binti Khairul Hisham
Faculty of Technology Management and Technopreneurship, University Technical Malaysia Melaka, 75450, Ayer Keroh, Melaka (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800597
Subject Category: Social science
Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 8948-8955
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-08-26
Accepted: 2026-08-31
Published: 2026-09-12
Abstract
Continuous remote patient monitoring (RPM) is essential for digital health transitions, yet patient adoption remains low in Malaysia. This study integrates the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework with the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2) to propose a multi-level model of RPM adoption. Technology Awareness is introduced as a novel mediator bridging psychological factors (Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy, Social Influence, Facilitating Conditions, and Health Awareness) and the Intention to Adopt RPM. The model also addresses critical security and privacy vulnerabilities inherent in real-time medical IoT streaming. Our findings expect that Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy, Social Influence, Facilitating Conditions, and Health Awareness significantly influence the Intention to Adopt RPM and Technology Awareness, with the latter acting as a crucial mediator.
Keywords
Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM); Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE); UTAUT2; Technology Awareness; IoT Security
Downloads
References
1. H. D. Dewadas et al., "Digitalisation in Healthcare: A Review of Present Developments in Malaysia,", Malaysian Journal of Digital Health, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 54–72, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. J. D. Bokefode and G. Komarasamy, "A Remote Patient Monitoring System: Need, Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities,", Healthcare Accessibility and Technology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 239–253, 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. N. D. Azeez and N. Y. Mohammed, "Factors Influencing Adoption of Mobile Health Monitoring System: Extending UTAUT2 with Trust,", International Journal of Healthcare Informatics, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 120–134, 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. C. A. N. Malarvizhi, S. R. Manzoor, and R. Haque, "Revisiting the Extended IoT Use Behavior Model Among Senior NCD Patients for Smart Healthcare in Malaysia,", International Journal of Smart Healthcare, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 45–68, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Z. Ashfaq, A. Rafay, R. Mumtaz, S. M. H. Zaidi, H. Saleem, S. A. R. Zaidi, S. Mumtaz, and A. Haque, "A Review of Enabling Technologies for Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) Ecosystem,", Ain Shams Engineering Journal, vol. 13, no. 4, Art. no. 101660, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. C. Malarvizhi, S. S. Subramaniam, and S. Jayashree, "Exploring the Impact of IoT Adoption on Elderly Non-Communicable Disease Patients: Attitudes, Subjective Norms, and Perceived Behavioral Control in Malaysia,", Journal of Behavioral Robotics, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 106–121, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. H. H. M. Jawad, Z. B. Hassan, and B. B. Zaidan, "Factors Influencing the Behavioural Intention of Patients with Chronic Diseases to Adopt IoT-Healthcare Services in Malaysia,", Journal of Healthcare Innovation, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 99–112, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. V. Venkatesh, J. Y. Thong, and X. Xu, "Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2),", MIS Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 157–178, 2012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. A. Alaiad and L. Zhou, "Patients' Adoption of WSN-Based Smart Home Healthcare Systems: An Integrated Model of Facilitators and Barriers,", IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 4–23, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Y. K. Dwivedi, N. P. Rana, A. Jeyaraj, M. Clement, and M. D. Williams, "Re-examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Towards a Revised Theoretical Model,", Information Systems Frontiers, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 719–734, 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. C.-R. Su, J. Hajiyev, C. J. Fu, K.-C. Kao, C.-H. Chang, and C.-T. Chang, "A Novel Framework for a Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) System with Abnormality Detection,", Journal of Medical IoT Research, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 88–105, 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. M. H. S. Yin, R. Balakrishnan, A. Vasudevan, S. Ramachandran, H. Fan, and M. S. C. Rusuli, "Factors influencing telehealth adoption among consumers in Malaysia,", Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, vol. 8, no. 13, Art. no. 6114, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. S.-H. Tan, C.-K. Wong, Y.-Y. Yap, and S.-K. Tan, "Factors influencing telemedicine adoption among physicians in the Malaysian healthcare system: A revisit,", Digital Health, vol. 10, pp. 1–26, 2024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. N. N. Omar, A. S. A. Bakar, N. H. Hassan, M. S. A. Rashid, S. N. A. Malek, and C. N. A. S. C. Zainal, "A Comparison Study on User Acceptance of Digital Healthcare Services among M40 and B40 Community in Selangor: A Study on SELangkah Application,", Journal of Advanced Research Design, vol. 129, no. 1, pp. 75–88, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. M. N. H. Zarki and S. Usman, "IoT Data Breaches and Privacy Issues in Healthcare System,", Open International Journal of Informatics, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 41–55, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. J. Jeevajothi Nathan, A. Abdullah, J. Evans, S. N. Ramdzan, M. Fletcher, N. Hussein, N. S. Hanafi, and E. M. Khoo; on behalf of the RESPIRE Collaboration, "Scaling digital health in low- and middle-income countries: lessons from Malaysia's cross-sector capacity-building approach,", Journal of Global Health, vol. 15, Art. no. 03044, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. S. C. Catapan et al., "A systematic review of consumers' and healthcare professionals' adoption of digital healthcare,", npj Digital Medicine, vol. 8, Art. no. 127, 2025. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. S. Abdulmalek, A. Nasir, W. A. Jabbar, M. A. M. Almuhaya, A. K. Bairagi, M. A.-M. Khan, and S.-H. Kee, “IoT-based healthcare-monitoring system towards improving quality of life: A review,” Healthcare, vol. 10, no. 10, Art. no. 1993, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10101993 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. B. Charyyev, M. Mansouri, and M. H. Gunes, “Modeling the adoption of Internet of Things in healthcare: A systems approach,” in 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering (ISSE), 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSE51541.2021.9582493 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. D. El Majdoubi, H. El Bakkali, and S. Sadki, “The systematic literature review of privacy-preserving solutions in smart healthcare environment,” Security and Communication Networks, vol. 2022, Art. no. 5642026, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5642026 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. S. Marston, Z. Li, S. Bandyopadhyay, J. Zhang, and A. Ghalsasi, “Cloud computing—The business perspective,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 176–189, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.12.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. F. Masmali, S. J. Miah, and N. Noman, “Different applications and technologies of Internet of Things (IoT),” arXiv, 2021. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2110.10452 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. D. Miorandi, S. Sicari, F. De Pellegrini, and I. Chlamtac, “Internet of things: Vision, applications and research challenges,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 1497–1516, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2012.02.016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. M. Shukla, D. Sethi, L. Bindal, K. Mani, K. Upadhyay, and M. Sharma, “Patient monitoring system using blockchain and IoT technology,” Recent Advances in Electrical & Electronic Engineering, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 449–459, 2023. https://doi.org/10.2174/2352096516666221026092345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. N. Uka and P. Okunji, “Could remote patient monitoring (RPM) be effectively used with elderly COPD patients without limitations?” Journal of Community Medicine & Public Health, vol. 7, no. 3, Art. no. 331, 2023. https://doi.org/10.29011/2577-2228.100331 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
- Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
- Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
- The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
- Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar