Determinants of Post-Harvest Efficiency and Losses among Smallholder Lakatan Banana Farmers in Bukidnon, Philippines: Evidence from Fractional Logit and Two-Part Econometric Models

Authors

Dudge Latrelle C. Sabio

Graduating Students, Bachelor of Arts in Economics, College of Arts and Sciences, Bukidnon State University, Malaybalay City, Philippines (Philippines)

Jhon Rey T. Anduyan

Graduating Students, Bachelor of Arts in Economics, College of Arts and Sciences, Bukidnon State University, Malaybalay City, Philippines (Philippines)

Jim Paul G. Laspobres

Faculty, Economics Department, College of Arts and Sciences, Bukidnon State University, Malaybalay City, Philippines (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100600272

Subject Category: Economics

Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 3895-3929

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-27

Accepted: 2026-05-01

Published: 2026-06-22

Abstract

Post-harvest losses remain a major constraint to agricultural productivity, farm profitability, and food system efficiency, particularly in developing countries where inadequate post-harvest management and limited access to technologies contribute to substantial product deterioration. Despite the economic importance of Lakatan banana production in the Philippines, empirical evidence on the determinants of post-harvest efficiency and loss dynamics at the farm level remains limited. This study examined post-harvest efficiency and the determinants of post-harvest losses among Lakatan banana farmers in Valencia City and Impasug-ong, Bukidnon. Using cross-sectional data from 205 randomly selected farmers, the study employed a fractional logit model to analyze post-harvest efficiency and a two-part econometric framework consisting of a logistic regression model and a Gamma generalized linear model (GLM) to separately examine the occurrence and magnitude of post-harvest losses. Results showed that average post-harvest losses amounted to 148.45 kg per harvest, representing approximately 12.5% of total production, while mean post-harvest efficiency reached 87.49%. Fractional logit estimates revealed that gender, fertilizer application, and source of planting materials significantly influenced post-harvest efficiency. Female farmers exhibited higher efficiency levels, whereas excessive fertilizer application reduced efficiency. Farmers obtaining planting materials from external sources achieved significantly higher efficiency than those relying on self-sourced suckers. Logistic regression results indicated that gender, educational attainment, farm location, farming system, and fertilizer application significantly affected the probability of experiencing post-harvest losses. Conditional on positive losses, the Gamma GLM revealed that gender, farm size, farm location, fertilizer application, and farmgate price significantly influenced loss magnitude. Farmers located in Impasug-ong incurred substantially greater losses, while higher farmgate prices were associated with lower loss severity. The findings highlight the importance of farmer characteristics, input management, market incentives, and location-specific conditions in shaping post-harvest outcomes and underscore the need for targeted interventions to improve post-harvest management and reduce losses among smallholder Lakatan banana farmers.

Keywords

Lakatan banana; post-harvest efficiency; post-harvest losses; fractional logit model; two-part models

Downloads

References

1. Abraham, B. M., Saleh, B. K., & Zelelew, D. Z. (2022). Effect of post-harvest handling and ripening methods on quality and shelf-life of banana. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 13, 175–192. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2022.132011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ahlawat, S. (2025). Generalized linear model. In Statistical quantitative methods in finance. Apress. https://doi.org/10.1007/979-8-8688-0962-0_3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Allen, J. E., & Allen, J. E. (2014). Determinants of land allocation in a multi-crop farming system: An application of the fractional multinomial logit model to agricultural households in Mali. https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.170175 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ambuko, J. L., Sekozawa, Y., Sugaya, S., Itoh, F., Nakamura, K., & Gemma, H. (2006). Effect of seasonal variation, cultivar and production system on some postharvest characteristics of the banana. Acta Horticulturae, 712, 505–510. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2006.712.61 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ansah, I. G. K., & Tetteh, B. K. D. (2016). Determinants of yam postharvest management in the Zabzugu District of Northern Ghana. Advances in Agriculture, 2016, 9274017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9274017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Anzures, A. F., Hipolito, K., Pestolante, K., & Navarrete, A. F. (2022). Constraints in the primary production of bananas in the Davao Region, Philippines. International Journal of Social and Management Studies, 3(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.5555/ijosmas.v3i1.84 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Arunima, P. L., Gopinath, P. P., Lekshmi, P. R. G., & Esakkimuthu, M. (2024). Digital assessment of post-harvest Nendran banana for faster grading: CNN-based ripeness classification model. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 214, Article 112972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2024.112972 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bantayehu, M., & Alemayehu, M. (2020). Efficacy of postharvest technologies on ripening behavior and quality of banana varieties grown in Ethiopia. International Journal of Fruit Science, 20(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/15538362.2019.1583623 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Belotti, F., Deb, P., Manning, W. G., & Norton, E. C. (2015). twopm: Two-part models. The Stata Journal, 15(1), 3–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Davara, P. R., & Patel, N. C. (2009). Assessment of post harvest losses in banana grown in Gujarat. Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 4(2), 187–190. https://doi.org/10.24154/jhs.v4i2.544 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Debebe, S. (2022). Post-harvest losses of crops and its determinants in Ethiopia: Tobit model analysis. Agriculture & Food Security, 11, 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-022-00357-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. FAO. (2019). The state of food and agriculture 2019: Moving forward on food loss and waste reduction. Rome. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. FAO. (2020). Technical platform on the measurement and reduction of food loss and waste. Rome. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Gemechu, G. E., Abewoy, D., & Jaleto, K. (2021). Post-harvest loss assessment of banana (Musa spp.) at Jimma Town market. Journal of Plant Studies, 10(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.5539/jps.v10n1p23 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Guo, F., Wang, G., Innes, J. L., et al. (2015). Gamma generalized linear model to investigate the effects of climate variables on the area burned by forest fire in northeast China. Journal of Forestry Research, 26, 545–555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-015-0084-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Guo, J., Duan, J., Li, J., & Yang, Z. (2020). Mechanized technology research and equipment application of banana post-harvesting: A review. Agronomy, 10(3), 374. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10030374 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic econometrics (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Habib, N., Rankin, P., Alauddin, M., et al. (2023). Determinants of livelihood diversification in rural rain-fed region of Pakistan: Evidence from fractional multinomial logit (FMLOGIT) estimation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 13185–13196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23040-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hao, H., Yin, S., Liu, Z., & Liu, Z. (2022). Research on agricultural logistics efficiency based on DEA and Tobit regression models. Journal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés, 55(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.18280/jesa.550107 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Hodges, R. J., Buzby, J. C., & Bennett, B. (2014). Postharvest losses and waste in developed and less developed countries. Journal of Agricultural Science, 149(S1), 37–45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. (2013). Applied logistic regression (3rd ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kikulwe, E. M., Okurut, S., Ajambo, S., & Nowakunda, K. (2018). Postharvest losses and their determinants in banana value chains. African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 13(2), 139–154. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Koufie, A., & Darfor, K. N. (2026). Econometric and explainable machine learning framework for sustainable food systems in Ghana: The case of post-harvest yam losses (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 6439334). SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6439334 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Laborte, D. Z. (2016). Analysis of postharvest handling practices for Lakatan bananas among traders in selected markets in Calamba, Laguna, 2015 (Undergraduate Thesis No. 5573). University of the Philippines Los Baños. https://www.ukdr.uplb.edu.ph/etd-undergrad/5573 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Manning, W. G., & Mullahy, J. (2001). Estimating log models: To transform or not to transform? Journal of Health Economics, 20(4), 461–494. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Mark, N. B., Tamber, A. J., Igba, M., & Iortyer, K. A. (2025). A binary logistic regression model for assessing the effect of farmers-herders crisis on postharvest losses of crops in Benue State. International Journal of Research, 12(5). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15517867 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989). Generalized linear models (2nd ed.). Chapman & Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Midamba, D. C., & Kizito, O. (2022). Determinants of access to trainings on post-harvest loss management among maize farmers in Uganda: A binary logistic regression approach. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2148359 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Misango, V. G., Nzuma, J. M., Irungu, P., & Kassie, M. (2022). Intensity of adoption of integrated pest management practices in Rwanda: A fractional logit approach. Heliyon, 8(1), e08735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08735 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Mohapatra, D., Mishra, S., Singh, C. B., et al. (2011). Post-harvest processing of banana: Opportunities and challenges. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 4, 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-010-0377-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Murmu, S. B., & Mishra, H. N. (2018). Post-harvest shelf-life of banana and guava: Mechanisms of common degradation problems and emerging counteracting strategies. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 49, 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2018.07.011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Nayak, A. K., Singh, N., & Kumar, D. (2018). An economic study of post-harvest losses of banana in Durg District of Chhattisgarh. International Research Journal of Agricultural Economics and Statistics, 9(1), 82–89. https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/IRJAES/9.1/82-89 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Ngowi, E. R., & Selejio, O. (2019). Post-harvest loss and adoption of improved post-harvest storage technologies by smallholder maize farmers in Tanzania. https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.285010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Nkwain, K., Odiaka, E., Ikwuba, A., & Nkwi, G. E. (2022). Analysis of post-harvest losses of banana and the economic wellbeing of farmers in Boyo Division, North West Region of Cameroon. Dutse Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 7(4b). https://doi.org/10.4314/dujopas.v7i4b.14 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Papke, L. E., & Wooldridge, J. M. (1996). Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(k) plan participation rates. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11(6), 619–632. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(199611)11:6<619::AID-JAE418>3.0.CO;2-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Peduzzi, P., Concato, J., Kemper, E., Holford, T. R., & Feinstein, A. R. (1996). A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49(12), 1373–1379. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00236-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Qange, S., Mdoda, L., & Mditshwa, A. (2024). Modeling the critical causal factors of postharvest losses in the vegetable supply chain in eThekwini Metropolitan Municipality: The log-linear regression model. Heliyon, 10(23), e39565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39565 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Quevedo, M. A., Ramos, A. D., Sta. Iglesia, N. M., & Notarte, K. B. V. (2017). Postharvest handling intervention for banana var. Latundan grown in marginal upland areas in Inopacan, Leyte. Annals of Tropical Research, 39(Supplement A), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.32945/atr39sa5.2017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Ramalho, E. A., Ramalho, J. J. S., & Henriques, P. D. (2010). Fractional regression models for second stage DEA efficiency analyses. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 34, 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-010-0184-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Ruiz Medina, M. D., & Ruales, J. (2024). Post-harvest alternatives in banana cultivation. Agronomy, 14(9), 2109. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14092109 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Saha, C. K., Ahamed, M. K., Hosen, M. S., Nandi, R., & Kabir, M. (2021). Post-harvest losses of banana in fresh produce marketing chain in Tangail District of Bangladesh. Journal of Bangladesh Agricultural University, 19(3), 389–397. https://doi.org/10.5455/JBAU.74902 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Salinas Ruíz, J., Montesinos López, O. A., Hernández Ramírez, G., & Crossa Hiriart, J. (2023). Generalized linear mixed models with applications in agriculture and biology. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32800-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Salinas Ruíz, J., Montesinos López, O. A., Hernández Ramírez, G., & Crossa Hiriart, J. (2023). Generalized linear models. In Generalized linear mixed models with applications in agriculture and biology (pp. xx–xx). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32800-8_2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Tolesa, G. N., Workneh, T. S., & Melesse, S. F. (2018). Logistic regression analysis of marketability of tomato fruit harvested at different maturity stages and subjected to disinfection, storage condition and storage period treatments. Biological Agriculture & Horticulture, 34(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.2017.1368414 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles