Developing a Combined VARK and Social Condition Dominance Diagnostic to Optimise Student Learning Experiences

Traditional higher education models frequently rely on a “one size fits all” approach to instructional delivery, which can lead to significant students’ learning difficulties and diminished motivation. While sensory preference models like Neil Fleming’s VARK (Visual, Auditory, Reading, Kinaesthetic) have been widely adopted to personalise learning, they often fail to account for the social conditions and environmental preferences under which information processing occurs. This action research study investigates the design, development, and empirical deployment of SoVARK. This novel digital diagnostic tool integrates VARK sensory modalities with social condition learning dominance to map student learning preferences. Deployed digitally to a cohort of undergraduate students (N = 123, unique respondents = 97), the diagnostic revealed a critical baseline of student needs: 74.8% of the cohort preferred processing information under Solo (47.2%) or Reflective (27.6%) conditions, with Visual-Solo (28.5%) emerging as the single most dominant combined learning profile. By mapping these multidimensional learning preferences, SoVARK provides immediate, automated, and personalised feedback through digital flipbooks containing a custom study strategy known as The Success Blueprint. This study demonstrates how low-cost, scalable digital diagnostics can be successfully developed and implemented to optimise student learning experiences, enhance self-directed learning, and provide concrete, verifiable evidence of educational innovation for academic promotion audits.

VARK; Social Learning Styles; Personalised Learning

1. Anas, N., Ramly, M. K. A., Noor, S. N. A. M., & Noor, A. M. (2021). Assessing student learning style preferences during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 67–73. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Chaudhry, N. A., Ashar, A., & Ahmad, S. A. (2020). Association of Visual, Aural, Read/Write, and Kinesthetic (VARK) learning styles and academic performances of dental students: Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, 70(Suppl-1), S58-63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Dantas, L. A., & Cunha, A. (2020). An integrative debate on learning styles and the learning process. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2(1), Article 100017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Devi, K. D., Devi, C. B., & Khogendra, C. (2026). Study habits, learning styles, and academic performance of pre-service teachers undergoing teacher education courses at Manipur University in India. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 13(1), Article 102480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102480 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. El-Sabagh, H. A. (2021). Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on development students’ engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, Article 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00289-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. El-Saftawy, E., Abdel Latif, A. A., ShamsEldeen, A. M., Alghamdi, M. A., Mahfoz, A. M., & Aboulhoda, B. E. (2024). Influence of applying VARK learning styles on enhancing teaching skills: Application of learning theories. BMC Medical Education, 24, Article 1034. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05979-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Fleming, N. D., & Baume, D. (2006). Learning styles again: VARKing up the right tree! Educational Developments, 7(4), 4-7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Fleming, N. D., & Mills, C. (1992). Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection. To Improve the Academy, 11(1), 137–155. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Grasha, A. F. (1996). Teaching with style: A practical guide to enhancing learning by understanding teaching and learning styles. Alliance Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hockings, C., Thomas, L., Ottaway, J., & Jones, R. (2018). Independent learning – what we do when you're not there. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(2), 145-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1332031 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Katsaris, I., & Vidakis, N. (2021). Adaptive e-learning systems through learning styles: A review of the literature. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 1(2), 124-145. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2021.02.007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kenanoğlu, R., & Kahyaoğlu, M. (2024). An investigation on secondary education students’ learning styles and use of social networks. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(2), 67-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.105380/mojet.2024.12.1.506 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Norasmah Othman, & Mohd Hasril Amiruddin. (2010). Different perspectives of learning styles from VARK model. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7(C), 652–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.088 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Nurasma’ Shamsuddin. (2020). Students’ learning style and its effect on blended learning, does it matter? International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(1), 195-202. http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i1.20456 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Payaprom, S., & Payaprom, Y. (2020). Identifying learning styles of language learners: A useful step in moving towards the learner-centred approach. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(1), 59-72. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.712646 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Rawat, S., Makwana, K. K., Pathak, R. R., & Rathod, N. M. (2023). Identification of preferred learning styles as per VARK model in the undergraduate medical students. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 13, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.5455/njppp.2023.13.06280202207032023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Riechmann, S. W., & Grasha, A. F. (1974). A rational approach to developing and assessing the construct validity of a student learning style scales instrument. Journal of Psychology, 87(2), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1974.9915693 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Rumiantsev, T., van der Rijst, R., & Admiraal, W. (2023). A systematic literature review of collaborative learning in conservatoire education. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8, Article 100683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100683 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Sejdiu Shala, D., Thaçi, E., & Shala, A. (2024). Learning Styles and Motivation: Their Role in Academic Performance. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 14(3), 258. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2024-0071 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Sheridan, L., Wentworth, I., & Gigliotti, A. (2026). Learning ecologies and collaborative reflective practices in higher education. Educational Research and Evaluation, 32, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2026.2029389 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Sim, S., & Mohd Matore, M. E. (2022). Evaluation of learning styles and teaching styles: Psychometric validation of educational preferences. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1028145. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1028145 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Siti Nur Aishah Mohd Noor, & Mohd Khairul Amri Ramly. (2023). Bridging learning styles and student preferences in construction technology education: VARK model analysis. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 12(3), 2075-2083. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study