Development of Interactive Storybook for Improved Comprehension in Science

Authors

Ma. Cazzanda Camelle V. Valdez

Master of Arts in Education – Reading, Department of Professional Education, College of Education, Mindanao State University – Iligan Institute of Technology, Philippines (Philippines)

Dr. Angeline P. Dinoro

Assistant Professor, Department of Professional Education, College of Education, Mindanao State University – Iligan Institute of Technology, (Philippines)

Dr. Venus Parmisana

Associate Professor, Department of English, College of Arts and Social Science, Mindanao State University –Iligan Institute of Technology (Philippines)

Dr. Ciedelle N. Grageda

Associate Professor, Department of Professional Education, College of Education, Mindanao State University – Iligan Institute of Technology (Philippines)

Dr. Monera Hadji-Salic Hairulla

Professor, Chairperson of the Department of Science and Mathematics Education, College of Education, Mindanao State University – Iligan Institute of Technology (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1026EDU0274

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/26 | Page No: 3508-3522

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-02

Accepted: 2026-05-07

Published: 2026-05-29

Abstract

The Philippines continues to be one of the nations with the lowest reading comprehension and science literacy scores, underscoring the critical need for innovative teaching strategies that simultaneously improve students' literacy abilities and scientific understanding. The goal of this study was to develop and evaluate an interactive storybook for the Grade 6 science lesson on mixture separation at Doña Juana Actub Lluch Memorial Central School, North II District, Division of Iligan City. The study was anchored on the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework, Constructivist Learning Theory, Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning, and Story-Based Learning. The study used a mixed-method approach that combined qualitative and quasi-experimental design. Seventy two sixth-grade students and science instructors participated in the study's preparation and assessment. A validated 30-item pretest and posttest to gauge learning progress and Learning Resources Management and Development System (LRMDS) evaluation sheets to assess the quality of materials were all used in the data collection process. The interactive storybook was developed methodically using the Successive Approximation Model (SAM), which ensured iterative design, feedback integration, and ongoing improvement. In order to improve learner engagement, comprehension, and retention, the developed material included narrative-driven information, multimedia features, interactive tasks, simulations, and audio-visual components. The results showed a statistically significant improvement between the pretest and posttest scores, indicating that the interactive storybook was successful in raising students' reading comprehension abilities, conceptual grasp of separating mixtures, and general level of learning engagement. Additionally, teachers acknowledged the material's efficacy in fostering inquiry-based learning, motivation, teamwork, and meaningful classroom engagement, while students found it interesting, relatable, and simple to comprehend. The findings imply that including interactive storybooks into scientific lessons can be an effective strategy for filling in primary students' literacy and science learning gaps.

Keywords

Interactive Storybook, Science Education, Separating Mixtures, Story-Based Learning, SAM Model, Instructional Material Development, Grade 6 learners

Downloads

References

1. Abao, S. L. (2025). The link between reading proficiency and academic achievement among JHS students. International Journal of Progressive Research in Engineering Management and Science. https://doi.org/10.58257/IJPREMS38116 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Acita, D. (2022). Challenges, Difficulties, and Effective Enactment of Remedial Reading Programs: A Qualitative-Phenomenological Approach. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 5(7), 1-1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Adil, J. M. G., Salic Hairulla, M. A., Dinoro, A. P., Madale, V. A., & Ellare, A. O. (2025). Edumation: The development of animated storytelling instructional material. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 90500096. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.90500096 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Agonas, K. C., Codilla, L. L., Goloran, R., & Canomay, K. M. (2024, December). Readiness and Challenges Faced by Elementary Public School Teachers on Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Integration in the Philippines. In 2024 International Conference on TVET Excellence & Development (ICTeD) (pp. 162-165). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ambalong, M., & Playda, J. (2024). Effectiveness of Developed Interactive eBooks in Enhancing the Learners’ Reading Comprehension in Science. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 19(5), 1-1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Anwar, I. W., & Sailuddin, S. P. (2022). Academic reading difficulties in higher education. JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 10(2), 309-314. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Azores, A. E., & Velasco, C. Q. (2025). Use of interactive video story in enhancing the reading comprehension of Grade Six pupils. International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, 4(6). https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2025.v4i6n17 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Basister, M. P., Petersson, J., & Baconguis, R. D. T. (2025). Educational innovations for an inclusive learning environment: insights from the teachers’ collaboration through lesson study. Frontiers in Education, 10:1610749. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Boateng, S. (2024). Assessing conceptual difficulties experienced by pre-service chemistry teachers in organic chemistry. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(2), em2398. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Burak, D. & Gultekin, M. (2021). Verbal-Visual Learning Styles Scale: Developing a Scale for Primary School [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Students. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences (IJonSES), 3(2), 287-303. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonses.171 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Chen, F. Z., Chen, L. A., Tseng, C. C., Pai, C. H., Tsai, K. E., Liang, E. C., ... & Chen, C. W. (2025). Enhancing student engagement and learning outcomes in life sciences: implementing interactive learning environments and flipped classroom models. Discover Education, 4(1), 102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Cosentino, G., Gelsomini, M., Sharma, K., et al. (2025). Students’ experience and learning outcomes in multisensory environments: The moderating role of interaction modalities. Smart Learning Environments, 12, Article 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00402-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Cultura, J. F., Cubillas, A. U., & Cubillas, T. E. (2025). Beyond awareness: An assessment of reading program implementation in Butuan City, Philippines. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 14(6), 5140–5150. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Datugan, K. V., & Cabal, E. M. (2023). E-Learning Competencies for Elementary School Teachers in Botolan, Zambales, Philippines. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 4(8), 3058-3070. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Department of Education. (2019). National Report of the Philippines. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/PISA-2018-Philippine-National-Report.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Duterte, J. P. (2024). Technology-enhanced learning environments: Improving engagement and learning. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Edulan, J. M. R., Galvan, N. G., Yangyang, K. Q. E., Clarin, A. S., & Vallejo, J. H. (2025). The use of technology in instruction, students’ learning styles, and their academic performance in English. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Esleta, L. L., Onquit, I. O., Balitaon, A. G., & Aguila, A. R. V. (2024). Reading ability and academic achievement. In Proceedings of The Asian Conference on Education & International Development 2024. International Academic Forum (IAFOR). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Faizah, A. N., Purwati, P. D., & Murtini, T. (2024). Digital storytelling animation media with minimum competency assessment to enhancing students’ folktales reading comprehension. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 8(1), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v8i1.67243 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Galimpin, J. L. (2024). Enhancing mathematics and science learning through improved reading comprehension: A systematic literature review. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 10(7). https://doi.org/10.36713/epra2013 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Ganaden, A. S. (2022, May 12). Learners’ reading skills during the pandemic. Sulong [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Udyong.http://www.udyong.gov.ph/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=11240:learners-reading-skills during-the-pandemic&catid=90&Itemid=1368 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Halimova, M. (2025). The impact of digital storytelling on students’ creativity and communication skills. Journal of Applied Science and Social Science, 15(10), 1499–1504. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Jumawan, M. (2022). Needs assessment for the development of digital instructional materials. Philippine Journal of Educational Research, 15(1), 102–118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Kurniadin, M. Z. (2025). The Role of Interactive E-Books in Enhancing Science Literacy: A Review of Studies from 2015 to 2024. International Journal of Science Education and Science, 2(1), 17-25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Mastul, A. R. H., de Vera, C. T., & Jayme, C. B. (2023). Understanding the use of EduTech in schools in the Philippines: Recommendations for effectiveness. Engineering Science Letter, 2(02), 37-40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Nabilah, S., & Saefulloh, S. ASSESSING STUDENTS’MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT PURE SUBSTANCES, MIXTURES, AND SEPARATION OF MIXTURES USING A FOUR-TIER DIAGNOSTIC TEST. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 29(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Nasir, W. M. F. W. M., Halim, L., & Arsad, N. M. (2024). Digital storytelling learning outcomes and critical factors: A scoping review. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(5), 323–344. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Nasir, W. M. F. W. M., Halim, L., & Arsad, N. M. (2024). Digital storytelling learning outcomes and critical factors: A scoping review. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(5), 323–344. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Nurhidayah, F. N., & Wibowo, S. E. (2025). Improving Children's Digital Literacy: A Quantitative Study on the Use of Digital Storybooks in Elementary Schools. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 9(2), 252-262. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Nuroh, E. Z., Kusumawardana, M. D., & Destiana, E. (2022). Developing Digital Literacy Skill for Initial Teacher Education through Digital Storytelling. KnE Social Sciences, 475-496. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. OECD. (2022). Education GPS- Philippines- Student performance (PISA 2022). Retrieved from OECD Education GPS [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Ozaydin Ozkara, B., & Ibili, E. (2021). Analysis of Students’ e-Learning Styles and their Attitudes and SelfEfficacy Perceptions towards Distance Education. International Journal of Technology in Education and [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Science (IJTES), 5(4), 550-570. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.200 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Palines, K. M. E., & Cruz, R. A. O. D. (2021). Facilitating factors of scientific literacy skills development among junior high school students. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 9(1), 546-569. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Ridha, M., & Fithriani, A. (2025). Integrating digital technologies into teaching: A study on pre-service language teachers’ perceptions and practice. Education and Information Technologies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Rosyid, A., Fauzia, N., Darma, D. B., Abida, F. I. N., & Iye, R. (2025). The impact of digital storytelling applications on enhancing critical thinking abilities in higher education students. Room of Civil Society Development Journal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Saborío Taylor, S. (2025). Multisensory strategies to foster autonomous language learning through digital landscapes. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 6(1), e02503. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejimed/16045 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Sulastri, Nasution, W., & Rakhmawati, F. (2024). Interactive digital storybook: ICT based innovation in learning the history of Islamic culture. Journal of Islamic Education, 9(1), 339–358. https://doi.org/10.52615/jie.v9i1.401 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Suparman, A. R., Rohaeti, E., & Wening, S. (2024). Student misconception in chemistry: A systematic literature review. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 14(2), 238-252. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Suparman, A., Widodo, A., & Nurhayati, L. (2024). Teachers’ perceptions and challenges in integrating digital storytelling in classroom instruction. International Journal of Educational Technology in Learning, 9(2), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.20448/ijetl.v9i2.456 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Tee, Y. L., & Samah, N. A. (2025). Exploring the impact of EPUB based digital storytelling on Year 4 students’ narrative writing in a Malaysian primary classroom: A qualitative single case study. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 4878–4889. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.907000395 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. (2021). TIMSS 2019 International Results in Mathematics and Science. Retrieved from https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Upula, B. E. (2025). The Effectiveness of Interactive Teaching Methods in Enhancing Students’ Learning Outcomes in Biology. Scientia. Technology, Science and Society, 2(1), 144-151. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Urbano, C. M., Gumangan, M. A., Gustilo, L., & Capacete, M. P. A. (2021). Reading and writing needs of senior high school students: The case of Filipino students in the Philippines. Modern Journal of Studies in English Language Teaching and Literature, 3(1), 140-166. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Zhang, X., Tlili, A., Shubeck, K., Hu, X., Huang, R., & Zhu, L. (2021). Teachers’ adoption of an open and interactive e-book for teaching K-12 students Artificial Intelligence: a mixed methods inquiry. Smart Learning Environments, 8(1), 34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Zillmer, D., & Mussmann, T. (2023). Improving Student Performance with ILS Based Student-Teacher Pairings. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles