Development of STEM Physics Teaching Kit on Light
Authors
Department of Science and Mathematics Education, College of Education, Mindanao State University- Iligan Institute of Technology (Philippines)
Department of Science and Mathematics Education, College of Education, Mindanao State University- Iligan Institute of Technology (Philippines)
Department of Science and Mathematics Education, College of Education, Mindanao State University- Iligan Institute of Technology (Philippines)
Department of Science and Mathematics Education, College of Education, Mindanao State University- Iligan Institute of Technology (Philippines)
Department of Physics, College of Science and Mathematics, Mindanao State University- Iligan Institute of Technology (Philippines)
Department of Physics, College of Science and Mathematics, Mindanao State University- Iligan Institute of Technology (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100600294
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 4258-4265
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-05-28
Accepted: 2026-06-06
Published: 2026-06-22
Abstract
Physics education is vital in fostering critical thinking, creativity, and problem-solving skills, yet it is often perceived as difficult and abstract by high school students. This study developed a STEM Physics Teaching Kit on light for Grade 10 learners using the research and development design featuring quantitative expert validation. The kit comprised lesson plans, teacher and student guides, worksheets, and pretest–posttest assessments aligned with the K to 12 Science Curriculum Guide. Needs assessment revealed that light was the least mastered topic, with a mastery percentage of 25.67%. Expert validators, including science teachers and STEM specialists, rated the teaching kit as excellent. Their feedback emphasized contextual relevance, clarity, and integration of STEM elements. The kit’s design emphasized experiential, inquiry-based, and constructivist approaches, connecting physics concepts to real-life applications and supporting Sustainable Development Goal 4 on quality education. Findings affirm that the developed instructional materials possess high content validity, are pedagogically aligned with STEM practices, and are ready for classroom field-testing.
Keywords
Physics Education, STEM Teaching Kit
Downloads
References
1. Holubova, R. (2024). Does generation Z (and Alpha) need physics as a separate school subject? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2715(1), Article 012003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2715/1/012003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Yu, H. (2010). On the disciplinary positioning and development direction of physics curriculum and teaching theory. Curriculum, Teaching Materials and Teaching Methods, (9). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. United Nations. (2021a). The 17 Goals. Department of Economic and Social Affairs – Sustainable Development Goals. https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. UNESCO. (2024, February 17). Revitalizing STEM education to equip next generations with STEM competency. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/revitalizing-stem-education-equip-next-generations-stem-competency [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. India STEM Foundation. (2024, March 7). STEM Education in Building a Sustainable Future. https://indiastemfoundation.org/blog/stem-education-sustainable-future/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Listianingrum, S. A., Kuswanto, H., Mundilarto, M., & Dwandaru, W. S. B. (2024). A review of various misconceptions in physics learning. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2622(1), 020028. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0133832 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Haagen-Schützenhöfer, C. (2017). Students’ conceptions on white light and implications for teaching and learning about colour. Physics Education, 52(4). https://iopscience.iop.org/journal/0031-9120/page/Focus-on-Misconceptions [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Damayanti. A study of student’s misconception on light material and how to reduce it using LKS-assisted PBL at Islamic Junior High School (SMP IT) Bina Amal Semarang. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/pc/article/view/14392 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Yennita, Y., Zulirfan, Z., Hermita, N., & Hakim, L. (2022). Validation and Testing of STEM Project-Based Virtual Learning Modules to Improve Higher-Level Thinking Skills. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 7(2). https://journal.stkipsingkawang.ac.id/index.php/JIPF/article/view/2420 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Global Goals. Goal 4: Quality education. https://www.globalgoals.org/goals/4-quality-education/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. UNICEF DATA. SDG Goal 4: Quality Education. https://data.unicef.org/sdgs/goal-4-quality-education/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Tural, G. (2015). Cross-grade comparison of students’ conceptual understanding with lenses in geometric optics. Science Education International, 26(3), 325–343. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1074872.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Guarin, R. M., Buan, A. T., Malicoban, E., Barquilla, M. B., & Yuenyong, C. (2019). Formulating refreshment drink activity utilizing STEM education for Grade 8 learners. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1340(1), Article 012078. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1340/1/012078 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Juško, M., Kikas, O., & Rannikmäe, M. (2024). Effect of an inquiry-based teaching sequence on secondary school students' understanding of wave optics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 20(1), 010156. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.20.010156 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2005). Understanding student differences. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 57-72. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00829.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Adams, R., Boublil, E., & Blair, D. (2023). Einstein-First project: Teaching photons and the dual nature of light in schools. Journal of Physics Education, 58(2), 145–160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Boublil, S., & Blair, D. (2023). Model experiments and analogies for teaching Einsteinian energy. Physics Education, 58(1), Article 015003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ac96c0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Bybee, R. W. (2015). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Creating teachable moments. NSTA Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Mindalano, J., Guarin, R., Salic-Hairulla, M., Nabua, E., & Magsayo, J. (2023). Unpublished Thesis. Promoting Typhoon Awareness through Contextualized STEM Lesson. Master’s Thesis, CED, MSU-IIT, Iligan City [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Rayment, J., de Souza, P., & de Araújo, R. (2022). Home-based bioscience kits during COVID-19. Journal of Science Education, 56(2), 215–229. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Lima, J., de Souza, A., & de Araújo, R. (2020). Arduino-based experiments in optics education. Physics Education, 55(3), 035001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Albuquerque School of Excellence. (2015). Project-based learning in STEM classrooms. ASE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Ochagavia, M., Salic-Hairulla, M., Guarin, R., & Tecson, C. (2022). Unpublished Thesis. Development of A Web-Based STEM Lesson in Conservation of Kapatagan Watershed From Anthropogenic Activities. Master’s Thesis, CED, MSU-IIT, Iligan City [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Patayon, M., Salic-Hairulla, M., Buan, A., & Guarin, R. (2021). Unpublished Thesis. Development of Contextualized STEM Lesson in Greenhouse Effect and Global Warming for Grade 7 Learners. Master’s Thesis, CED, MSU-IIT, Iligan City [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Mueller, J. (2018). Authentic assessment toolbox. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 23(2), 1–7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Al-Azawei, A., Serenelli, F., & Lundqvist, K. (2016). Universal design for learning (UDL): A content analysis of peer-reviewed journal papers from 2012 to 2015. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(3), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v16i3.19295 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Liu, T. C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study