Digital Campaigning and Grassroots Mobilization in Local Elections: A Systematic Review
Authors
Bachelor of Arts in Political Science, Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences and Communication, Davao Oriental State University, Mati City, 8200 Davao Oriental, Philippines (Philippines)
Bachelor of Arts in Political Science, Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences and Communication, Davao Oriental State University, Mati City, 8200 Davao Oriental, Philippines (Philippines)
Bachelor of Arts in Political Science, Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences and Communication, Davao Oriental State University, Mati City, 8200 Davao Oriental, Philippines (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100800691
Subject Category: Social science
Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 10238-10253
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-08-28
Accepted: 2026-09-02
Published: 2026-09-16
Abstract
Local elections are key components of democratic representation. They frequently receive less attention by candidates and lower voter turnout than elections at the national level. This systematic literature review collected studies on the impact of social media-based digital campaign activities by candidates in local or subnational elections on voter turnout and other measures of electoral participation. Studies published between 2012 and 2024 were selected for inclusion in this review. An auditable corpus of 857 article rows was created from an article-numbering frame of 860 records. Of these, 42 potentially eligible studies were re-screened using a set of protocol-based eligibility criteria, and 24 studies in the end were included in the synthesis. The Population, Intervention/Exposure, Comparison/Context, and Outcome (PICECO) framework was extended by the study design to guide the screening process for eligibility. Quality appraisal of the included studies employed a set of CASP-based tools as well as the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool 2018. The evidence base for this review comprised studies from Europe, North America, Australia, Africa, Asia, the Middle East, and South America. Of the 24 included studies, eight were rated as high quality, 15 as of moderate quality, and one as of low quality. Findings from the studies suggested that social media supported local electoral participation but not automatically. Rather, the influence of social media-based campaign activities on voter turnout was conditional. The strongest evidence for increased voter turnout was found for studies that employed peer-to-peer outreach and/or social-pressure strategies via social ties. Validated turnout records and/or studies that employed structured mobilization designs constituted additional elements of strong evidence. In contrast, findings from studies on candidate pages, paid online advertising by candidates, official voter information provided by governments, and general online information exposed to voters via digital campaign activities were more mixed. Social media is most effective as enabling infrastructure for grassroots mobilization when it provides locally relevant information, activates social networks, and makes a connection between online campaign activities and offline voter participation.
Keywords
voter turnout; peer-to-peer outreach; social pressure; civic engagement; online-to-offline participation.
Downloads
References
1. Adnan, I. Z., Kurniawan, A. W., Raturahmi, L., and Latifah, H. (2020). Local elections in the social media era: Socialization of local election through social media for beginner voters by Garut Regency Election Commission in 2018 regional election. KnE Social Sciences, 113-121. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v4i4.6474 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Arfan, R., Suryanef, and Rafni, A. (2023). The role of social-media in increasing millennial political participation in the Medan Johor Subdistrict. JED, 8(1), 124-136. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Barros, A. T. de. (2018). Juventude e poder politico local: A percepcao e o discurso de jovens sobre as eleicoes municipais de 2016 [Youth and local political power: The perception and discourse of young people about the 2016 municipal elections]. Revista Sociedade e Estado, 33(3), 849-887. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-6992201833030009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bond, R. M., Fariss, C. J., Jones, J. J., Kramer, A. D., Marlow, C., Settle, J. E., and Fowler, J. H. (2012). A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature, 489(7415), 295-298. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11421 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Cormack, L. (2019). Leveraging peer-to-peer connections to increase voter participation in local elections. Politics & Policy, 47(2), 248-266. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12297 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. (2018a). CASP cohort study checklist. CASP UK. https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. (2018b). CASP qualitative research checklist. CASP UK. https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Dauda, S. A., and Shira, D. H. (2023). Facebook use and predictors of political participation among youths: A study of Bauchi, Katagum and Misau local government areas of Bauchi State - Nigeria. International Journal of Intellectual Discourse, 6(4), 35-52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Fauzan, I., and Mubarak, H. (2022). Voter behaviour and the campaign pattern of candidates during pandemics in regional head election in Medan City, North Sumatra. POLITIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 13(2), 305-320. https://doi.org/10.14710/politika.13.2.2022.305-320 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Haenschen, K. (2016). Social pressure on social media: Using Facebook status updates to increase voter turnout. Journal of Communication, 66(4), 542-563. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12236 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Hong, Q. N., Fabregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M.-P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., O'Cathain, A., Rousseau, M.-C., Vedel, I., and Pluye, P. (2018). The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for Information, 34(4), 285-291. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180221 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Ikan, J., Lacaste, K. J., Misa, K. L., and Piano, F. J. (2024). The transformational role of digital marketing in the political campaigns of candidates for local government units. Universitas, 12(2), 13-35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Kligler-Vilenchik, N., de Vries Kedem, M., Maier, D., and Stoltenberg, D. (2021). Mobilization vs. demobilization discourses on social media. Political Communication, 38(5), 561-580. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1820648 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Makola, K. M. (2022). The appropriation of digital platforms for youth political engagement in local government elections: The case of Ivory Park, Johannesburg [Master's thesis, University of Johannesburg]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Marquart, F., Ohme, J., and Moeller, J. (2020). Following politicians on social media: Effects for political information, peer communication, and youth engagement. Media and Communication, 8(2), 197-207. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.2764 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Moekahar, F., Ayuningtyas, F., and Hardianti, F. (2022). Social media political campaign model of local elections in Pelalawan Regency Riau. Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi, 10(2), 242-252. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkk.v10i2.41680 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Neihouser, M., Sandri, G., Von Nostitz, F., and Haute, T. (2022). Political information consumption and electoral turnout during COVID: The case of the 2020 municipal elections. French Politics, 20, 182-209. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41253-022-00173-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Nicolas, J. W. C., and Donguiz, R. G. (2024). From social media engagement to voting decisions: Influence of social media on local election. Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 4(7), 50-58. https://doi.org/10.47760/cognizance.2024.v04i07.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Ohme, J., Marquart, F., and Kristensen, L. M. (2019). School lessons, social media and political events in a get-out-the-vote campaign: Successful drivers of political engagement among youth? Journal of Youth Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2019.1645311 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hrobjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., Stewart, L. A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A. C., Welch, V. A., Whiting, P., and Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., Britten, N., Roen, K., and Duffy, S. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: A product from the ESRC methods programme. Lancaster University. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1018.4643 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Raynauld, V., and Greenberg, J. (2014). Tweet, click, vote: Twitter and the 2010 Ottawa municipal election. Journal of Information Technology & Politics. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2014.935840 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Russo, L., and Huddleston, T. (2021). Fostering the political participation of EU non-national citizens: The case of Brussels. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 17(4), 501-518. https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v17i4.1158 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Sinyonde, B. (2024). South African politics and online electioneering discourses in selected social media sites in Phuthaditjhaba. African Journal of Inter/Multidisciplinary Studies, 6(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.51415/ajims.v6i1.1171 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Sitto-Kaunda, K. (2024). Influencing voter turnout: Analysing the IEC's stakeholder communication strategy in the 2021 local government elections. In M. J. Radebe, K. Sitto-Kaunda, and E. Lubinga (Eds.), Public Sector Communication in the Digital Age (pp. 91-120). UJ Press. https://doi.org/10.36615/9781776489909 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Tidy, R. (2015). The impact of internet tools upon volunteer mobilisation and party membership at a local level: A study of the experiences and perceptions of Liberal Democrat grassroots activists [PhD thesis, University of Exeter]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Ugur-Cinar, M., and Ince, T. (2024). What leads to voting despite intention to abstain?: Emotions, turnout, and negative campaigns in Turkish elections. Review of Middle East Studies, 57, 243-263. https://doi.org/10.1017/rms.2024.5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Widodo, B. E. C., Pahlevi, M. E. T., and Amrurobbi, A. A. (2024). Public engagement in Indonesian local elections 2020 and implication of paid advertisement on Facebook. Revista de Estudios Regionales, 130, 173-200. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Zha, X. (2022). WeChat's role in Australian democracy: A grassroots view. Lowy Institute Analysis. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
- Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
- Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
- The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
- Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar