Digital Capabilities towards Students' Academic Performance

Authors

Wan Nor Haliza Wan Mokhtar

Faculty of Information Science, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Suriana Che Daud

Faculty of Information Science, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Norhayati Hussin

Faculty of Information Science, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100801087

Subject Category: Digital Literacy

Volume/Issue: 10/8 | Page No: 15899-15905

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-09-10

Accepted: 2026-09-15

Published: 2026-09-25

Abstract

The increasing integration of digital technologies into educational settings has significantly impacted students' academic performance. This study examined the influence of digital capabilities towards academic performance of Masters’ students in the School of Information Science, UiTM Puncak Perdana Campus, Selangor, Malaysia. This study employed a quantitative approach and adopted a survey method. The sample size for the study are 138 respondents out of 196 total populations. The data collected were analysed using SPSS. This study also explores the role of digital capabilities in shaping students' learning experiences and academic outcomes.

Keywords

Digital capabilities, students, academic performance, digital solution

Downloads

References

1. Akram, M., & Ali, M. (2022). "The role of mobile learning in enhancing academic performance of rural students: A case study." Educational Technology Research and Development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Anandhalli, G. (2018). Impact of Information Literacy Skill on the Academic Achievement of the Students: A Case Study of Anjuman Degree College, Vijayapura. IMPACT: International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Literature (IMPACT: IJRHAL), 6(3), 1–16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. http://www.impactjournals.us/journals.php?id=11&jtype=2&page=54 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL). (2016). Framework for Information Literacy for higher education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Carini, P. (2016). Information literacy for archives and special collections: Defining outcomes. Portal, 16(1), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2016.0006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chan, C. (2016). Institutional Assessment of Student Information Literacy Ability: A Case Study. Communications in Information Literacy. 10, 50–61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. http://dx.doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2016.10.1.14 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Chen, C., & Zhang, X. (2023). "Digital literacy and its impact on rural student performance in online learning environments." Journal of Educational Technology Systems. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. DaLomba, E. J., Kavanaugh, E., Manbeck, K., O’Neill, S., Soldevilla, K., Watson, M., & McLaughlin, E. (2020). The Use of an Embedded Librarian to Enhance Student Information Literacy Skill: A Pilot Study. Journal of Occupational Therapy Education, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.26681/jote.2020.040204 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Dawson, P. H., Lei Hsieh, M., & Carlin, M. T. (2012). Quantitative/Qualitative Analysis of Assessing Student Information Literacy Skill: The Power of Librarian-Faculty Collaborations. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries (QQML), 1(March), 35–42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Diehm, R. A., & Lupton, M. (2014). Learning information literacy. Information Research, 19(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Foord, K. (2020). ‘Read it, now what? Engaging students with information literacy.’ Higher Education, Skill and Work-Based Learning, 11(2), 545–556. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-06-2020-0128 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hsieh, M. L., Dawson, P. H., Hofmann, M. A., Titus, M. L., & Carlin, M. T. (2014). Four Pedagogical Approaches in Helping Students Learn Information Literacy Skill. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40(3–4), 234–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2014.03.012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Jacobson, T. E., & Mackey, T. P. (2013). Proposing a Metaliteracy Model to Redefine Information Literacy. Communications in Information Literacy7(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Jisc. (2014). The digital learning environment. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. https://digitalstudent.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2014/05/15/new-reports-on-the-digital-learning-environment/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2016). The NMC Horizon Report: 2016 Higher Education Edition. New Media Consortium. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Jones-Jang, S. M., Mortensen, T., & Liu, J. (2021). Does Media Literacy Help Identification of Fake News? Information Literacy Helps, but Other Literacies Don’t. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(2), 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219869406 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Lanning, S., & Mallek, J. (2017). Factors Influencing Information Literacy Competency of College Students. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 43(5), 443–450. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2017.07.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Martin, F., Sunley, R., & Turner, L. (2017). The effectiveness of educational mobile apps for learning in higher education: A systematic review of the literature. Computers & Education, 107, 1-22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. McTighe, J., & Wiggins, G. (2013). The Understanding by Design Guide to Creating High-Quality Units. ASCD. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Mohd Idzwan, M. Salleh, Ahmad Faiz, A. H., Raja Abdullah, R. Y., & Zulkarnain, Y. (2011). Measuring The Effect of Information Literacy on the Undergraduates’ Academic Performance in Higher Education. International Conference on Social Science and Humanity, September, 506–510. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.3390.0804 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy?. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065-1078. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Radolovic, D. (2018). Information literacy as a conceptual outline. 2018 41st International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics, MIPRO 2018 - Proceedings, 494–499. https://doi.org/10.23919/MIPRO.2018.8400094 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Rieh, S. Y., Bradley, D., Brennan-Wydra, E., Culler, T., Hanley, E., & Kalt, M. (2019). Librarian role-playing as a method for assessing student information literacy Skill. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 56(1), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.18 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Rosen, L. D., Carrier, L. M., & Cheever, N. A. (2013). Facebook and texting made me do it: Media-induced task-switching while studying. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1221-1231. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Bloomsbury Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3-10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Singh, P., & Mishra, S. (2021). "Teacher training in rural schools: A key to improving digital education outcomes." Asia Pacific Journal of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Soltani, S., & Nikou, S. (2020). An assessment of academic library services: international and domestic students’ perspectives. Library Management, 41(8–9), 631–653. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-04-2020-0071 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Soni, R., & Reddy, P. (2023). "Impact of online education platforms on rural students' academic performance: A longitudinal study." Computers & Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Taylor, A., & Dalal, H. A. (2017). Gender and information literacy: Evaluation of gender differences in a student survey of information sources. College and Research Libraries, 78(1), 90–113. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.78.1.90 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Tewell, E. (2015). A decade of critical information literacy: A review of the literature. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Communications in Information Literacy, 9(1), 24–43. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2015.9.1.174 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Vuorikari, R., Punie, Y., Carretero, S., & Van den Brande, M. (2016). DigComp 2.0: The digital competence framework for citizens. European Commission. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Wan Mokhtar, W. N. H. ., Hussin, N. ., & Mohd Shahari, S. N. . (2024). Digital Literacy Impact on Students’ Performance. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 14(2), 32-39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. https://doi.org/10.24191/jikm.v14i2.3666 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles