Digital Competence and Chemistry Learning Outcomes: Assessing Their Relationship among Grade 10 Students

Authors

John Ryl B. Silacan

Mindanao State University- Iligan Institute of Technology, Philippines (Philippines)

Edna B. Nabua

Mindanao State University- Iligan Institute of Technology, Philippines (Philippines)

Sarah Mae P. Legasa

Mindanao State University- Iligan Institute of Technology, Philippines (Philippines)

Mark Angelo P. Villena

Mindanao State University- Iligan Institute of Technology, Philippines (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100600888

Subject Category: Chemistry

Volume/Issue: 10/6 | Page No: 12624-12635

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-06-17

Accepted: 2026-06-22

Published: 2026-07-08

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the relationship between Grade 10 students’ content proficiency in chemistry competencies and their technological proficiency at a public school in Dapitan City. Using a descriptive-correlational research design, the inquiry sought to determine whether students’ effective use of digital tools correlated with their understanding of core chemistry concepts. A purposive sample of forty-five (45) Grade 10 students participated in the main investigation after research instruments were validated through pilot testing. Two verified tools were utilized: a Chemistry Questionnaire aligned with the Department of Education’s Most Essential Learning Competencies (MELCs), and a 15-item Technological Proficiency Questionnaire adapted from Garma et al. (2024), which measured skills in software operation, web navigation, and online safety. Ethical standards were strictly observed throughout the study. Formal approval was secured from school authorities, and informed consent was obtained from all participants and their legal guardians. Participation was voluntary, and confidentiality and anonymity of all responses were maintained. Findings revealed that students demonstrated low chemistry content proficiency, with a mean score of 51% categorized as “Novice (Not Mastered)”, while they attained a “Proficient” level of technological competence—particularly in online security practices. A weak positive correlation (r = 0.215) was observed between the two variables; however, this relationship was not statistically significant (p = 0.156), indicating that technological proficiency did not exert a significant influence on chemistry performance. These results suggest that although students possess adequate digital capabilities, such skills alone are insufficient to strengthen achievement in conceptually demanding subjects. The study recommends the integration of targeted instructional strategies—including differentiated teaching and pre-laboratory video materials—to enhance students’ conceptual mastery of chemistry content.

Keywords

chemistry competencies, digital skills, educational technology, Grade 10 students, online security skills, software skills, technological proficiency, web navigation skill.

Downloads

References

1. Abojon , J. A., Derasin, L. C., Canque, M. S., Cordero, L. S., & Trinidad, G. A. (2023). Technological skills of senior high school students in state-run basic education institutions in the Philippines. European Chemical Bulletin, pp. 12510-12518. https://www.scihorizon.com/cdn/pdf/1685357340_a201a0c49032731586c4.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Al-Rawi, A., Hameed, I., & Mahmoud, S. (2021). Assessing conceptual understanding of chemical bonding among secondary students using visual tools. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(2), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09908-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Becker, K., & Park, K. (2011). Effects of integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students’ learning: A preliminary meta-analysis. Journal of STEM Education, 12(5/6), 23–37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bulut, O., & Delen, E. (2011). The relationship between students' exposure to technology and their achievement in science and math. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3), 311–317. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Department of Education [DepEd]. (2016). K to 12 Curriculum Guide: Science (Grades 7–10). Department of Education, Republic of the Philippines. Retrieved from https://www.deped.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Garma, J., Ihalon, E., & Gador, S. (2024). Technological Proficiency of Senior High School Students in the Lens of Digital Education. 26. 41-46. 10.5281/zenodo.13886189. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Liang, Y., Chen, S., Abeysekera, R., O'Sullivan, H., Bray, J., & Keevill-Savage, I. (2024). Examining the adoption of technology-enhanced learning in universities and its effects on student performance, satisfaction, and motivation. Computers and Education Open, 7, 100223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100223 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Muhali, M. A. (2026). Conceptual problem-based learning model: Promising intervention to enhance prospective science teachers’ critical thinking skills. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 13, 102509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102509 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Osorio, R., & Aliazas, J. V. (2022). Integrating Android-Based Applications in Teaching Chemistry for Improved Experiential Learning. International Journal of Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics, (Vol. 2, Issue 4, p. 132). https://doi.org/10.53378/352943 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Purnomo, F. S., Kharisma, S., & Rahmawan, S. (2026). Enhancing chemistry learning outcomes through interactive learning media to support sustainable development goals (SDGs): A systematic literature review. ASEAN Journal for Science Education, 5(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.17509/ajse.v5i1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Trust, T., & Whalen, J. (2020). Should teachers be trained in emergency remote teaching? Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 189–199. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Uçar, M.B., Sahin, E. Science Teachers’ Technology Integration through TPACK-P: Proficiency and Component Interactions. J Sci Educ Technol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-026-10331-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles