Digital Literacy Ability and Blended Learning Course Experience among College Students

Blended Learning (BL) represents a pedagogical strategy that merges conventional in-person teaching within a classroom setting with elements of online learning. This study aimed mainly to assess the significant correlation between digital literacy ability and blended learning course experience among college students enrolled in a local higher education institution (HEI) in Santo Tomas, Davao del Norte. This study employed a quantitative, non-experimental approach using a descriptive-correlational design. The 353 respondents completed two sets of adapted-modified survey questionnaires that were validated by the panel of experts. Mean and pearson r were utilized to determine the significant relationship between digital literacy ability and blended learning course experience among college students. The findings showed an r-value of 0.583 and a p-value of 0.000, showing a positive medium significant relationship between digital literacy ability and blended learning course experience. It was thus recommended that the ability to utilize digital literacy in blended learning course experience be closely monitored and prioritized in order to ensure students receive a quality education and satisfactory learning experiences in this modality.

digital literacy ability, blended learning course experience

1. Afandi, A. N. H., Pristiani, R., Kusumaningrum, S. R., & Dewi, R. S. I. (2024). Digital literacy questionnaire instrument: Based on the integration of elementary school students' characteristics. International Journal of Elementary Education, 8(2), 344–353. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v8i2.76773 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aivaz, K. A., & Teodorescu, D. (2022). College students’ distractions from learning caused by multitasking in online vs. face-to-face classes: A case study at a public university in Romania. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(18), 11188. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811188 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alvarez Jr, A. V. (2020). Learning from the Problems and Challenges in Blended Learning: Basis for Faculty Development and Program Enhancement. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(2), 112-132. https://www.asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/433 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Anduyan, D. B. (2021). Effectiveness of Blended Learning Modules as Correlates of Self-Efficacy of ALS Studemts: Basis for an Action Plan. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research. 2(11), 1043 – 1060. doi: 10.11594/ijmaber.02.11.06 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Apriliana, Dian, Fadillah., Marsofiyati, Marsofiyati. (2024). Penerapan Teknologi Digital Pada Administrasi Perkantoran. Optimal, 4(2):234-241. doi: 10.55606/optimal.v4i2.3547 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Aswegen, E. C., & Pendergast, D. (2023). The impact of interest: an emergent model of interest development in the early years. Early Child Development and Care, 193(13–14), 1335–1349. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2023.2245575 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bach, E. (2022). The impact of digital literacy on the cyber security of digital citizens. Economic and Social Development: Book of Proceedings, 196-204. https://www.zbw.eu/econis-archiv/bitstream/11159/8729/1/1807046117_0.pdf#page=202 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Basar, Z. M., Mansor, A. N., Jamaludin, K. A., & Alias, B. S. (2021). The effectiveness and challenges of online learning for secondary school students–A case study. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(3), 119-129. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i3.14514 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Basri, H. (2024). The Effectiveness of Blended Learning, Digital Literacy Programs, and Teacher Training on Student Outcomes in 2024. Global International Journal, 2(5). https://doi.org/10.59613/global.v2i8.249 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Baticulon, R. E., Sy, J. J., Alberto, N. R. I., Baron, M. B. C., Mabulay, R. E. C., Rizada, L. G. T., ... & Reyes, J. C. B. (2021). Barriers to online learning in the time of COVID-19: A national survey of medical students in the Philippines. Medical science educator, 31, 615-626. doi: 10.1007/s40670-021-01231 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Bejaković, P., & Mrnjavac, Ž. (2020). The importance of digital literacy on the labour market. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 42(4), 921-932. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-07-2019-0274 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Bhagat, K. K. (2020). The impact of blended learning at the Uganda Management Institute. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342916704_The_Impact_of_Blended_Learning_at_the_Uganda_Management_Institute [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Bhandari, P. (2022, November 24). What Is Quantitative Research? | Definition, Uses & Methods. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/quantitative-research/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Bouilheres, F., Le, L. T. V. H., McDonald, S., Nkhoma, C., & Jandug-Montera, L. (2020). Defining student learning experience through blended learning. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 3049–3069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10100-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Brodowicz, M. (2024). Descriptive correlational design in research. Aithor. https://aithor.com/essay-examples/descriptive-correlational-design-in-research [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Buhl-Wiggers, J., Kjærgaard, A., & Munk, K. (2022). A scoping review of experimental evidence on face-to-face components of blended learning in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 48(1), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2022.2123911 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Cajucom, E., Lopez, I., Valdez, J., Villanueva, J., Balonquita, W., & Sonday, J. A. (2022). Readiness in Adopting a Blended Learning Approach in Science: Challenges Encountered and Breakthroughs. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 3(3), 220-237. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.6894382 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Chandler, P. (2023). A Cognitive Load Theory Perspective. Journal of Management Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/10525629231200206 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Dabalos, J. (2021). Making Ends Meet: A Survey on Adapting Flexible Learning amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic of the BSIT Program in Davao del Norte State College. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(3), 4735-4739. https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i3.1896 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. De Leon, J. A., Orillo, J. C., Mayol, A. P., Concepcion, R. S., Vicerra, R. R., Bandala, A., ... & San Juan, J. L. (2023, November). Distance Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Exploratory Data Analysis on a Philippine Public Junior High School. In 2023 IEEE 15th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment, and Management (HNICEM) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HNICEM60674.2023.10589033 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Deschênes, A. A. (2024). Digital literacy, the use of collaborative technologies, and perceived social proximity in a hybrid work environment: Technology as a social binder. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 13, 100351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100351 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Devi, R. A. N. J. I. T. A., Pradhan, S. H. R. I. J. A. N. A., Giri, D. O. M. A., Lepcha, N. A. Z. U. N. G., & Basnet, S. H. A. K. E. E. L. A. (2022). Application of correlational research design in nursing and medical research. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University, Natural Sciences Edition, 65(11), 60-69. DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/YRZ68 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Erwin, K., & Mohammed, S. (2022). Digital literacy skills instruction and increased skills proficiency. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science (IJTES), 6(2), 323-332. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.364 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Graham, C. R., & Halverson, L. R. (2022). Blended learning research and practice. In Handbook of open, distance and digital education (pp. 1-20). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0351-9_68-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Hafida, B. (2025). Digital Media Literacy as a Mechanism for Developing Digital Awareness among University Students in the Virtual Environment-Proposed Framework. مجلة الحكمة للدراسات الفلسفية, 13(1), 144-164.‎ https://asjp.cerist.dz/index.php/en/article/263134 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Hudson, W. (2025, January 9). Higher education faced mounting enrollment and security challenges in 2024. Diverse: Issues In Higher Education. https://www.diverseeducation.com/institutions/article/15711331/higher-education-faced-mounting-enrollment-and-security-challenges-in-2024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Indrajaya, K., Qaribilla, R., & Mayawati, C. I. (2024). Digital learning inequality: The role of socioeconomic status in access to online education resources. International Journal of Social and Human, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.59613/55gdmt96 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Intan, Suci, Kasih, Pertiwi., Martha, Tri, Lestari. (2024). Digital literacy analysis: A case study of Telkom Indonesia in exploring its work environment dynamics. Bricolage, 10(2):231-231. doi: 10.30813/bricolage.v10i2.5321 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Kudlay, V. O. (2019). Formation of digital literacy of the individual in the modern information space. Notes on Ukrainian Linguistics , 2 (26), 160-168. https://doi.org/10.18524/2414-0627.2019.26.181707 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Kurt, G., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2022). Technological pedagogical content knowledge-based blended learning model to enhance computer and information literacy. Education and Information Technologies, 27(1), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10597-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Levinsson, H., Nilsson, A., Mårtensson, K., & Persson, S. D. (2024). Course design as a stronger predictor of student evaluation of quality and student engagement than teacher ratings. Higher Education, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01197-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Li, A., Zhang, S., Feng, Z., & Zhang, Q. (2020). Research on calculation method of mean in sports statistical data with excels. International Journal of Computer and Communication Engineering, 9(3), 141-148. doi: 10.17706/ijcce.2020.9.3.141-148 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Ma, J., & Lee, J. (2022). University student learning in blended course designs. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 905592. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.905592 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Marques, C. G., Mateus, L., & Araújo, I. (2024). Digital transformation in higher education institutions: a case study at Polytechnic University of Tomar. In Digital Transformation in Higher Education Institutions (pp. 41-58). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52296-3_3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers college record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Muhammad, Arif, Budiman, Sucipto. (2024). Digital Literacy and Career Guidance: A Study on University Students in Indonesia. West Science Social and Humanities Studies/West Science Social And Humanities Studies, 2(05):888-898. doi: 10.58812/wsshs.v2i05.938 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Muhria, L., Supriatna, N., & Nurfirdaus, N. (2023). Students' challenges of blended learning model in higher education. Journal Corner of Education, Linguistics, and Literature, 2(3), 223-233. https://doi.org/10.54012/jcell.v2i3.123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Mulhayatiah, D., Purwanti, P., Setya, W., Suhendi, H. Y., Kariadinata, R., & Hartini, S. (2019). The impact of digital learning module in improving students’ problem-solving skills. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 8(1), 11-22. DOI: 10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v8i1.3150 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. National Economic and Development Authority Region XI. (2020). SDC XI calls for support on the implementation of the distance learning delivery modalities in Davao Region. National Economic and Development Authority. https://nro11.neda.gov.ph/sdc-xi-calls-for-support-on-the-implementation-of-the-distance-learning-delivery-modalities-in-davao-region/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Naz, F. L., Raheem, A., Khan, F. U., & Muhammad, W. (2022). An effect of digital literacy on the academic performance of university-level students. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(8), 10720-10732. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=An+Effect+Of+Digital+Literacy+On+The+Academic+Performance+Of+University-Level+Students&btnG= [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Nguyen, T. D., Shih, M., Srivastava, D., Tirthapura, S., & Xu, B. (2020). Stratified random sampling from streaming and stored data. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 39(3), 665–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10619-020-07315-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Nguyen, T. T., Tran, T. N. H., Do, T. H. M., Dinh, T. K. L., Nguyen, T. U. N., & Dang, T. M. K. (2024). Digital literacy, online security behaviors and E-payment intention. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(2), 100292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100292 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Nikou, S., De Reuver, M. and Mahboob Kanafi, M. (2022), "Workplace literacy skills—how information and digital literacy affect adoption of digital technology", Journal of Documentation, Vol. 78 No. 7, pp. 371-391. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-12-2021-0241 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Ouahidi, L. M. (2020). Constraints on developing digital literacy skills in higher education. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation (IJLLT). DOI: 10.32996/ijllt.2020.3.2.22 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Phan, T. C., Van Tran, H., Truong, T. D., Le, H. T., & Phan, D. M. (2024). Developing Information Technology Competence in Online Education with the TPACK Approach. Vietnam Journal of Education, 166-176. https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2024.361 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Prayitno, A. (2023). Technological innovation in public administration transformation: case study of e-government implementation in indonesia. Journal of Governance, 8(4), 387-402. http://dx.doi.org/10.31506/jog.v8i4.23017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Purwanto, A., & Tawar, T. (2024). Investigating The Role of the use of computer Hardware, software and lecturer involvement on online universities student satisfaction. UJoST-Universal Journal of Science and Technology, 3(1), 1-13. http://ujost.org/index.php/journal/article/view/132. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Rianto, A. (2020). Blended Learning Application in Higher Education: EFL Learners' Perceptions, Problems, and Suggestions. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 55-68. https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v5i1.574 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Salmons, J. (2023, February 3). Quantitative research with nonexperimental designs. Sage Research Methods Community. https://researchmethodscommunity.sagepub.com/blog/quantitative-research-with-non-experimental-designs [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Santos, A. P. (2020). In the Philippines, distance learning reveals the digital divide. The Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung European Union. https://us.boell.org/en/2020/10/06/philippines-distance-learning-reveals-digital-divide?fbclid=IwAR3bqylzWvyCuk-VTjfGlInxUGGSWEi6t6FQpmIs0CqisDx9MYW1ZS2QJ-Y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Sari, N., & Wahyudin, D. (2022). The role of support system, digital literacy, and learning strategy on student learning outcomes in blended learning environment. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 237–254. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1427730.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Simkus, J. (2023). Stratified Random Sampling: Definition, Method & Examples. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/stratified-random-sampling.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Snihur, O., Jamshid, A. M., Golubytskyi, S., Hrechko, A., & Prockopets, K. (2024). Using Adobe Creative Cloud to create multimedia content in higher education institutions. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias, 4, 1311. https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf20251311 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Tang, Y., Chen, P., & Law, K. M. Y. (2023). A meta-analysis of effects of blended learning on performance, attitude, and engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1212056. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1212056 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Tong, D. H., Uyen, B. P., & Ngan, L. K. (2022). The effectiveness of blended learning on students' academic achievement, self-study skills and learning attitudes: A quasi-experiment study in teaching the conventions for coordinates in the plane. Heliyon, 8(12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12657 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Weisburd, D., Britt, C., Wilson, D. B., Wooditch, A., Weisburd, D., Britt, C., ... & Wooditch, A. (2020). Measuring Association for Scaled Data: Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient. Basic Statistics in Criminology and Criminal Justice, 479-530. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47967-1_14 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study