Digital Transformation and the Evolution of Management Accounting: A Systematic Literature Review

Digital transformation is fundamentally reshaping management accounting by changing how organizations generate, analyse, and utilize information for strategic decision-making. Despite the growing body of research on artificial intelligence (AI), big data analytics, robotic process automation (RPA), blockchain, cloud computing, and enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, existing knowledge remains fragmented across individual technologies and theoretical perspectives. This study conducts a systematic literature review to synthesize current evidence on the influence of digital transformation on management accounting. Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, peer-reviewed studies published between 2010 and 2025 were systematically identified from five major academic databases. Following screening, eligibility assessment, and quality evaluation, 61 studies were included in the final synthesis. The findings indicate that digital technologies are transforming management accounting from a retrospective reporting function into a predictive, real-time, and strategically oriented decision-support capability. The review further demonstrates that digital transformation is redefining the professional role of management accountants, who are increasingly expected to possess competencies in data analytics, digital technologies, strategic decision-making, communication, and ethical governance. Successful implementation depends not only on technological investment but also on leadership commitment, organizational culture, digital capabilities, and robust data governance. The review also identifies significant research gaps, including limited empirical evidence from developing economies, insufficient integration of theoretical perspectives, and inadequate attention to ethical governance and sustainability issues. By integrating fragmented research across multiple digital technologies, this review provides a comprehensive understanding of the technological, organizational, and professional dimensions of digital transformation in management accounting. The findings offer practical implications for researchers, practitioners, educators, and policymakers while identifying priorities for future research aimed at strengthening digitally enabled management accounting and organizational performance.

Digital transformation, Management accounting, Artificial intelligence, Big data analytics, Robotic process automation, Blockchain, Cloud computing, Enterprise resource planning

1. Al-Omari, A., & Al-Naimi, M. (2023). Cloud-based ERP adoption and its effect on management accounting practices in manufacturing SMEs. Journal of Accounting Innovation, 9(2), 112–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacin.2023.04.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Appelbaum, D., Kogan, A., Vasarhelyi, M. A., & Yan, Z. (2024). The future of data analytics in accounting: Integrating artificial intelligence and human judgment. Journal of Information Systems, 38(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-2024-001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Becker, A., & Mahlendorf, M. D. (2023). Digital transformation in management control: A framework for integrating analytics and performance management. Management Accounting Research, 61, 100831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2023.100831 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bhimani, A., & Willcocks, L. (2023). Reframing management accountants in the age of digital transformation. Management Accounting Research, 63, 100839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2023.100839 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bostrom, R. P., & Heinen, J. S. (1977). MIS problems and failures: A socio-technical perspective. MIS Quarterly, 1(3), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/249019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA). (2023). Future-ready finance: The changing role of management accountants in digital business. London: CIMA Global. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Fang, W., Zhang, L., & Liu, R. (2024). Digital transformation and the quality of accounting information systems: Evidence from emerging markets. Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance, 18(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAG-02-2024-0011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Institute of Management Accountants (IMA). (2024). Artificial intelligence and the management accountant: Opportunities and competencies. Montvale, NJ: IMA Research Foundation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kitchenham Barbara (2004). Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele University Technical Report TR/SE-0401. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kowal, J., & Dudycz, T. (2024). Accounting 4.0: The digital evolution of management control systems. Journal of Management Control, 35(2), 145–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-024-00312-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kraus, S., Durst, S., Ferreira, J. J., Veiga, P. M., & Kailer, N. (2023). Digital transformation and management accounting research: A review and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 159, 113084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113084 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Lee, K., Kim, J., & Park, S. (2024). Integrating AI analytics into management control: Evidence from Korean firms. Accounting Horizons, 38(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-2024-001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Miller, P., & Becker, H. (2023). Ethics and accountability in algorithmic accounting systems. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 97, 102555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2023.102555 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. MIT Sloan Management Review. (2025). Generative AI and the future of corporate reporting. MIT Sloan Management Review, 66(3), 45–57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Moll, J., & Yigitbasioglu, O. M. (2022). The role of digital technologies in management accounting: A review and research agenda. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 101, 101328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2022.101328 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Motta, V., Pereira, C., & Oliveira, A. (2025). Artificial intelligence applications in management accounting: A systematic literature review. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 21(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-11-2024-0176 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Munir, R., Collins, D., & Hussein, A. (2023). Big data analytics capability and decision quality in management accounting. Accounting Forum, 47(4), 345–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/01559982.2023.2231547 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ocansey, E. O. N. D. (2021). The Adoption of computer assisted techniques (CAAT): Knowledge and attitudes of auditors from the big four auditing firms in Ghana. Journal of Business, Governance and information Technology, 3(1), 107-118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Ozili, P. K. (2024). Artificial intelligence in accounting: Opportunities, challenges, and implications. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 63, 100663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2024.100663 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … Moher, D. (2021). PRISMA 2020: An updated guideline for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Putra, Y. A., Santoso, E., & Rohman, A. (2024). Digital transformation and management accounting effectiveness: Evidence from Indonesian manufacturing firms. Asian Review of Accounting, 32(2), 278–299. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-10-2023-0262 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Quattrone, P. (2023). Digital accounting and governance: Reconsidering accountability in algorithmic organizations. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 36(4), 1021–1043. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2023-5819 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Richins, G., Stapleton, A., Stratopoulos, T. C., & Wong, C. (2023). Big data analytics capabilities and management accounting: Evidence from global firms. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 50, 100695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2023.100695 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Rosmala, D. (2024). Digital transformation and organizational performance: The mediating role of management accounting practices. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 73(5), 1023–1045. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-06-2023-0381 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Sutton, S. G., Holt, M., & Arnold, V. (2023). Trust and ethics in AI-based accounting systems: Implications for assurance and governance. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 20(2), 133–155. https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta-2023-020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. The Unaccounted Effects of Digital Transformation. (2025). Exploring hidden risks and accountability gaps in AI-driven accounting. Journal of Accounting Ethics & Technology, 10(1), 15–34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Thomas James & Harden Angela (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Tiron-Tudor, A., & Deliu, D. (2024). Digital competencies and the redefinition of the management accountant’s role: Evidence from European firms. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 15(1), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-09-2023-0568 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Tranfield David, Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Trist, E., & Bamforth, K. (1951). Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal-getting. Human Relations, 4(1), 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675100400101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Wang, L., He, J., & Zhao, M. (2024). Blockchain applications in inter-organizational management control and performance reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 37(6), 1542–1565. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-05-2023-6258 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
• Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
• A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
• The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
• Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria