Digitalisation of Court Processes in Nigeria: An Appraisal of National Industrial Court of Nigeria

Authors

Musa Alkali Lawan Ph.D

Senior Lecturer, Department of Public Law, Faculty of Law, University of Maiduguri, Borno State, Nigeria. (Nigeria)

Abdullah Usman, LL.M

Lecturer, Mohammed Goni College of Legal, Islamic and Educational Studies, Maiduguri, Borno State, Nigeria (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.101000251

Subject Category: Labour and Industrial Law

Volume/Issue: 10/10 | Page No: 3374-3385

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-10-14

Accepted: 2026-10-19

Published: 2026-11-01

Abstract

The digitalisation of court processes has become important component of contemporary justice administration, particularly in addressing delays, reducing the cost of litigation and improving access to justice. In Nigeria, the National Industrial Court of Nigeria (NICN), as a specialised court with exclusive jurisdiction over labour, employment and industrial relations matters, has increasingly embraced digital technologies in the management and determination of cases. The article examines the digitalisation of court processes in Nigeria with particular emphasis on the NICN. It conceptually clarifies digitalisation of court processes, electronic filing, court processes and access to justice, and traces the historical development of the NICN. The article further examines the legal framework governing digitalisation at the NICN, particularly the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended), the NICN Act 2006 and NICN Civil Procedure Rules 2017. It assesses the prospects of digitalisation in promoting speedy administration of justice, reducing the cost of litigation, facilitating the admission and management of electronic evidence, and enabling effective digital tracking of case progress, among other benefits. However, the article identifies significant challenges, which include legal and regulatory uncertainties, technical failures during virtual proceedings, difficulties associated with electronic service of court processes, inadequate digital literacy among lawyers and judges, insufficient information and communication technology (ICT) infrastructure across NICN divisions, cyber security and confidentiality concerns, cost of digital litigation, and limited digital access for employees and trade unions. The article adopts doctrinal research methodology based principally on relevant legislation, judicial decisions, procedural rules and other digital materials. It argues that although digitalisation has considerable potential to enhance the efficiency, transparency and accessibility of the administration of justice at the NICN, its effectiveness depends upon an adequate legal framework, reliable technological infrastructure, continuous capacity building, cybersecurity safeguards and inclusive access to digital justice. The article therefore recommends, among other measures, the development and periodic review of a comprehensive legal and regulatory framework for digital court processes, the establishment of a technical contingency protocol for virtual proceedings, and the adoption of clear and uniform procedures for electronic service of court processes applicable across all divisions of the NICN.

Keywords

Digitalisation, Court Processes, Electronic Filing, National Industrial Court of Nigeria, Access to Justice, Electronic Evidence, virtual Proceedings, Prospects, Challenges.

Downloads

References

1. European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ), Guidelines on Electronic Court Filing (E-Filing) and Digitalisation of Courts (CEPEJ 2021) 15, 9 December 2021. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ibid. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended by Third Alteration Act, 2010) ss. 254A and 254F. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. National Industrial Court Act, 2006, ss. 1 and 12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Uchenna C. Okeke., Enhancing Access to Justice through Technology in Developing Countries: Technology Based Initiatives, Challenges and Emerging Technologies, (2025) (16) (3) International Journal for Court Administration, [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Fedelis Nwadialo, Civil Procedure in Nigeria (2nd edn, University of Lagos Press 2000) 215-223. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ibid. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Scribd, Electronic Filing in Nigerian Courts, <httpswww.scribd.com> accessed on 17/09/2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. National Industrial Court of Nigeria, (Civil Procedure) Rules 2017, Order 6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ibid. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ibid. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Titus Dio Lukas, Digital Justice and Civil Procedure Reform in Nigeria: A Critical Analysis of Electronic Filing and Service under the Taraba State High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 2026, (2026) (1) (4) British Journal of Contemporary Research, 4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Jason Brovitch, What is Electronic Evidence, <https://www.icrimefighter.com> accessed on 13/10/2026. See also Section 84 of the Nigeria Evidence Act, 2011. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ibid. s. 84 Evidence Act, 2011. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Okene, O.V.C. Nigerian Labour Law: The Law of Work (Lagos: Concept Publications Ltd, 2011) 486. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Trade Disputes Act 1976, No. 7 of 1976 (now Cap T8, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004); Uvieghara, E.E. Labour Law in Nigeria (Lagos: Melthouse Press Ltd, 2001) 459. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. NICN, ss 1-7 of the 2006 Act; see Oloruntoba-Oju v. Dopamu. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Offornze, D.A. and Paul. U.A, The National Industrial Court of Nigeria, Law, Practice and Procedure (TOP Design, 2013) 61; Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, (as altered by the Third Alteration Act, 2010) ss. 6(5) (cc), 254A-254F, 254C (1) (f) and (h). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Okene, O.V.C. (n 3) 495. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended by Third Alteration Act, 2010) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. O. D. Amucheazi and P. U. Abba, The National Industrial Court of Nigeria, Law, Practice and Procedure, (Published by Top Design, 2013), 55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Ibid. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. National Industrial Court Act, 2006, ss 1 and 12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. National Industrial Court of Nigeria Act, 2006, s 48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Order 6A Rule 1 (2) NICN Rules, 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Ibid. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Ibid. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. D. T. A. Eyongndi and K.O. Nnana Onu, Legal Diagnosis of the National Industrial Court of Nigeria Rules, 2017 As A Catalyst of Egalitarian Labour Adjudication, (2021) (13) Jumma University Journal of Law (JUJL), 55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Ibid. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Ibid. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Ibid. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Law Teacher, fast Track Courts, <https://www.lawteacher.net> accessed on 30/09/2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Ibid [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Ibid. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Unini Chioma, E-Courts and Digital Justice: The Future of the Nigerian Judiciary, <https://thenigerialawyer.com> accessed on 30/09/2026. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles