Digitalization and Rural Entrepreneurship: A Review of Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions
Authors
Faculty Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Kedah Sungai Petani (Malaysia)
Faculty Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Kedah Sungai Petani (Malaysia)
Faculty Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Kedah Sungai Petani (Malaysia)
Faculty Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Kedah Sungai Petani (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100300514
Subject Category: Management
Volume/Issue: 10/3 | Page No: 7039-7049
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-03-15
Accepted: 2026-03-21
Published: 2026-04-15
Abstract
Rural entrepreneurship is increasingly recognized as a critical driver of local economic development, yet its progress remains constrained by structural barriers such as limited infrastructure, inadequate access to markets, and low levels of digital literacy. The rapid advancement of digital technologies has created unprecedented opportunities to address these challenges, but fragmented evidence and diverse contexts complicate a coherent understanding of how digitalization shapes rural entrepreneurial ecosystems. This review aims to analyze the current state of research on digitalization and rural entrepreneurship by consolidating existing literature, developing a concept map, identifying topic experts, and examining emerging themes. Using Scopus AI (25 September 2025), a structured search string was applied. The retrieved results were analyzed through the Summary, Expanded Summary, Concept Map, Topic Experts, and Emerging Themes features. Findings highlight consistent themes such as digital entrepreneurship for rural revitalization and agribusiness transformation, as well as rising themes including rural digital economies, women’s empowerment, and rural innovation. These results demonstrate both opportunities and challenges: digital tools enhance competitiveness, resource management, and inclusion, but adoption is hindered by uneven infrastructure, technical knowledge gaps, and socio-cultural barriers. The study contributes theoretically by linking digitalization with inclusive development and practically by offering insights for policymakers to strengthen infrastructure, literacy, and tailored support programs. Future research should deepen comparative analyses across diverse rural contexts and evaluate the long-term sustainability of digital interventions.
Keywords
Digitalization, Rural Entrepreneurship, Digital Transformation, Sustainable Development, Women’s Empowerment
Downloads
References
1. Alka, T. A., Sreenivasan, A., & Suresh, M. (2024). Rural women’s entrepreneurship in the digital age. In Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (Vol. 908, pp. 421–431). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0210-7_34 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Fahmi, F. Z., & Savira, M. (2023). Digitalization and rural entrepreneurial attitude in Indonesia: A capability approach. Journal of Enterprising Communities, 17(2), 454–478. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-06-2021-0082 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Gómez-Carmona, O., Buján-Carballal, D., Casado-Mansilla, D., López-de-Ipiña, D., Cano-Benito, J., Cimmino, A., Poveda-Villalón, M., García-Castro, R., Almela-Miralles, J., Apostolidis, D., Drosou, A., Tzovaras, D., Wagner, M., Guadalupe-Rodriguez, M., Salinas, D., Esteller, D., Riera-Rovira, M., González, A., Clavijo-Ágreda, J., … Bujalkova, N. (2023). Mind the gap: The AURORAL ecosystem for the digital transformation of smart communities and rural areas. Technology in Society, 74, 102304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102304 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Gupta, M., Rungta, D., Awasthi, Y., & Singh, S. (2025). Opportunities for women's rural entrepreneurship in deprived rural environments: Empowering the pathway for women entrepreneurs in rural environments. In Entrepreneurial Opportunities in Disadvantaged Rural Communities (pp. 355–391). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-0214-0.ch012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Iliopoulos, C., Theodorakopoulou, I., Giotis, T., & Brunori, G. (2025). Perceptions of costs and benefits of farm digitalization in Europe. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 28(3), 543–564. https://doi.org/10.22434/ifamr.1274 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Korsgaard, S., & Müller, S. (2015). Rural entrepreneurship or entrepreneurship in the rural – Between place and space. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 21(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-11-2013-0205 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Li, J., Wang, H., & Soh, W. (2024). Digital transformation, financial literacy and rural household entrepreneurship. Finance Research Letters, 62, 105171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105171 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Lokuge, S. (2020). Theoretical opportunities for rural innovation and entrepreneurship research. In Rural entrepreneurship and innovation in the digital era (pp. 270–287). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4942-1.ch015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Lokuge, S., & Sedera, D. (2020). Rural entrepreneurship and innovation in the digital era. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4942-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Lokuge, S., Sedera, D., Grover, V., & Xu, D. (2019). Organizational readiness for digital innovation: Development and empirical calibration of a construct. Information and Management, 56(3), 445–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.09.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Lokuge, S., Sedera, D., Ahuja, S., Kathuria, A., & Agyapong, D. (2025). A global perspective of rural innovation and entrepreneurship in the digital era: A panel report. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 56, 1191–1224. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.05644 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Nambisan, S. (2017). Digital entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 41(6), 1029–1055. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12254 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Räisänen, J., & Tuovinen, T. (2021). Adoption of digital innovations in rural enterprises during COVID-19. In The rural enterprise economy (pp. 53–71). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003034001-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Reyes Ayala, L., Morales Sáenz, F. I., & Silva Lavín, A. H. (2025). Digital empowerment in the countryside: Technological experiences of rural women entrepreneurs [Empoderamiento digital en el campo: Experiencias tecnológicas de mujeres emprendedoras rurales]. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 31(11), 112–124. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Risdalen, K. W., Solberg, M. M., Khan, N. J., & Duc, A. N. (2023). Sustainable digital transformation for rural business: A case study of a Norwegian startup. In Proceedings - 2023 International Conference on ICT for Sustainability (ICT4S 2023) (pp. 197–206). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICT4S58814.2023.00028 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Salemink, K., Strijker, D., & Bosworth, G. (2017). Rural development in the digital age: A systematic literature review on unequal ICT availability, adoption, and use in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 360–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Samsudin, N., Zakaria, T., Osman, J., Ramdan, M. R., Khalid, I. K. M., Mohamad, N., Hanafi, H. F., & Sastraredja, S. (2024). The digitalization technology for sustainable rural entrepreneurship: A structured review. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 42(1), 14–30. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.42.1.1430 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Taneja, S., & Dahiya, K. (2024). Digital transformation: Catalyzing rural entrepreneurship in the 21st century. In Utilizing AI and smart technology to improve sustainability in entrepreneurship (pp. 88–103). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-1842-3.ch006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Tiwasing, P., Clark, B., & Gkartzios, M. (2022). How can rural businesses thrive in the digital economy? A UK perspective. Heliyon, 8(10), e10745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10745 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Xie, G., Huang, L., Bin, H., Apostolidis, C., Jiang, Y., Li, G., & Cai, W. (2022). Sustainable entrepreneurship in rural e-commerce: Identifying entrepreneurs in practitioners by using deep neural networks approach. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 840479. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.840479 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Xie, Y., & Chen, T. (2025). A study on the impact of digital financial literacy on household entrepreneurship—Evidence from China. Sustainability, 17(1), 117. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17010117 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Yadav, H., Paliwal, M., & Chatradhi, N. (2022). Entrepreneurship development of rural women through digital inclusion: Examining the contributions of public programs. In Palgrave studies in democracy, innovation and entrepreneurship for growth (pp. 287–309). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12217-0_14 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Zhou, Y., Cai, Z., & Wang, J. (2023). Digital rural construction and rural household entrepreneurship: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 15(19), 14219. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914219 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
- Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
- A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
- The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
- Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria