Discourse Markers as a Core Component of Stylistic Competence in Arabic L2 Writing: A Functional Perspective

This study examines discourse markers as a core component of stylistic competence in Arabic L2 writing from a functional perspective. It addresses a persistent gap in which learners demonstrate grammatical accuracy but produce texts lacking coherence and rhetorical organisation. Adopting a qualitative conceptual-analytical approach, the study synthesises insights from Arabic rhetorical tradition and functional linguistics to model discourse markers as a system of cohesive devices that regulate inter-sentential relations. The analysis shows that weaknesses in learner writing are primarily discourse-functional, reflected in fragmented structure, under-specified semantic relations, over-reliance on a limited set of markers, and first language transfer. The study further establishes a functional classification of discourse markers into major categories, demonstrating that they operate as an integrated system governing textual organisation, with inferential, causal, and adversative markers carrying greater functional load in academic discourse. The findings position discourse markers as central to coherence and argument development, and argue for a shift toward discourse-oriented pedagogy that emphasises their contextual and functional deployment.

Arabic L2 Writing, Stylistic Competence, Discourse Markers

1. ʿAbd al-Salām, A. Sh. (1994). Durūs fī al-taḥlīl al-taqābulī wa-taḥlīl al-akhtāʾ (ghayr manshūr) [Lessons in contrastive analysis and error analysis (unpublished)]. Department of Arabic Language and Literature, Kulliyyah of Islamic Revealed Knowledge and Human Sciences, International Islamic University Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abd Rahman, L., & Abdullah, N. (2011). Al-ittiṣāq al-naṣṣī wa-ahammiyyatuhu fī tadrīs al-lughah al-ʿArabiyyah li-ghayr al-nāṭiqīn bihā: Dirāsah fī al-ʿibārāt al-rābiṭah [Textual cohesion and its importance in teaching Arabic to non-native speakers: A study of connecting phrases]. In M. Ahmad et al. (Eds.), Prosiding Seminar Antarabangsa Pengajaran Bahasa Arab 2011 (SAPBA’11): Wawasan dan cabaran Malaysia–China (pp. 564–574). Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al-Ashqar, M. S. ʿA. (1995). Muʿjam ʿulūm al-lughah al-ʿArabiyyah (ʿan al-ʾanāmin) [Dictionary of Arabic linguistic sciences]. Muʾassasat al-Risālah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Al-Fārisī, I. A. (2001). Al-lughah al-ʿArabiyyah li-al-aghrāḍ al-akādīmiyyah: Mabādiʾ wa-uṣūl al-kitābah al-ibdāʿiyyah wa-al-baḥth al-ʿilmī bi-al-lughah al-ʿArabiyyah [Arabic for academic purposes: Principles of creative writing and scientific research in Arabic]. Dār al-Tajdīd lil-Ṭibāʿah wa-al-Nashr wa-al-Tarjamah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Al-Khūlī, M. ʿA. (2001). Al-mahārāt al-dirāsiyyah [Study skills]. Dār al-Falāḥ for Publishing and Distribution. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Al-Naḥḥās, M. (1986). Dirāsāt fī al-adawāt al-naḥwiyyah (2nd ed.) [Studies in grammatical tools]. Al-Rabīʿān Publishing and Distribution. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Alqasham, F. H., Al-Ahdal, A. A. M. H., & Babekir, A. H. S. (2021). Coherence and cohesion in Saudi EFL learners’ essay writing: A study at a tertiary-level institution. Asian EFL Journal, 28(1.1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Al-Shanaṭī, M. Ṣ. (2001). Fann al-taḥrīr al-ʿArabī: Ḍawābiṭuhu wa-anmāṭuhu (5th ed.) [The art of Arabic writing: Its principles and patterns]. Dār al-Andalus for Publishing and Distribution. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Al-Ṣubayḥī, M. A. (2008). Madkhal ilā ʿilm al-naṣṣ [An introduction to text linguistics]. Al-Dār al-ʿArabiyyah lil-ʿUlūm Nāshirūn. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Faḍl, Ṣ. (1992). Balāghat al-khiṭāb wa-ʿilm al-naṣṣ [Rhetoric of discourse and text linguistics]. National Council for Culture, Arts and Letters. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Gao, Y. (2023). Analyse the function of discourse markers using in naturally occurring discourses and planned speeches. SHS Web of Conferences, 179, 01027. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1983). Cohesion in English. Longman Group Limited. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hassan, H. (1999). Wasāʾil al-rabṭ fī al-tarākīb al-ʿArabiyyah: Dirāsah naḥwiyyah dalāliyyah [Cohesive devices in Arabic structures: A syntactic-semantic study] (Unpublished master’s thesis). International Islamic University Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ḥassān, T. (n.d.). Al-lughah al-ʿArabiyyah: Maʿnāhā wa-mabnāhā. Dār al-Bayḍāʾ. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ḥassanein, A. Ṭ & Al Warraki, N. N.. (1997). Adawāt al-rabṭ fī al-ʿArabiyyah al-muʿāṣirah (2nd ed.) [The Connecters in Modern Standard Arabic]. American University in Cairo Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ibn Khaldūn, ʿA. R. (2004). Muqaddimat Ibn Khaldūn (Ḥ. A. al-Ṭāhir, Ed.). Dār al-Fajr lil-Turāth. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Khaṭṭābī, M. (1991). Lisāniyyāt al-naṣṣ: Madkhal ilā insijām al-khiṭāb (1st ed.) [Text linguistics: An introduction to discourse coherence]. Al-Markaz al-Thaqāfī al-ʿArabī. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Md Din, A. G., & Zabidin, M. A. R. (2018). Ḍawābiṭ wa-qawāʿid fī al-kitābah al-ʿArabiyyah [Guidelines and rules in Arabic writing]. Ghazisya Enterprise. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Mohd Yusof, M. I. bin, & Nordin, M. binti. (2025). Fungsi penanda wacana bahasa Arab dan kekerapan penggunaannya dalam skrip roleplay. Buletin ACIS, (81), 14–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Mohd Yusuf, H. D. (2005). Al-ʿibārāt al-rābiṭah fī al-lughatayn al-ʿArabiyyah wa-al-Malāyūwiyyah: Dirāsah taqābuliyyah [Linking phrases in Arabic and Malay: A contrastive study] (Unpublished master’s thesis). International Islamic University Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Rusli, M. Ḥ. (2008). Taḥlīl al-akhtāʾ al-uslūbiyyah fī al-taʿbīr al-taḥrīrī al-ʿArabī ladā ṭullāb al-shahādah al-thānawiyyah al-Mālīziyyah [Analysis of stylistic errors in Arabic written expression among Malaysian secondary school students] (Unpublished master’s thesis). International Islamic University Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Sāmī, W. (1999). Al-kitābah wa-al-uslūb [Writing and style]. Qism al-Nashr bi-al-Jāmiʿah al-Amrīkiyyah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Swales, J. M. 2010. Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. van Dijk, T. A. (2000). Al-naṣṣ wa-al-siyāq: Istiqṣāʾ al-baḥth fī al-khiṭāb al-dilālī wa-al-tadāwulī (A. Qanīnī, Trans.) [Text and context: Explorations in semantic and pragmatic discourse]. Africa al-Sharq. (Original work published in 1977) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Zabidin, M. A. R. (2011). Al-adawāt al-rābiṭah fī al-muqarrar al-ʿArabī fī al-madāris al-thānawiyyah al-Māliziyyah: Dirāsah waṣfiyyah wa-taḥlīliyyah [Cohesive devices in the Arabic curriculum in Malaysian secondary schools: A descriptive and analytical study] (Unpublished master’s thesis). International Islamic University Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Zabidin, M. A.R., Ahmed Awad, R. I., Alawadi, E. M. S., & Mahdi, R. (2021). Talāzumiyyat al-rabṭ fī al-kitābah al-inshāʾiyyah bayna al-uṣūl wa-al-tawẓīf wa-al-mahārah: Dirāsah fī mahārat al-kitābah li-ghayr al-nāṭiqīn bi-al-ʿArabiyyah [Cohesive linkage in essay writing between principles, application, and skill: A study in writing skill for non-native Arabic speakers]. Arabiyatuna: Jurnal Bahasa Arab, 5(2), 173–196. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Zulkifli, N. D. A., & Mohd Yusoff, N. M. R. (2025). Analisis penanda wacana bahasa Arab di dalam silibus KBD: Buku teks Usuluddin tingkatan tiga [Analysis of Arabic discourse markers in KBD syllabus Usuluddin textbook Form 3]. International Journal of Advanced Research in Islamic Studies and Education (ARISE), 5(1), 162–170. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Evaluating the Impacts of Mind Mapping Strategy on Developing EFL Students’ Critical Reading Skills
• Significance of Reading Instructions for Language Improvement in Children with Down Syndrome
• Prenasalised Consonants in Liangmai
• Metadiscourse Matters: Definitions, Models, and Advantages for ESL/ EFL Writing
• Blank Minds and Stuck Voices: Understanding and Addressing Cognitive Anxiety in High-Stakes ESL Speaking Tests