Discussion on Psychological Factors Supporting Online Learning
Authors
Leshan Vocational and Technical College, Le Shan; University of Technology Malaysia Johor Bahru (China, Malaysia)
University of Technology Malaysia, Johor Bahru (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100441
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 9/11 | Page No: 5659-5665
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-11-13
Accepted: 2025-12-21
Published: 2025-12-16
Abstract
At present, some scholars have conducted research on online learning from a psychological perspective. Based on this, from the aspects of learners' meta-cognitive ability, learners' original knowledge base, learners' motivation, learners' learning styles, etc., the psychological factors required for online learning in the adult-oriented modern distance education environment are discussed and analyzed, aiming to provide reference opinions for adult learners to better conduct online learning and for online course designers to design a better online teaching environment.
Keywords
Modern distance education; online learning
Downloads
References
1. Nie Ruihua. Internet and Distance Education [M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Wang Lu, Feng Hong. Five Factors Affecting Learning Quality in Distance Learning Systems [J]. Journal of Educational Technology, 2000(7). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Wang Ling, Fang Ping, Guo Dejun. The Nature, Structure and Evaluation Methods of Metacognition [J]. Psychological Dynamics, 1999(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Wang Yan. A New Conception of Learner Characteristic Analysis in Online Teaching Environment [J]. Journal of Yangzhou University (Higher Education Research Edition), 2005(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Liu Rude, Jiang Tao. The Influence of Learner Characteristics on Online Learning [J]. China Educational Technology, 2004(6). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Yan Guocai. Learning Psychology [M]. Beijing: Police Education Press, 1998. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 16, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Jansen, R. S., van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., & Kester, L. (2020). Self-regulated learning partially mediates the effect of self-regulated learning interventions on achievement in higher education: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 31, 100341. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Zheng, L., Li, X., & Huang, R. (2020). The influence of self-regulated learning on learning effectiveness in MOOC: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 153, 103902. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Wang, C., & Chen, T. (2021). Effects of learning styles on learners’ behavioral patterns in online discussion forums: A lag sequential analysis. Computers & Education, 172, 104251. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Xie, K., Hensley, L. C., Law, V., & Sun, Z. (2019). Self-regulation as a function of perceived leadership and cohesion in small group online collaborative learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 456–468. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Garrison, D. R. (2017).E-learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework for research and practice(3rd ed.).Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies and academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 16, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Jansen, R. S., van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., & Kester, L. (2020). Self-regulated learning partially mediates the effect of self-regulated learning interventions on achievement in higher education: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 31, 100341. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Xie, K., Hensley, L. C., Law, V., & Sun, Z. (2019). Self-regulation as a function of perceived leadership and cohesion in small group online collaborative learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 456–468. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Zheng, L., Li, X., & Huang, R. (2020). The influence of self-regulated learning on learning effectiveness in MOOC: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 153, 103902. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study