Doctoral Life in Metaphor: A Corpus-Assisted Analysis of Social Media Narratives
Authors
Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Perak, 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia. (Malaysia)
Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Perak, 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia. (Malaysia)
Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Perak, 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia. (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1026EDU0212
Subject Category: Applied Linguistics
Volume/Issue: 10/26 | Page No: 2603-2616
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-04-15
Accepted: 2026-04-20
Published: 2026-05-06
Abstract
This research delves into how the PhD experience is conceptualised metaphorically in social media discourse. Through the use of Conceptual Metaphor Theory (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980) and a corpus-based approach, a small-sized corpus of social media posts was compiled and analysed. The social media posts were taken from social media platforms like Threads, Facebook, and Reddit. Social media posts that contain the word “PhD” were manually compiled and thematically selected to focus on PhD students’ personal experiences. Through the use of Lancsbox, keyword and concordance analyses were implemented to detect recurring metaphorical patterns. The findings indicate prominent framings of the PhD experience metaphors that include JOURNEY, CONTAINER, WAR, ENTITY, BOOK, VEHICLE, SPORTS, and JOB. Each of the identified metaphors highlights different positive and negative perspectives of doctoral study. These framings of metaphors indicate the PhD students’ challenges and motivations which shed some lights in understanding how these researchers metaphorically construct their academic identities in social media discourse. The research contributes to an understanding of academic experiences through metaphors and highlights the signifance of metaphor in destigmatising academic pressure and normalising vulnerability in doctoral life.
Keywords
PhD experience, metaphor, corpus-based analysis, social media.
Downloads
References
1. Aleisa, N. A. A. (2022). Graduate student’s use of social media as a learning space. Cogent Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.2010486 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Baptista, A.V. & Huet, I. (2012). Making sense of metaphors about doctoral students’ competences” Analysis of supervisors’ voices. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 930–937. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.759 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Cameron, L., & Maslen, R. (Eds.). (2010). Metaphor Analysis: Research Practice in Applied Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities. London: Equinox. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Cardoso, S., Tavares, O., & Sin, C. (2020). Structural and Institutional Transformations in Doctoral Education: Social, Political and Student Expectations. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-38046-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Carter, S., & Pitcher, R. (2010). Extended metaphors for pedagogy: using sameness and difference. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(5), 579–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2010.491904 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Di Benedetto, C. A., Lindgreen, A., & Ringberg, T. (2021). How to guide your PhD students. Industrial Marketing Management, 93, A4–A13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.04.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Draper, J. A., Buzzelli, A. A., & Holdan, E. G. (2016). The pattern of use of Twitter in one accelerated, cohort-based doctoral program. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 163-183. http://www.informingscience.org/Publications/3453 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Evans, T. M., Bira, L., Gastelum, J. B., Weiss, L. T., & Vanderford, N. L. (2018). Evidence for a mental health crisis in graduate education. Nature Biotechnology, 36(3), 282–284. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4089 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Glade-Wright, R. & Smyth, E.A. (2023). Metaphors for doctoral research: Fundamental tenets and creative courage. Journal of Writing and Writing Courses, 27(1), 1–14, https://textjournal.scholasticahq.com/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Guha, P. & Pande, D. (2021). A sentiment analysis of the PhD experience evidenced on Twitter. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 16, 513 – 531. https://doi.org/10.28945/4813 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Hughes C. & Tight M. (2013). “The metaphors we study by: the doctorate as a journey and/or as work.” Higher Education Research & Development, 32(5), 765–775. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Kokke, E. (2025). Social media and libraries. In Encyclopedia of libraries, librarianship, and information science (pp. 554–571). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Kwan, B. S. C. (2019). The use of metaphor in academic discourse: Mapping the field. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 38, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.12.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Lakoff G. & Johnson M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Marila, M. & Vuori, K. (2025). Student-Generated Allegory for Doctoral Supervision: The Case of [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Maritime Metaphors. Högre utbildning, 15(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.23865/hu.v15.7045 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Marshall, C. (2010). A research design for studio-based research in art. Teaching Artist Journal, 8(2), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/15411791003618597 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. McCulloch, A. (2013). The quest for the PhD: a better metaphor for doctoral education. International Journal for Researcher Development, 4(1), 55–66, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRD-05-2013-0008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Nacey, S. (2022). Systematic metaphors in Norwegian doctoral dissertation acknowledgements. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2022.2042847 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Partington, A., Duguid, A., & Taylor, C. (2013). Patterns and meanings in discourse: Theory and practice in corpus-assisted discourse studies (CADS). John Benjamins. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Phyo, W. M., Nikolov, M., & Hódi, Á. (2023). Doctoral students’ English academic writing experiences through metaphor analysis. Heliyon, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13293 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Schmidt, M., & Hansson, E. (2018). Doctoral students’ well-being: A literature review. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 13(1), 1508171. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6095025/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Semino E. (2008). Metaphor and Discourse. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Stanley, P. (2015). Writing the PhD journey(s): An autoethnography of zine-writing, angst, embodiment, and backpacker travels. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 44(2), 143–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241614528708 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. John Benjamins. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Wan, W., & Low, G. (2022). Metaphor use as a window into learners’ identities and emotions. International Journal of English Language & Literature Studies, 11(3), 75–87. https://journals.aiac.org.au/index.php/IJELS/article/view/6470 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]