Drivers and Obstacles: A Narrative Review of Green Technology Adoption in SMEs
Authors
Universiti Utara Malaysia (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100538
Subject Category: Management
Volume/Issue: 9/11 | Page No: 6903-6917
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-12-09
Accepted: 2025-12-16
Published: 2025-12-23
Abstract
Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are pivotal to economic development yet major contributors to industrial pollution, underscoring the need for their adoption of green technologies for sustainable transitions. This narrative review synthesizes findings from 122 studies (2009–2025) to map the complex landscape of obstacles and enablers influencing green technology adoption in SMEs globally. Drawing on institutional theory, resource-based, and diffusion-of-innovation perspectives, the analysis, spanning diverse geographic regions (Europe, Asia, emerging economies) and sectors (manufacturing, services), identifies financial constraints (high initial costs, limited capital access) as the most pervasive barrier, especially in developing economies. Additional challenges include knowledge gaps, regulatory complexities, and organizational inertia. Conversely, strong internal drivers (managerial commitment, environmental values) coupled with external support (government incentives, collaborative networks, market pressures) significantly promote adoption. The review highlights the dynamic interplay and contextual dependence of these factors, underscoring how targeted policy and strategic management can overcome barriers. Emerging trends, such as digitalization and circular economy principles, present new pathways for SME engagement. By integrating these insights, the review proposes a testable conceptual framework that delineates the direct, moderating, and interactive roles of key factors, providing a structured foundation for future research, policy design, and managerial practice aimed at accelerating the uptake of green technologies in the vital SME sector.
Keywords
Green technology adoption, Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), Barriers
Downloads
References
1. Aboelmaged, M., & Hashem, G. (2019). Absorptive capacity and green innovation adoption in SMEs: The mediating effects of sustainable organisational capabilities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 220, 853–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.150 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Ansari, Z. N., & Kant, R. (2021). A plithogenic based neutrosophic analytic hierarchy process framework to analyse the barriers hindering adoption of eco-innovation practices in supply chain. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 14(6), 1509–1524. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2021.1998842 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Aristei, D., & Gallo, M. (2021). The role of external support on the implementation of Resource Efficiency actions: Evidence from European manufacturing firms. Sustainability, 13(17), 9531. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179531 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Austin, A., Alataş, S., & Agbonifi, D. (2025). Financing Eco‐innovation in an emerging economy: The role of internal resources, external support and government in Turkish SMEs. Sustainable Development, sd.70260. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70260 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Bag, S., Dhamija, P., Bryde, D. J., & Singh, R. K. (2022). Effect of eco-innovation on green supply chain management, circular economy capability, and performance of small and medium enterprises. Journal of Business Research, 141, 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Bakar, M. F. A., Talukder, M., Quazi, A., & Khan, I. (2020). Adoption of sustainable technology in the Malaysian SMEs sector: Does the role of government matter? Information. 11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Celestin, B. N., & Dorcas, K. D. (2024). Eco-innovation in waste recycling industry in Ghana: Modeling the upper echelon behavioral drivers of grass root innovation among SEED award winners. SAGE Open, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231198151 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Chibelushi, C., & Costello, P. (2009). Challenges facing W. Midlands ICT‐oriented SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 16(2), 210–239. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000910956029 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Demirel, P., & Danisman, G. O. (2019). Eco‐innovation and firm growth in the circular economy: Evidence from European small and medium‐sized enterprises. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(8), 1608–1618. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2336 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Fahad, S., Alnori, F., Su, F., & Deng, J. (2022). Adoption of green innovation practices in SMEs sector: Evidence from an emerging economy. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 35(1), 5486–5501. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677x.2022.2029713 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Fernández-Muñiz, N., Triguero, Á., & de la Cuesta, M. (2024). Breaking down barriers: The adoption of eco‐innovation by SMEs and the influence of personality traits. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(7), 6565–6585. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3819 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. García-Quevedo, J., Jové-Llopis, E., & Martínez-Ros, E. (2020). Barriers to the circular economy in European small and medium‐sized firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(6), 2450–2464. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2513 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Gupta, H., & Barua, M. K. (2018). A framework to overcome barriers to green innovation in SMEs using BWM and Fuzzy TOPSIS. The Science of the Total Environment, 633, 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.173 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Ha, L. T., Nam, P. X., & Thanh, T. T. (2021). Effects of bribery on firms’ environmental innovation adoption in Vietnam: Mediating roles of firms’ bargaining power and credit and institutional constraints. Ecological Economics: The Journal of the International Society for Ecological Economics, 185(107042). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107042 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Han, M. S., & Chen, W. (2021). Determinants of eco-innovation adoption of small and medium enterprises: An empirical analysis in Myanmar. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173(121146), 121146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121146 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Hojnik, J., & Ruzzier, M. (2016). The driving forces of process eco-innovation and its impact on performance: Insights from Slovenia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, 812–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Isensee, C., Teuteberg, F., Griese, K.-M., & Topi, C. (2020). The relationship between organizational culture, sustainability, and digitalization in SMEs: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275(122944), 122944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122944 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Kiefer, C. P., del Río, P., & Carrillo-Hermosilla, J. (2021). On the contribution of eco‐innovation features to a circular economy: A microlevel quantitative approach. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4), 1531–1547. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2688 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Klewitz, J., Zeyen, A., & Hansen, E. G. (2012). Intermediaries driving eco‐innovation in SMEs: A qualitative investigation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 15(4), 442–467. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601061211272376 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Marin, G., Marzucchi, A., & Zoboli, R. (2015). SMEs and barriers to Eco-innovation in the EU: Exploring different firm profiles. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 25(3), 671–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-015-0407-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Marrucci, L., Iannone, F., Daddi, T., & Iraldo, F. (2022). Antecedents of absorptive capacity in the development of circular economy business models of small and medium enterprises. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 532–544. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2908 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Mitchell, S., O’Dowd, P., & Dimache, A. (2020). Manufacturing SMEs doing it for themselves: Developing, testing and piloting an online sustainability and eco-innovation toolkit for SMEs. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 13(3), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2019.1685609 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Pronti, A., Zecca, E., & Antonioli, D. (2024). Micro is beautiful. Adoption of eco‐innovations in micro‐firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(2), 1341–1368. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3553 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Ren, Q., & Albrecht, J. (2023). Toward circular economy: The impact of policy instruments on circular economy innovation for European small medium enterprises. Ecological Economics: The Journal of the International Society for Ecological Economics, 207(107761). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107761 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Rybarova, D., Remenova, K., Kmety Bartekova, M., & Majduchova, H. (2023). Analysis of the attitudes of central European small and medium-sized enterprises towards adaptation to the low-carbon economy and its implementation barriers. Energies. 16(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/en16227663 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Sáez-Martínez, F. J., Díaz-García, C., & Gonzalez-Moreno, A. (2016). Firm technological trajectory as a driver of eco-innovation in young small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 138, 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.108 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Segarra-Blasco, A., Teruel, M., & Tomàs-Porres, J. (2024). Circular economy and public policies: A dynamic analysis for European SMEs. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(4), 3532–3549. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3674 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Shahin, V., Alimohammadlou, M., & Abbasi, A. (2024). Identifying and prioritizing the barriers to green innovation in SMEs and the strategies to counteract the barriers: An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 204(123408), 123408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123408 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Spigarelli, F., Compagnucci, L., & Lepore, D. (2025). Blockchain unlocking collaborative opportunities for environmental sustainability through innovation intermediaries. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 50(2), 516–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-024-10106-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Srisathan, W. A., Worrakittikul, W., Rattanapon, K., Hongto, T., Sakhonnakon, A. P. N., & Naruetharadhol, P. (2025). Digitalisation to zero-waste: The interplay of open eco-innovation and the circular economy in agricultural enterprises. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 18(1), 1–21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Triguero, A., Moreno-Mondéjar, L., & Davia, M. A. (2015). Eco-innovation by small and medium-sized firms in Europe: From end-of-pipe to cleaner technologies. Innovation, 17(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2015.1011059 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Triguero, A., Moreno-Mondéjar, L., & Davia, M. A. (2013). Drivers of different types of eco-innovation in European SMEs. Ecological Economics: The Journal of the International Society for Ecological Economics, 92, 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Triguero, A., Moreno-Mondéjar, L., & Davia, M. A. (2014). The influence of energy prices on adoption of clean technologies and recycling: Evidence from European SMEs. Energy Economics, 46, 246–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.09.020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Wielgorka, D., & Szczepaniak, W. (2019). Eco-innovation of enterprises operating in Poland against the background of EU countries. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management-GJESM, 5, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Yoshino, M., Sadlek, B., Yarime, M., & Ali, A. (2025). Knowledge absorption pathways for eco-innovation: An empirical analysis of small and medium-sized enterprises in the European Union. European Journal of Innovation Management, 28(2), 426–453. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Zhou, Y., Xu, G., Minshall, T., & Liu, P. (2015). How do public demonstration projects promote green-manufacturing technologies? A case study from China: How public demonstration projects promote green-manufacturing technologies. Sustainable Development, 23(4), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1589 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
- Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
- A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
- The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
- Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria