Educational Factors, Self-Efficacy and Mathematical Proficiency of Students: A Mediation Analysis

In fact, students' ability to learn mathematics is still an issue because even when there have been improvements in terms of teaching methods, a number of students continue to perform poorly in the subject area. The present study looked into the association between educational factors and mathematical proficiency of grade seven students, focusing on the mediating effect of self-efficacy. Based on Self-Efficacy Theory (Bandura, 1997), the study identified the effect of instructional techniques, learning materials, and classroom settings on students' mathematics performance. Quantitative methodology was used for this study, with a sample size of 332 Grade 7 students. Survey questionnaires and mathematics proficiency test were utilized in collecting data. Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and mediation analysis were used to analyze data. Findings indicated that students had positive perceptions about education-related variables, especially in terms of instructional techniques. Moreover, students had high self-efficacy levels, but they also experienced mathematics anxiety to some extent. Nonetheless, students performed poorly in mathematics proficiency, specifically in conceptual understanding.
Furthermore, it was found out that there is a statistically significant influence of the educational variables on the math ability with a very low effect size. The self-efficacy was found to be an important mediator variable for the relationship between educational variables and math achievement. It means that enhancing the self-confidence of learners is as influential as optimizing learning conditions.

self-efficacy, math competence, educational variables

1. Abas, M. L., Usman, A. M., & Lidasan, R. (2023). Teaching strategies and student learning outcomes in mathematics among public schools in Maguindanao del Sur. Mindanao Journal of Educational Research, 12(1), 55–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Anthony, G., & Walshaw, M. (2009). Characteristics of effective teaching of mathematics: A view from the West. Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(2), 147–164. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Attard, C. (2013). Engaging students in mathematics using technology. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013- 0063-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ayo, K. F., & Lumayag, R. G. (2020). Mathematics self-efficacy and academic performance of junior high school students in Region XII. Philippine Journal of Educational Studies, 88(2), 77–89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Balogun, A., Adewale, O., & Ogunleye, A. (2021). Educational support and mathematics achievement: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Measurement and Statistics, 15(3), 145–162. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Boaler, J., Chen, L., & Williams, C. (2022). Contextual learning and conceptual understanding in mathematics classrooms. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 65, 100912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2022.100912 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Brenner, M., & Herrmann, S. (2018). Analytical thinking and reasoning in mathematics education: Predictors of STEM success. Educational Research Review, 25, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Cabakcor, B. O., Dikici, R., & Yildiz, B. (2011). The impact of formative assessment on students’ problem-solving performance in mathematics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 451–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.120 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Cai, J., & Wang, Y. (2020). Examining mathematical mindset, self-efficacy, and performance using structural equation modeling. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00243-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Dapito, M. R., & Domingo, A. M. (2022). Structural equation model of self-efficacy and mathematics achievement among junior high school students. Philippine Social Science Review, 74(2), 101–116. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Dela Cruz, J. B., & Rosales, E. V. (2022). Predictors of mathematical achievement among Grade 7 students in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Educational Psychology, 6(1), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Department of Education (DepEd). (2013). K to 12 basic education curriculum guide in mathematics. Department of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Department of Education (DepEd). (2023). National Achievement Test results: Regional performance report 2023. Department of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., & Mac Iver, D. (1983). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage–environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48(2), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.2.90 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Garcia, R. M., Santos, J. P., & Villarin, L. A. (2023). Study habits, self-efficacy, and mathematics achievement among junior high students. Philippine Educational Measurement Journal, 11(2), 88–102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Hanushek, E. A., Peterson, P. E., & Woessmann, L. (2013). Endangering prosperity: A global view of the American school. Brookings Institution Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hattie, J. (2013). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kim, J., & Cho, Y. (2023). Modeling classroom climate, self-efficacy, and mathematicsachievement among Korean students. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 32(2), 205–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-022-00703-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Liu, M., Wang, J., & Zhao, Y. (2021). Teacher–student relationships and mathematics performance: A multilevel SEM analysis. Educational Psychology, 41(6), 711–728. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2020.1835147 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Mendoza, L. F., & Caballero, R. J. (2021). Instructional feedback and mathematics achievement among junior high learners in Mindanao. Journal of Pedagogical Research,5(4), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2021.104 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Middleton, J. A. (2013). Motivation and mathematics learning: Integrating theory and practice. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25(4), 473–490. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Murayama, K., Pekrun, R., Lichtenfeld, S., & Vom Hofe, R. (2013). Predicting long-term growth in students’ mathematics achievement: The unique contributions of motivation and cognitive strategies. Child Development, 84(4), 1475–1490. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12036 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2020). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. NCTM. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2022). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning outcomes. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/20f54027-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Pajares, F., & Urdan, T. (2019). Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. Information Age Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children (M. Cook, Trans.). International Universities Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2021). Teacher self-efficacy and perceived autonomy: Relations with teacher engagement, job satisfaction, and emotional exhaustion. Psychological Reports, 124(4), 1359–1382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294119868791 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Suh, J. M., Johnston, C., & Jamieson, S. (2008). Technology as a tool to develop conceptual understanding in mathematics. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 13(9), 521–526. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Taguma, M., Lin, H., & Hino, K. (2023). Student proficiency in mathematics: Patterns and challenges in 21st century learning. OECD Education Working Papers, 295, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1787/edwp-295-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2017). Motivational pathways to STEM achievement: The role of classroom climate and student beliefs. Child Development, 88(2), 482–496. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12674 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981–1015. https://doi.org/1 0.3102/0034654315626801 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Interplay of Students’ Emotional Intelligence and Attitude toward Mathematics on Performance in Grade 10 Algebra
• Numerical Simulation of Fitzhugh-Nagumo Dynamics Using a Finite Difference-Based Method of Lines
• Fixed Point Theorem in Controlled Metric Spaces
• Usage of Moving Average to Heart Rate, Blood Pressure and Blood Sugar
• Exploring Algebraic Topology and Homotopy Theory: Methods, Empirical Data, and Numerical Examples