Educational Technology Course Design in Pre-Service Teachers Education: A Bibliometric Review of the Research Landscape

The integration of Educational Technology (EdTech) courses within pre-service teacher education programs is crucial for equipping future educators with the competencies to leverage technology in their teaching practices effectively. This study employs a bibliometric analysis to map the research landscape of EdTech course design for pre-service teachers. From Scopus database covering the period from 2020 to 2025, a total of 920 relevant publications were identified and analysed by using tools such as biblioMagika® and VOSviewer. The findings reveal a significant increase in research output in this field, and Germany, Spain, Turkey, the United States, and Australia have been the leading contributors. Three dominant thematic clusters emerged from the co-occurrence analysis, teacher education core, technology integration in learning environments, and institutional contexts and design frameworks. Based on 110 analysed publications, these clusters reflect the field’s shift from technical skill training to holistic pedagogical reasoning. The study also identifies challenges, including the theory-practice gap, equity and access issues, and the rapid evolution of technologies such as AI and immersive platforms. It calls for a balanced approach to EdTech course design, which prioritises pedagogical adaptability, addresses equity gaps, and embeds ethical frameworks for emerging technologies. Findings advocate for educational technology courses with strong teaching adaptability and a focus on fairness to enhance the capabilities of future educators.

Educational Technology; Pre-service Teachers; Course Design; Bibliometrics

1. Aghaei Chadegani, A., Salehi, H., Md Yunus, M. M., Farhadi, H., Fooladi, M., Farhadi, M., & Ale Ebrahim, N. (2013). A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of Science and Scopus databases. Asian Social Science, 9(5), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n5p18 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ahmi, A. (2023). biblioMagika. https://aidi-ahmi.com/index.php/bibliomagika [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Backfisch, I., Lachner, A., Hische, C., Loose, F., Scheiter, K. (2020). Professional knowledge or motivation? Investigating the role of teachers’ expertise on the quality of technology-enhanced lesson plans. Learning and Instruction, 66, 101300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101300 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bereczki, E. O., & Kárpáti, A. (2021). Technology-enhanced creativity: A multiple case study of digital technology-integration expert teachers’ beliefs and practices. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39,100791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100791 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Boateng, S. L., Penu, O. K. A., Boateng, R., Budu, J., Marfo, J. S., & Asamoah, P. (2024). Educational technologies and elementary level education – A bibliometric review of Scopus indexed journal articles [Review]. Heliyon, *10*(7), Article e28101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, *40*(3), 291-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1315399 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, *133*, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, *42*(3), 255-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. García-Vandewalle García, J. M., et al. (2023). Analysis of digital competence of educators (DigCompEdu) in teacher trainees. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 28:585–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09546-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Gökdaş, İ., Karacaoğlu, Ö. C., & Özkaya, A. (2024). COVID-19 and teachers’ digital competencies: a comprehensive bibliometric and topic modeling analysis [Review]. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, *11*(1), Article 1740. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04335-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Howard, S. K., Tondeur, J., Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2021). Ready, set, go! Profiling teachers’ readiness for online teaching in secondary education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, *30*(1), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1839543 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2017). ISTE standards for educators. ISTE. https://www.iste.org/standards/iste-standards-for-teachers [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kimmons, R., Graham, C. R., & West, R. E. (2020). The PICRAT model for technology integration in teacher preparation. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, *20*(1), 176-198. https://citejournal.org/volume-20/issue-1-20/general/the-picrat-model-for-technology-integration-in-teacher-preparation [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kopcha, T. J., Neumann, K. L., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., & Pitman, E. (2020). Process over product: The next evolution of our quest for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, *68*(2), 729-749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09735-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Mariappan, P., Khairani, M. Z., Mohd, N., Chanthiran, M., & Cubalit, A. N. (2024). Uncovering Emerging Trends in Technology and Art Education: A Bibliometric Mapping Analysis [Article]. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, *41*(1), 64–75. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.41.1.6475 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, *108*(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Mouza, C., Karchmer-Klein, R., Nandakumar, R., Yilmaz Ozden, S., & Hu, L. (2014). Investigating the impact of an integrated approach to the development of preservice teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, *71*, 206–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Nazaretsky, T., et al. (2022). Teachers’ trust in AI-powered educational technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(5), 231. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., Mcdonald, S., … Mckenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. The BMJ, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Polly, D., Mims, C., Shepherd, C. E., & Inan, F. (2010). Evidence of impact: Transforming teacher education with preparing tomorrow’s teachers to teach with technology (PT3) grants. Teaching and Teacher Education, *26*(4), 863–870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.024 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Puentedura, R. R. (2006). Transformation, technology, and education. [Blog post]. Hippasus. http://hippasus.com/resources/tte/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. (Y. Punie, Ed.). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Sailer, M., Murböck, J., & Fischer, F. (2021). Digital learning in schools: What does it take beyond digital technology? Teaching and Teacher Education, *103*, 103346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103346 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Scherer, R., Tondeur, J., & Siddiq, F. (2021). On the quest for validity: Testing the factor structure and measurement invariance of the technology-dimensions in the Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge (TPACK) model. Computers & Education, *167*, 104184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104184 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Su, J. (2023). Preservice teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge development: A bibliometric review [Short survey]. Frontiers in Education, *7*, Article 1033895. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1033895 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Tondeur, J., Aesaert, K., Prestridge, S., & Consuegra, E. (2018). A multilevel analysis of what matters in the training of pre-service teacher’s ICT competencies. Computers & Education, 122, 32-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, *59*(1), 134-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000385723 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge – a review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, *29*(2), 109-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Wu, H., Balakrishnan, V., & Cai, X. (2024). Bibliometric Analysis on Pre-service Teachers’ TPACK: A Comparative Research between Web of Science and China National Knowledge Infrastructure from 2010 to 2022. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, *18*(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• LeafQuest: A Mobile-Based Augmented Reality for Plant Placement, Discovery, and Growth
• Participatory Ergonomic Intervention Approach on Musculoskeletal Disorder (MSD) in Construction Sectors: A Systematic Review
• Integrating GIS into Traffic Incident Management: A Web-Based System
• RideSmart: A Personalized Motorcycle Product Recommendation System Using TF-IDF and Descriptive Analytics for Javidson Motorshop
• Digital Tools for Constructive Alignment in Science Education: A Systematic Synthesis of Technology Enhanced Motivation and Assessment