Educational Technology Proficiency and Classroom Integration: A Profile-Based Analysis of Public School Teachers

This study assessed the level of educational technology (EdTech) proficiency and its integration into classroom practices among public school teachers in Teachers of San Miguel 1 District", San Miguel, Surigao del Sur. Using a quantitative descriptive research design, the study examined teachers’ profiles in terms of age, gender, position, highest educational attainment, length of service, and EdTech-related training. It further determined the level of EdTech proficiency across four domains: digital literacy, integration of technology into the curriculum, capability to use technology, and enhancement of digital competencies. In addition, the study evaluated the extent of EdTech integration in classroom practices based on Results-Based Performance Management System (RPMS) indicators, including lesson exemplars, technologically enhanced class activities, assessment practices, and student feedback.
Data were gathered through a structured survey questionnaire administered to all teachers in the school using total enumeration sampling. The results revealed that respondents generally demonstrated a proficient level of EdTech competence and integration, with the highest level observed in curriculum integration and lesson exemplars. However, assessment technology integration emerged as the lowest area, indicating a gap in the use of digital tools for evaluating student learning. These findings suggest that while teachers are capable of integrating technology in instruction, there is a need to strengthen their competencies in digital assessment and advanced applications of EdTech.
Based on the findings, an intervention plan (Project i-TEACH) was proposed to enhance teachers’ digital skills, promote continuous professional development, and improve the overall quality of technology integration in teaching. The study highlights the importance of sustained training, mentoring, and institutional support in advancing effective and meaningful use of educational technology.

EdTech proficiency, technology integration

1. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2007). Variations in the conditions for teachers’ professional learning and development: Sustaining commitment and effectiveness over a career. Oxford Review of Education, 33(4), 423–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980701450746 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Desimone, L. M., & Garet, M. S. (2015). Best practices in teachers’ professional development in the United States. Psychology, Society, & Education, 7(3), 252–263. https://doi.org/10.25115/psye.v7i3.515 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Halim, A. (2023). Teachers’ readiness in digital assessment integration in education. International Journal of Instruction, 16(1), 245–260. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Huberman, M. (1993). The lives of teachers. Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Instefjord, E. J., & Munthe, E. (2017). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology: An analysis of the emphasis on digital competence in teacher education curricula. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(4), 547–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1342242 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Jatileni, M., Amadhila, E. M., & Shuumbili, T. (2024). Gender differences in teachers’ perceptions of artificial intelligence in education. Education and Information Technologies, 29(2), 1453–1472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11935-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547–588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. OECD. (2019). TALIS 2018 results (Volume I): Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. OECD. (2020). Education at a glance 2020: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. OECD. (2023). Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Rulyansah, A., et al. (2022). Challenges in implementing digital assessment in classroom settings. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 51(2), 145–160. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2021). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. OpenAI. (2026). ChatGPT (GPT-5.3) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study