Effect of Audit Firm Rotation and Audit Quality in the Nigerian Public Sector Evidence from Selected Audit Firms in Ibada

This study examined the effect of audit firm rotation on audit quality in the Nigerian public sector using selected audit firms in Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria. The study investigated the effect of audit firm rotation on audit quality, auditor independence, and the challenges associated with implementing audit firm rotation in the public sector. A descriptive survey research design was adopted. The population comprised audit partners, audit seniors, internal auditors, and government audit officers in Ibadan. Using stratified random sampling technique, a sample size of 40 respondents was selected, while 36 valid questionnaires were analyzed. Data were collected through structured questionnaires and analyzed using descriptive statistics and regression analysis with the aid of SPSS. The findings revealed that audit firm rotation has a significant positive effect on audit quality and auditor independence in the Nigerian public sector. The study also identified challenges such as high transition costs, loss of client-specific knowledge, and weak regulatory enforcement. The study concluded that audit firm rotation enhances audit quality and strengthens public confidence in financial reporting. It recommended stronger enforcement of audit rotation policies and continuous professional training for auditors.

Audit Firm Rotation, Audit Quality, Auditor Independence, Public Sector, Nigeria

1. Association of Chartered Certified Accountants. (2022). Audit quality and professional skepticism in modern auditing practice. ACCA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., García-Sánchez, I. M., & Rodríguez-Ariza, L. (2023). Public sector governance and stewardship mechanisms: Evidence from accountability systems. Public Management Review, 25(3), 412–430. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Deloitte. (2024). Audit quality and transparency in the public sector: Global insights report. Deloitte Insights. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ernst & Young. (2024). Digital transformation and audit quality in public institutions. EY Global Review. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Financial Reporting Council of Nigeria. (2024). Audit regulation and professional standards compliance report. FRCN. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. (2023). Handbook of international quality management, auditing, review, other assurance, and related services pronouncements. IAASB. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. (2024). Quality management standards implementation guide. IAASB. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. International Federation of Accountants. (2023). Global audit quality framework and professional skepticism guidance. IFAC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. International Federation of Accountants. (2023). Enhancing audit evidence and reporting standards in public sector audits. IFAC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. International Federation of Accountants. (2023). Audit independence and rotation policy framework. IFAC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions. (2023). Principles of transparency and accountability in public sector auditing. INTOSAI. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions. (2023). Ethical standards for public sector auditing research. INTOSAI. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions. (2023). Guidelines for public sector audit evidence collection. INTOSAI. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions. (2023). Public sector audit quality measurement standards. INTOSAI. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (2023). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure (Updated application in public sector governance). Journal of Financial Economics, 149(2), 1–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Knechel, W. R., Vanstraelen, A., & Zerni, M. (2023). Audit quality and regulation: Evidence from global audit markets. The Accounting Review, 98(1), 1–28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. KPMG. (2023). Global audit quality insights report. KPMG International. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Public integrity and audit effectiveness in developing economies. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Survey methodology in public accountability research. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Statistical methods in audit research. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024). Enhancing audit quality through governance reforms. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. (2023). Audit quality indicators and firm rotation policy review. PCAOB. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2023). The future of audit: Technology, risk, and assurance. PwC Global. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Schillemans, T., & Bjurstrøm, K. H. (2023). Trust, accountability, and stewardship in public organizations. Governance, 36(2), 345–362. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Van Slyke, D. M., & Hammerschmid, G. (2024). Stewardship and public management: Reassessing governance relationships. Public Administration Review, 84(1), 22–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. World Bank. (2024). Nigeria public financial management and governance report. World Bank Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. World Bank. (2024). Strengthening audit institutions in public financial systems. World Bank Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. World Bank. (2024). Research ethics and governance standards in accountability studies. World Bank Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. World Bank. (2024). Econometric modeling in governance and audit studies. World Bank Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. World Bank. (2024). Methodological standards for governance and accountability research. World Bank Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. World Bank. (2024). Research ethics and data protection in governance studies. World Bank Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Role of Value and Growth Stocks in Portfolio Returns: Insights From the Nigerian Stock Market
• The Impact of Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) and Profitability on Firm Value Moderated by Firm Size
• Assessment of the Impact of Environmental Operating Costs on Return on Assets: Evidence from Listed Breweries in Nigeria
• Mobile Money and Digital Financial Services Ecosystem in Adamawa State
• A Quantitative Approach of Professional Skepticism and Fraud Detection among Malaysian Internal Auditors