Effect of Cognitive Load Theory Based Instruction on Arabic-English Translation Performance among Hausa Speaking Undergraduates in North-West Nigeria

Arabic-English translation is essential for professional, academic, and religious communication in multilingual settings like North-West Nigeria. However, due to the cognitive demands of processing two languages at once, Hausa-speaking undergraduates frequently have ongoing challenges in completing efficient translation tasks. The study investigates how cognitive load theory-based instruction affects Arabic-English translation performance among Hausa-speaking undergraduates. It also looks at how important translation components—text segmentation and comprehension, expression clarity and fluency, and handling complex structures—respond to cognitively informed instructional strategies. A pre-experimental one-group pre-test and post-test design is used in the study. Using random sampling methods, sixty third-year Arabic undergraduate students from three universities in North-West Nigeria were chosen. Structured translation tests were used to gather data both before and after a six-week Cognitive Load Theory-based instructional intervention. Descriptive statistics and paired sample t-tests were used to assess the data. The results show that following the intervention, pupils' translation proficiency improved statistically significantly (p <.001). Notably, managing complicated structures showed the biggest gain, followed by text segmentation and comprehension, clarity, and fluency. The findings show that cognitively informed teaching methods improve translation proficiency and successfully lessen cognitive overload. The study concludes that Cognitive Load significantly influences translation performance in multilingual contexts and suggests incorporating Cognitive Load Theory into translating education to enhance overall learning outcomes, accuracy, and fluency

Cognitive Load Theory (CLT) , Arabic–English Translation . Translation Performance, Hausa-speaking Undergraduates , Multilingual Education

1. Aliyu, A., et al. (2023). Translation Errors Among Bilingual Arabic Language Students: Collocations as an Example. Journal, 24(1), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.37575/h/lng/220028 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Almubark, A. A., Manan, A., & Al-Zubaid, K. (2014). The hindrances in translating specific cultural concepts from Arabic into English. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 19(3), 166–173. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al-Shloul, W. (2023). A qualitative analysis of language and culture barriers confronting student translators. Arab World English Journal for Translation & Literary Studies, 7(3), 109–124. http://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awejtls/vol7no3.8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Asiri, E., Qassem, M., & Sahari, Y. (2024). Navigating cultural landscapes: Textual insights into English–Arabic–English translation. Open Cultural Studies, 8(1), 20240009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bygate, M. (2001). Speaking. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chen, L. (2025). Examining cognitive load in human-machine collaborative translation: Insights from eye-tracking experiments of Chinese-English translation. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1570929. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1570929 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Daffa-Allah, J. M. (2025). Linguistic and cultural barriers in translating English idioms into Arabic. Journal of Ecohumanism, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v4i2.6350 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Elhadary, T. (2023). Linguistic and cultural differences between English and Arabic languages and their impact on the translation process. International Journal of Language and Translation Research, 3(2), 103–117. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hyland, K. (2003). Second Language Writing. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Keller, K. (2008). Cognition and Second Language Instruction. University of Minnesota Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Liu, T., Wang, Y., Wang, Z., & Yu, H. (2025). Exploring cognitive effort and divergent thinking in metaphor translation using eye-tracking and EEG technology. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 18177. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Mekheimer, M. (2026). A diagnostic assessment of translation competence: Linguistic and intercultural gaps in Egyptian EFL programs. Language Testing in Asia, 16, Article 9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mohammed, J. M. D. A. (2025). Linguistic and cultural barriers in translating English idioms into Arabic. Journal of Ecohumanism, 4(2), 820–837. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Mossop, B. (2014). Empirical Research on Translation and Interpreting: The State of the Art and Future Prospects. John Benjamins. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Mutahar Qassem. (2024). Adequacy, fluency and cognitive processes: Evidence from translating English news articles into Arabic. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(5), 2249–2264. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2144893 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Nida, E. A., & Taber, C. R. (1982). The Theory and Practice of Translation. Brill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Shehab, E. (2016). The Problems Involved in Translating Arabic Cognitive Synonyms into English. مجلة الجامعة الإسلامية للبحوث الإنسانية, 17(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive Load Theory. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022193728205 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Doctoral Life in Metaphor: A Corpus-Assisted Analysis of Social Media Narratives
• A Morphological Typology-Based Comparative Study of Word Formation in Vietnamese and Japanese
• Constructing the Rupiah Depreciation: A Comparative Transitivity Analysis of News Coverage in the Jakarta Post and Antara News
• The Influence of Writing Strategies on Different Types of Writing Anxiety
• First Year University Students and What They Believe About Learning a Second Language