Effective Teaching Strategies for Students with Disabilities in Vocational Settings: A Narrative Review of Evidence Based and Inclusive Approaches

This narrative review synthesizes current research on effective teaching strategies for students with disabilities in vocational education settings. The review aims to identify core instructional approaches, contextual challenges, and gaps in the literature to inform inclusive practice and guide future research. Students with disabilities in vocational pathways often face barriers related to communication, skill mastery, workplace readiness, and transition to employment. However, many also demonstrate strengths in practical learning, persistence, and task engagement when instruction is appropriately structured and individualized. These varying learner profiles highlight the need for teaching approaches that are both evidences based and responsive to the demands of vocational training environments. A structured search across Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, PubMed, Semantic Scholar, and Google Scholar yielded 50 high quality studies meeting predefined criteria. The included literature spans experimental, qualitative, mixed method, and review designs focusing on learners with intellectual, developmental, physical, and sensory disabilities. Findings consistently support systematic instructional strategies such as task analysis, response prompting, and video modelling, particularly for skill acquisition in hands on vocational tasks. Inclusive frameworks including Universal Design for Learning, differentiated instruction, and co teaching further enhance accessibility and participation. Technology enhanced tools, such as mobile learning and augmented reality, show promising potential but remain underexplored in terms of scalability and long-term outcomes. The review also underscores the importance of teacher preparedness, professional learning, and institutional support as critical conditions for effective implementation. Persistent gaps include limited culturally responsive practices, minimal research on learners with physical and sensory disabilities, and challenges integrating individualized and whole class inclusive models. This review contributes by consolidating evidence-based strategies and outlining context sensitive recommendations to strengthen inclusive vocational education

vocational education, students with disabilities, teaching strategies

1. Almumen, H. (2020). Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Across Cultures: The Application of UDL in Kuwaiti Inclusive Classrooms. SAGE Open, 10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020969674 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Assanbayev, A., & Makoelle, T. (2024). Practices Promoting the Inclusion of Adult Students with Disabilities in the Classroom: A Case of a Technical Vocational Education and Training College in Kazakhstan. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050529 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Brock, M., Cannella-Malone, H., Schaefer, J., Page, J., Andzik, N., & Seaman, R. (2016). Efficacy of training job coaches to implement evidence-based instructional strategies. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 45, 351 - 364. https://doi.org/10.3233/jvr-160835 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bunbury, S. (2020). Disability in higher education – do reasonable adjustments contribute to an inclusive curriculum?. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24, 964 - 979. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1503347 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cannella-Malone, H., & Schaefer, J. (2017). A Review of Research on Teaching People With Significant Disabilities Vocational Skills. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 40, 67 - 78. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143415583498 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cook, S., & Rao, K. (2018). Systematically Applying UDL to Effective Practices for Students With Learning Disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 41, 179 - 191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948717749936 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cumming, T., & Rose, M. (2021). Exploring universal design for learning as an accessibility tool in higher education: are view of the current literature. The Australian Educational Researcher, 49, 1025-1043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-021-00471-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Dahalan, K., & Toran, H. (2023). Teaching Vocational Skills to Students with Low Functioning Disabilities. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v12-i2/17357 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Damyanov, P. (2024). Effective Pedagogical Strategies and Support Mechanisms for Enhancing the Learning Outcomes of Students with Special Educational Needs: A Systematic Approach. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM). https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v12i10.el03 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Gallegos, M. (2019). Teaching Vocational Skills: Use of Video Prompting for Young Adults with Intellectual Disabilities. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Gilson, C., Carter, E., & Biggs, E. (2017). Systematic Review of Instructional Methods to Teach Employment Skills to Secondary Students With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 42, 107 - 89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796917698831 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Iacono, T., Landry, O., Garcia-Melgar, A., Spong, J., Hyett, N., Bagley, K., & McKinstry, C. (2021). A systematized review of co-teaching efficacy in enhancing inclusive education for students with disability. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 27, 1454 - 1468. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1900423 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ismaili, J., & Ibrahimi, E. (2017). Mobile learning as alternative to assistive technology devices for special needs students. Education and Information Technologies, 22, 883-899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9462-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Jobir, T. (2024). The Implementation of Inclusive Education in TVET Institutions: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Vocational Education and Training Research. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijvetr.20241002.15 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kellems, R., Cacciatore, G., & Osborne, K. (2019). Using an Augmented Reality–Based Teaching Strategy to Teach Mathematics to Secondary Students With Disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 42, 253 - 258. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143418822800 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. King‐Sears, M., Stefanidis, A., Berkeley, S., & Strogilos, V. (2021). Does Co-Teaching Improve Academic Achievement for Students with Disabilities? A Meta-Analysis. Educational Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100405 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kulkarni, S., Miller, A., Nusbaum, E., Pearson, H., & Brown, L. (2023). Toward disability-centered, culturally sustaining pedagogies in teacher education. Critical Studies in Education, 65, 107 - 127. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2023.2234952 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Lee, S., Lee, Y., & Park, E. (2023). Sustainable Vocational Preparation for Adults with Disabilities: A Metaverse-Based Approach. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151512000 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Mabeza, M., & Villacruz,, J. (2025). Challenges and Coping Strategies of Technical-Vocational Teachers in Implementing Inclusive Education for Learners with Disabilities. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation. https://doi.org/10.51244/ijrsi.2025.12060032 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Mahlangu, S., & Mtshali, T. (2024). Inclusive Education Strategies for Knowledge Development of Teachers Enrolled in the Advanced Vocational and Training Education Program. International Journal of Religion. https://doi.org/10.61707/bdbp4z72 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. McLucas, A., & Gonçalves, B. (2025). Using Practitioner-Implemented Video Models to Teach Vocational Social Skills in a Rural Public School. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals. https://doi.org/10.1177/21651434251328271 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Miller, E., Franco-Jenkins, X., Duncan, J., Reddi, A., & Ward, C. (2025). Strengthening Education Through Equitable and Inclusive Evidence-Based Teaching Practices: A Scoping Review. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030266 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Misador, I., & Cangayao, L. (2025). Lived Experienced of Teachers Handling Students with Intellectual Disabilities in the Virtual Learning System. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.90400120 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Moriña, A. (2020). Faculty members who engage in inclusive pedagogy: methodological and affective strategies for teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 27, 371 - 386. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1724938 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Naseem, A., Sami, A., & Haleem, B. (2025). Effective Teaching Strategies for Physically Disabled Students: A Reflective Approach. ProScholar Insights. https://doi.org/10.62997/psi.2025b-42061 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Pancsofar, N., & Petroff, J. (2016). Teachers’ experiences with co-teaching as a model for inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20, 1043 - 1053. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2016.1145264 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Posso-Pacheco, R., Maqueira-Caraballo, G., Isaac, R., Caicedo-Quiroz, R., Iglesias, S., & Barba-Miranda, L. (2025). Curricular adaptations in physical education: A global study on the inclusion of students with specific educational needs. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd10564 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Rao, K., & Meo, G. (2016). Using Universal Design for Learning to Design Standards-Based Lessons. SAGE Open, 6. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016680688 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Schroeder, C., Ragotzy, S., & Poling, A. (2022). Young adults with intellectual and other developmental disabilities acquire vocational skills with video prompting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 56, 181 - 200. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.963 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Shepley, C., Lane, J., & Ault, M. (2019). A Review and Critical Examination of the System of Least Prompts. Remedial and Special Education, 40, 313 - 327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517751213 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Singh, I. (2023). Culturally Responsive Practices in Special Education. Global International Research Thoughts. https://doi.org/10.36676/girt.2023-v11i1-09 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Stabnow, E., Rieger, H., & Sweeney, W. (2023). Increasing Pizza Box Assembly Using Task Analysis and a Least-To-Most Prompting Hierarchy. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 45, 169 - 191. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317107.2023.2170197 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Suyitno, S., Purwoko, R., Widiyono, Y., Jatmoko, D., Setuju, S., & Marsono, M. (2024). Work-based learning design for students with disabilities in vocational high schools. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v9i1.3622 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Wang, Z. (2025). Fairness of Disabled Students in Vocational Education. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/2025.22627 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Wenzel, J., Fisher, M., & Brodhead, M. (2021). Preparing Job Coaches to Implement Systematic Instructional Strategies to Teach Vocational Tasks. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 45, 71 - 85. https://doi.org/10.1177/21651434211041918 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Zhang, L., Carter, R., Greene, J., & Bernacki, M. (2024). Unraveling Challenges with the Implementation of Universal Design for Learning: A Systematic Literature Review. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09860-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Adequate Workshop Tools and Equipment on The Skill Development of Automobile and Metalwork Technology Education Students in South West Universities of Education in Nigeria