Effectiveness of Anti-Corruption Strategies in Restoring Public Trust in Government Institutions in Uganda

This study examined the effectiveness of anti-corruption strategies in restoring public trust in government institutions in Uganda. Specifically, it analyzed the anti-corruption strategies implemented, assessed their effectiveness in reducing corruption, and examined their influence on public trust. A mixed-methods approach based on a cross-sectional research design was adopted. Data were collected from a sample of 278 respondents drawn from public officials and citizens, using structured questionnaires and interview guides. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, while qualitative data were analyzed thematically. The findings revealed that although anti-corruption strategies such as legal frameworks, transparency initiatives, whistleblowing mechanisms, and institutional oversight structures were in place, their effectiveness was uneven. Transparency initiatives showed relatively positive outcomes, while enforcement of laws, institutional independence, and reporting mechanisms were perceived as less effective. Corruption was found to persist, particularly in procurement and administrative processes, while public trust in government institutions remained low. The study concluded that the existence of anti-corruption strategies alone was insufficient to restore public trust without consistent enforcement, institutional autonomy, and visible accountability. It recommended strengthening enforcement mechanisms, enhancing institutional independence, improving public awareness and reporting systems, and linking anti-corruption efforts to improved service delivery to rebuild public confidence.

Anti-corruption strategies; Public trust; Government institutions

1. Baez-Camargo, C., Bukuluki, P., Lugolobi, R., Stahl, C., Kassa, S., Paul Bukuluki, A., & consultant Kampala, I. (2017). Behavioural influences on attitudes towards petty corruption A Study of Social Norms and Mental Models in Uganda. www.baselgovernance.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Gebrihet, H. G. (2024). The effects of the perception of corruption on public trust in government in Africa: a comparative analysis. Politikon, 51(1–2), 18–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589346.2024.2344276 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Gumisiriza, P., & Mukobi, R. (2019). Effectiveness of anti-corruption measures in Uganda. Rule of Law and Anti-Corruption Center Journal, 2019(2). https://doi.org/10.5339/rolacc.2019.8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X (76)90026-X [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Kirunda, I. N., Dorcus, N., Doreen, U., Asaba, E. M., Nani, G. A., & Oyie, B. (2024). Exploring the Effects of Corruption on Administration of Justice in Uganda. Newport International Journal Of Current Research In Humanities And Social Sciences, 4(3), 75–79. https://doi.org/10.59298/NIJCRHSS/2024/4.3.7579 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Kohler, J. C., & Dimancesco, D. (2020). The risk of corruption in public pharmaceutical procurement: how anti-corruption, transparency and accountability measures may reduce this risk. Global Health Action, 13(sup1), 1694745. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2019.1694745 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Persson, A., Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2013). Why Anticorruption Reforms Fail—Systemic Corruption as a Collective Action Problem. Governance, 26(3), 449–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01604.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2008). What Is Quality of Government? A Theory of Impartial Government Institutions. Governance, 21(2), 165–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468- 0491.2008.00391.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. UNODC, U. N. O. on D. and C. (n.d.). Tools and Resources for Anti-Corruption Knowledge. Https://Track.Unodc.Org/Track/Index.Html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Zimmermann, T., & Riegner, M. (2023). Prosecuting Corruption in Kenya, Uganda and South Africa: A legal analysis for action in the field of development cooperation. https://trigeko.uni-trier.de [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study