Effectiveness of Body-Worn Cameras and Alternative Recording Devices in Law Enforcement Operations: Basis for Policy Enhancement

Authors

Dr. Nelson C. Dizon

Ret. Police Officer (PCapt.), Professor of University of aloocan City (Philippines)

Domingo P. Cabauatan Jr

Police Officer, CCPS-PNP (Philippines)

Dr. Cecille Mae C. Canilon

Professor of University of Caloocan City (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100300285

Subject Category: Law

Volume/Issue: 10/3 | Page No: 3842-3852

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-03-20

Accepted: 2026-03-25

Published: 2026-04-04

Abstract

The increasing public scrutiny of police practices and the growing demand for transparency and accountability have led to the adoption of technological innovations such as Body-Worn Cameras (BWCs) and Alternative Recording Devices (ARDs) in law enforcement. These tools are designed to document police-citizen interactions, enhance evidence collection, and improve operational efficiency. In the Philippines, their implementation was reinforced through Supreme Court A.M. No. 21-06-08-SC and Philippine National Police (PNP) operational policies. Despite their widespread adoption, the effectiveness of BWCs and ARDs remains a subject of ongoing evaluation due to mixed findings in existing studies and various operational challenges.
This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of BWCs and ARDs in selected police sub-stations in North Caloocan City during the academic year 2025–2026. Specifically, it examined their impact on police operations, police assistance, police response, court presentation, and public perception. It also identified the challenges encountered by law enforcement personnel and proposed recommendations for policy enhancement. The study employed a quantitative descriptive research design using purposive sampling, with 150 respondents composed of patrollers, investigators, and stakeholders. Data were gathered through a structured questionnaire and analyzed using frequency distribution, weighted mean, ranking, and One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA).
Findings revealed that BWCs and ARDs were generally assessed as very effective, particularly in improving documentation accuracy, accountability, decision-making, and the credibility of court evidence. However, their effectiveness in enhancing public trust and reducing citizen complaints was moderate. Key challenges identified included high acquisition and maintenance costs, storage limitations, inconsistent device activation, and privacy concerns. The study concludes that BWCs and ARDs are valuable tools in promoting transparency, accountability, and professionalism in policing. However, their effectiveness depends on proper implementation, financial sustainability, and efficient data management. It is recommended that law enforcement agencies adopt standardized protocols, strengthen training programs, ensure sustainable funding, enhance data security, and promote public awareness. Continuous monitoring and further research are encouraged to improve long-term effectiveness.

Keywords

Body-Worn Cameras (BWC), Alternative Recording Devices, Police Operations, Law Enforcement, Electronic Evidence.

Downloads

References

1. Anderson, J., & Clark, R. (2017). Assessing training needs in modern policing: A framework for tailored programs. Journal of Law Enforcement Training, 15(2), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Andrade, F., Ayon, A., Cebrero, J., Pagkaliwangan, J., Sarte, R., & Villa, E. B. (2024). Extent of implementation on the use of body worn camera in police operations: Basis for enhanced action plan. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 5(6), 2308–2315. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. AM Number 21-06-08- SC Rules on the Use of Body Worn Cameras in the Execution of Warrants [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bautista, M. (2019). Addressing gaps in police training methodologies: Recommendations for continuous professional development. Philippine Journal of Public Safety, 12(1), 23–38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Braga, A. A., & Weisburd, D. (2018). Problem-oriented policing and crime reduction: Evidence from a systematic review. Crime and Justice Review, 42(4), 27–45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Brown, C., & Martinez, L. (2020). Enhancing law enforcement operations through strategic deployment and community engagement. Journal of Police Strategy, 22(3), 67–89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Dela Cruz, P. (2020). Logistical challenges in Philippine police departments: Addressing resource allocation and equipment maintenance. Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 14(2), 92–105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ellis, T., Jenkins, C., & Smith, P. (2022). Unintended consequences of body-worn camera adoption: Insights from a British police force. Policing and Society, 32(7), 857–875. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Johnson, K. (2019). Logistical shortcomings and their impact on urban policing effectiveness. Journal of Law Enforcement Operations, 21(4), 78–91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Lawrence, D. S., et al. (2023). Can body-worn cameras reduce injuries during response? Journal of Experimental Criminology. Advance online publication. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Lum, C., & Koper, C. S. (2019). Evidence-based policing: Evaluating what works in modern law enforcement. Policing Journal, 13(1), 5–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mendoza, R. (2020). Improving training initiatives for better crime prevention and public safety outcomes. Philippine Journal of Criminology and Law Enforcement, 15(1), 56–71. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. NAPOLCOM Memorandum Circular (MC) No. 2019-002 dated January 29, 2019 entitled, "Defining the Duty and Authority of the NAPOLCOM to Prescribe Minimum Standards for Uniforms, Arms, and Equipment to be Procured by the Philippine National Police", [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. NAPOLCOM Resolution No. 2024-0547 dated May 31, 2024 entitled, "Prescribing the Minimum Standards for Body-Worn Camera"; [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. NAPOLCOM Resolution No. 2023-1612 dated November 30, 2023 entitled, 'Prescribing the Minimum Standards for Body-Worn and Dash Cameras", [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. NAPOLCOM Resolution No. 2017-369 dated July 5, 2017 entitled, "Approving the PNP-UESB Resolution No. 2017-010 dated March 14, 2017 that Prescribes the Minimum Standard Specifications for Body Worn and Dash Cameras"; [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Petersen, K., & Lu, Y. F. (2023). The downstream effects of body-worn cameras: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Justice Quarterly, 40(6), 765–790 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. PNP MC Number 2018-009 Operational Guidelines and Policies on the use of body worn camera [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. PNP MC Number 2014-49 Strengthening the police station patrol operations dated October 29, 2014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. PNP Supplemental Operational Guidelines in the Conduct of Anti-Illegal Drugs Campaign dated January 19,2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Revised Philippine National Police Operational Procedures dated December 2021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Technical Committee on Information Technology Resolution No. 202401 dated January 29, 2024 entitled, "Proposed Minimum Specifications for Body-Worn Camera". [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Uniform and Equipment Specifications Board (UESB) Resolution No. 2024-07-023 dated July 15, 2024 entitled, "Approving the Amendment to UESB Resolution Nos. 2024-02-010, 2024-03-013 and 2024-04-015 entitled, "Proposed Minimum Technical Specifications for Body-Worn Camera"; [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. UESB Resolution No. 2024-04-015 dated April 4, 2024 entitled, "Approving the Amendment to UESB Resolution Nos. 2024-02-010 and 2024-03-013 entitled, "Proposed Minimum Technical Specifications for Body-Worn Camera"; [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. UESB Resolution No. 2024-03-013 dated March 12, 2024 entitled, "Approving the Addendum to UESB Resolution No. 2024-02-010 entitled, "Proposed Minimum Technical Specifications for Body-Worn Camera" [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. UESB Resolution No. 2024-02-010 dated February 23, 2024 entitled, "Approving the Proposed Minimum Technical Specifications for Body Worn Camera" [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles