Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning for Improving Students’ Performance in Grade X Biology in Orong Central School

This study investigated the effectiveness of the cooperative learning method in improving the academic performance of Class X students and developing competencies that can be applied across different subjects and real-life situations at Orong Central School. A mixed-method approach was used in the study. The quantitative component involved analysing students’ academic achievement before and after the implementation of cooperative learning. Data were collected from 50 Class X students and three teachers. Students’ academic results from the second term of 2024 (before the use of cooperative learning) were obtained from school records and compared with their results from the first term of 2023 after the implementation of cooperative learning. The qualitative component included students’ and teachers’ perceptions of cooperative learning gathered through questionnaires and teacher interviews. The findings revealed that students showed strong interest in collaborating with peers and were actively engaged in the teaching–learning process, rather than relying solely on the teacher. Students reported increased confidence in sharing ideas, presenting group findings, and supporting one another during discussions. Cooperative learning also encouraged students to recognise diverse perspectives, thereby enhancing their critical thinking, creativity, and problem-solving abilities. The study concluded that cooperative learning promotes active participation, effective communication, and collaborative problem-solving among students. It is therefore recommended that cooperative learning strategies be integrated into classroom instruction to enhance students’ academic achievement and develop essential life skills.

cooperative learning method, biology

1. Adunola, O. (2011). The Impact of Teachers’ Teaching Methods on the Academic Performance of Primary School Pupils in Ijebu-Ode Local Government Area of Ogun State. Ego Booster Books, Ogun State, Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Almashijari, A. K. (2013). The Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning on EFL Proficiency : A Case Study of Grade Ten Female Classroom in the Newly Developed High School Project in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alrayah, H. (2018). The Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning Activities in Enhancing EFL Learners ’ Fluency. 11(4), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n4p21 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ayeni, A. J. (2011). Teachers' Professional Development and Quality Assurance in Nigerian Secondary Schools. World Journal of Education, 1(2), 143–149. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (2006). Research in Education (A. E. Burvikovs & K. Hopkins (eds.); Tenth Edit). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Buchs, C., Filippou, D., Pulford, E., & Volpé, Y. (2022). Cooperative learning and student motivation: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 34(3), 1231–1255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09645-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cahyani, N. P. I., Suarsana, I. M., & Mahayukti, G. A. (2021). Improving Students’ Mathematical Problem-Solving Skills Through Relating-Experiencing-Applying-Cooperating-Transferring Learning Strategy and Graphic Organizer. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Science, Technology, Engineering and Industrial Revolution (ICSTEIR 2020), 536(Icsteir 2020), 337–344. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210312.056 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Campbell, M. A. (2015). The Effects of the 5E Learning Cycle Model on Students’ Understanding of Force and Motion Concepts. Thesis, 1, 1–146. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Crider, J. C. (2013). The 5E Learning Cycle VS. Traditional Teaching Methods and How They Affect Student Achievement, Interest, and Engagement in a Third Grade Science Classroom. Montana State University, July. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Dong, A., Jong, M. S., & King, R. B. (2020). How Does Prior Knowledge Influence Learning Engagement ? The Mediating Roles of Cognitive Load and Help-Seeking. 11(October), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591203 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Dorji, P., & Tenzin, J. (2021). Application of Kagan’s Cooperative Learning Structures to Maximize Student Application of Kagan’s Cooperative Learning Structures to Maximize Student Engagement : An Action Research. June. https://doi.org/10.9734/JESBS/2021/v34i330317 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Faustino, A., & Muneja, M. S. (2020). Effect of Cooperative Learning on Students ’ Achievements in Literature in English Subject : A Case of Dodoma City, Tanzania. 1(3), 68–76. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46606/eajess2020v01i03.0044 Effect [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Gillies, R. M. (2020). Cooperative learning: Review of research and practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 45(3), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2020v45n3.3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Harpe, S. E. (2015). How to analyze Likert and other rating scale data. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 7(6), 836–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2015.08.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Khalid, A., & Azeem, M. (2012). Constructivist Vs Traditional : Effective instructional approach in teacher education. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(5), 170–177. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kiarie, S. M. (2016). Effects of Teachers ’ Perceptions On Students ’ Perceptions and Achievement in Environmental Education in Secondary School Biology in Gilgil Sub-County, Nakuru County, Kenya. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(12), 5736–5761. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kibui, P. G. (2012). A Critique of the Contribution of Constructivist Learning Approaches to The Development of Critical Thinking. http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/handle/11295/10472 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kivunja, A. C., Ahmed, A., & Kuyini, B. (2017). Understanding and Applying Research Paradigms in Educational Contexts. 6(5), 26–41. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n5p26 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Li, M., & Chen, J. (2025). Collaborative learning and student performance: Evidence from secondary education. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1655913. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1655913 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. McNally, B., Chipperfield, J., Dorsett, P., Del Fabbro, L., Frommolt, V., Goetz, S., Lewohl, J., Molineux, M., Pearson, A., Reddan, G., Roiko, A., & Rung, A. (2017). Flipped classroom experiences: student preferences and flip strategy in a higher education context. Higher Education, 73(2), 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0014-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Ministry of Education. (2017). 31st Educational Policy Guidelines and Instructions (EPGI) 2013-2017. In the Policy and Planning Division, Ministry of Education, Thimphu , Bhutan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Ministry of Education (MoE). (2014). Bhutan Education Blueprint. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Nyandwi, A. (2017). BASING ON COOPERATIVE LEARNING GROUPS FOR IMPROVING LEARNERS ’ PERFORMANCE IN BIOLOGY. Case study senior One ( S 1 ) Ordinary Level ( 0 ’ Level ) at Groupe Scolaire Mburabuturo. 0–66. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. OECD. (2023). Student engagement and collaborative learning: Trends and implications for education. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/education-2023-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Ozcan, T., Yildirim, O., & Ozgur, S. (2012). Alternative conceptions about Mitosis and Meiosis. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3677–3680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.126 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Pesman, H. (2012). Method-approach interaction: the effects of learning cycle vs traditional and contextual vs non-contextual instruction on 11th grade students’ achievement in and attitudes towards physics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Rabgay, T. (2018). The Effect of Using Cooperative Learning Method on Tenth Grade Students ’ Learning Achievement and Attitude towards Biology. 11(2), 265–280. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Roseth, C. J., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2019). Promoting early adolescents’ achievement and peer relationships through cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 145(8), 738–769. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000201 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Royal Education Council & Education Initiatives. (2010). Bhutan’s annual status of student learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Said, I., Alwahaibi, H., Abdul, D., Yahya, M., Lumpur, K., Ali, H., Alkharusi, T., Planning, H. E., & Board, C. (2020). Cypriot Journal of Educational Cohen’s criteria for interpreting practical significance indicators : Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 15(2), 246–258. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Sherab, K. (2013). Strategies for encouraging behavioural and cognitive engagement of pre-service student-teachers in Bhutan: An action research case study. Educational Action Research, 21(2), 164–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2013.789710 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Sijali, K. K. (2017). Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning For Improving Learners ’ Proficiency Level of English Language in Secondary Level Education in Nepal. 22(1), 13–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Singay. (2020). An Investigation into Using the Kagan Cooperative Learning Model to Enhance English Oral Communication Ability of Bhutanese Students. 59(June). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Tebabal, A., & Kahssay, G. (2011). The effects of a student-centred approach on improving students’ graphical interpretation skills and conceptual understanding of kinematic motion. Lat. Am. J. Phy. Edu, 5(2), 374–381. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Tenzin, S., Kinley, & Wangchuk, T. (2021). Effect of 5E learning cycle to enhance grade twelve students’ conceptual understanding of gene expression: An integrated STEM education approach. In STEM Education from Asia: Trends and Perspectives (Issue December, pp. 164–180). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003099888-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Tran, V. D. (2024). The effects of cooperative learning on students’ academic achievement and knowledge retention: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Research, 124, 102200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102200 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Zhang, L., Wang, Y., & Li, X. (2025). Effects of cooperative learning on academic achievement: A meta-analysis study. Current Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-08943-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Problem-Based Learning Strategy: Effect on Achievement of Genetics among Biology Students in Colleges of Education Oyo, Oyo State
• Gut Content Analysis of Siganus canaliculatus (Danggit)
• Predicting Human Neurotherapeutic Response through Preclinical Imaging Intelligence
• Can Algicidal Bacteria be the Solution to Successfully Manage Freshwater Algal Blooms?
• Boosting Carbon Capture: Progress in Enhancing RuBisCO’s Carboxylase Activity