Effectiveness of Inclusionary Zoning Policies in Transit-Oriented Development Areas: A Comparative Analysis of Kuala Lumpur and Selangor
Authors
Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Malaysia)
Centre for Real Estate Studies, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Malaysia)
Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Malaysia)
Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Malaysia)
Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Malaysia)
Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Malaysia)
Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Malaysia)
Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Malaya (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10230008
Subject Category: Real Estate
Volume/Issue: 10/23 | Page No: 81-99
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-05-06
Accepted: 2026-05-12
Published: 2026-05-28
Abstract
Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) has become a key urban planning strategy in Malaysian metropolitan areas, yet housing affordability remains a critical challenge as property values often rise beyond middle and lower-income households' reach. This study examines how inclusionary zoning (IZ) policies address this affordability gap by comparing Kuala Lumpur's voluntary Residensi Wilayah approach with Selangor's mandatory Rumah Selangorku 3.0 framework. Using a comparative case study methodology analysing secondary data from four TOD areas (MRT Titiwangsa, MRT Taman Tun Dr Ismail, MRT Jalan Reko, and MRT Bandar Tun Hussein Onn), the research evaluates policy effectiveness across three distinct analytical layers: policy design, implementation outcomes, and market context. Findings reveal that mandatory IZ policies create stronger foundations for affordable housing provision than voluntary approaches. Kuala Lumpur's voluntary policy resulted in affordable housing located 0.6 to 4.0 km from transit stations, while Selangor's mandatory approach achieved better integration of diverse price points within developments. However, both regions face implementation challenges including insufficient enforcement, lack of location requirements, and affordability thresholds that remain inaccessible to target households. The study recommends, in order of feasibility, strengthening mandatory requirements with robust monitoring, introducing maximum transit-distance rules, reducing reliance on alternative compliance, recalibrating affordability thresholds, and enhancing transparency in implementation reporting.
Keywords
Inclusionary Zoning, Transit-Oriented Development, Affordable Housing, Urban Planning, Land Administration and Development
Downloads
References
1. Abd Aziz, W. N. A. W., Hanif, N. R., Aini, A. M., & Yaacob, M. A. (2018). Housing policy in Malaysia: Bridging the affordability gap for medium-income households. In Housing Policy, Wellbeing and Social Development in Asia (pp. 123-138). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Ali, L., Nawaz, A., Iqbal, S., Aamir Basheer, M., Hameed, J., Albasher, G., ... & Bai, Y. (2021). Dynamics of transit oriented development, role of greenhouse gases and urban environment: a study for management and policy. Sustainability, 13(5), 2536. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Azlan, M. H., Zainudin, A. Z., Rahmat, N., Azmi, F. A. M., Berahim, N., Samsudin, S., ... & Harumain, Y. A. S. (2025). Inclusionary Zoning as a Tool for Social Sustainability: A Systematic Review of Urban Housing Policy Outcomes. Sustainable Futures, 100648. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Baker, D. M. (2016). Building inclusive neighborhoods: assessing the socio-spatial implications of transit-oriented development in St. Louis, Missouri (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Calthorpe, P. (1993). The next American metropolis: Ecology, community, and the American dream. Princeton Architectural Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Carvalho, N. (2021). Private Market Solutions to Private Market-Induced Problems: The Limits of Inclusionary Zoning in Toronto. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Chang, N. (2009). Inclusionary zoning for the provision of affordable housing: A comparative analysis of Vancouver and San Francisco. School of Urban & Regional Planning, Queen’s University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Chava, J., & Newman, P. (2016). Stakeholder deliberation on developing affordable housing strategies: Towards inclusive and sustainable transit-oriented developments. Sustainability, 8(10), 1024. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Fang, Q., Inoue, T., Li, D., Liu, Q., & Ma, J. (2023). Transit-oriented development and sustainable cities: a visual analysis of the literature based on CiteSpace and VOSviewer. Sustainability, 15(10), 8223. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Fischer, P., & Patton, J. (2001). Expanding Housing Options through Inclusionary Zoning. Ideas at Work, 3, 1-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Gold, A. R. (2016). Inclusionary Housing: The Impact of Program Flexibility on Program Success (Doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Khazanah Research Institute. (2015). Making Housing Affordable. Kuala Lumpur: Khazanah Research Institute. https://www.krinstitute.org/assets/contentMS/img/template/editor/_FI [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. NAL_Full_Draft__KRI_-_Making_Housing_Affordable__with_hyperlink__220815%20( [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. 1).pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Li, F., & Guo, Z. (2020). Will mandatory inclusionary housing create mixed-income communities? Evidence from London, UK. Housing Policy Debate, 30(6), 972-993. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Mohd Abdul Kadir, J., Subramaniam, G., & Ghazali, I. (2020). Housing affordability among middle-income earners in Selangor, Malaysia. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 5(15), 289-293. https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v5i15.2514 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Muhammad, A. A., Burhan, B. B. H., & Safian, E. E. B. M. (2024). Price Model for Transit-Oriented Developments in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Real Estate Management and Valuation, 32(3), 20-30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Mukhija, V., Das, A., Regus, L., & Tsay, S. S. (2015). The tradeoffs of inclusionary zoning: what do we know and what do we need to know?. Planning Practice and Research, 30(2), 222-235. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Mukhija, V., Regus, L., Slovin, S., & Das, A. (2010). Can inclusionary zoning be an effective and efficient housing policy? Evidence from Los Angeles and Orange Counties. Journal of Urban Affairs, 32(2), 229-252. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Nasir, Z. A. (2022). The effects of macroeconomics policies on housing affordability in Malaysia (Doctoral dissertation, Thesis. Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Osman, M.M., Shuid, S., Bachok, S., & Khalid, N. (2017). Factors influencing housing prices among local people: a study in Perak, Malaysia. Advanced Science Letters, 23(1), 165-168. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Read, D. C. (2009). The structure and potential economic effects of inclusionary zoning ordinances. Real Estate Issues, 34(2), 1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Schuetz, J., Meltzer, R., & Been, V. (2007). The Effects of Inclusionary Zoning on Local Housing Markets: Lessons from the San Francisco, Washington, DC, and Suburban Boston Areas. Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy (New York University): Working Paper, 07-05. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Stacy, C. P., Morales-Burnett, J., Noble, O., Hodge, T., & Komarek, T. (2021). Inclusionary Zoning: How Different IZ Policies Affect Tenant, Landlord, and Developer Behaviors. Urban Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Tan, T. H. (2020). Housing Affordability in Kuala Lumpur: A Critical Review. Journal of Urban Development, 32(1), 14-28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Yap, J. B. H., Chua, C. Y., & Skitmore, M. (2021). Towards sustainable mobility with transit-oriented development (TOD): understanding greater Kuala Lumpur. Planning Practice & Research, 36(3), 314-336. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Yusoff, I., Ng, B. K., & Azizan, S. A. (2021). Towards sustainable transport policy framework: A rail-based transit system in Klang Valley, Malaysia. PloS one, 16(3), e0248519. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Zainal, A. (2019). Transit-Oriented Development in Malaysia: An Assessment of the Current State and Future Potential. International Journal of Urban Planning, 45(3), 33-45. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Analysis of Housing Deficit in Urban Cities: A Case Study of Port Harcourt
- Selection Factors for Security Service Companies in Strata Schemes in Malaysia
- Greed, Grievance, and Guns: A Resource-Driven Conflict in Zimbabwe's Mining Communities - A Case Study of Marange Diamond Mines
- Public Acceptance of Durian Farmland Real Estate Investment Via Crowdfunding in Malaysia
- Students’ Perceptions on Value-Added the Islamic Estate Planning Course in Real Estate Education