Effectiveness of Performance Contract Planning in Enhancement of Development of Physical Infrastructure in Public Technical Training Institutions in Kenya: A Study Across Technical Training Institutes in Kakamega County.

Authors

Kennedy Machacha Wichenje

Faculty of Education, Tom Mboya University (Kenya)

Enose M.W. Simatwa

Faculty of Education, Tom Mboya University (Kenya)

Solomon Esokomi Nuni

Faculty of Education, Tom Mboya University (Kenya)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100500315

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/5 | Page No: 4624-4651

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-05

Accepted: 2026-05-11

Published: 2026-05-30

Abstract

The government of Kenya invests heavily in Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET). This has necessitated signing Performance Contracts to ensure that the resources allocated to TVET institutions are prudently utilized to achieve the intended goals. Infrastructure development in TVET institutions is critical for trainees to develop the desired competences fully. The objective of the study was to examine the effectiveness of Performance Contract (PC) planning in enhancing development of physical infrastructure. The Context, Input, Process and Product (CIPP) evaluation model by Daniel L. Stufflebeam (1966) was used to examine the effectiveness of performance contract planning in enhancing the development of physical infrastructure in public TVET institutions in Kenya. The study established that while Performance Contracts planning was effective in instilling accountability and providing a sense of institutional direction, its effectiveness in driving tangible infrastructure development was undermined by limited inclusivity of stakeholders, poor alignment with available resources, and unrealistic ambition. Quantitatively, 25 of 30 projects (83%) reviewed by PC Coordinators were executed with alignment to both strategic priorities and available resources, while 5 projects (17%) experienced partial alignment due to funding delays or internal resource limitations. This aligns with observed implementation outcomes, where Government of Kenya funded projects had higher completion rates (average evaluation score 82%) than internally funded projects (average evaluation score 50%). Performance Contracting planning were effective in setting strategic intentions and producing comprehensive documents however, the processes were weakened by poor feasibility assessment. The study concluded that Performance Contracting in enhancing development of physical infrastructure was effective as more than 80% of the infrastructure targets were achieved. The study recommended Planning, that mandate structured consultation with principals, Heads of Departments, technical staff, and implement make it a requirement that all planning processes incorporate feasibility studies and audits of available financial, technical, and human resources, thereby reducing the likelihood of stalled or partially completed projects. The findings of the study are significant to the Government of Kenya Policy Formulation and review in Performance Contracting, Principals of public Technical Training Institutes who make proposals and Researchers in related fields by providing baseline information.

Keywords

Effectiveness, Performance Contract Planning, enhancement, development, Physical Infrastructure Public Technical Training Institutions

Downloads

References

1. Agyemang, F. G. (2018). Challenges of performance contracting in public institutions in Ghana. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(12), 989–998. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1373490 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aguinis, H. (2019b). Performance Management for Dummies. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Performance+Management+For+Dummies-p-9781119694528 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Armstrong, M., & Baron, A. (2005). Managing performance: Performance management in action. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. https://www.cipd.co.uk/knowledge/fundamentals/people/performance [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Court, C. (2010). Performance contracting in Kenya: History, development and lessons. Nairobi: African Centre for Economic Growth. https://www.undp.org/kenya. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Creswell, J.W. and Poth, C.N. (2018) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design Choosing among Five Approaches. 4th Edition, SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Daristu, E. (2022). Performance Contracting and Service Delivery in County Governments in Kenya: A Case study of Kakamega County (Doctoral dissertation, .https://repo.pacuniversity.ac.ke/handle/123456789/3651.3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (2019). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2095101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Government of Kenya (GoK). (2020). Vision 2030: Medium-term plan III (2018–2022). Nairobi: Ministry of Devolution and Planning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. ILO (2022). Annual Evaluation Report. Geneva: ILO office. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Khatete, I. (2020). Monitoring and evaluation of teacher effectiveness, a case of teacher performance appraisal and development tool in public secondary schools in Nyandarua South Sub-County, Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, university of Nairobi). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kinyanjui, H. W., & Wambua, P. P. 2020. Performance management practices, organization structure and service delivery. Journal of Human Resource and Leadership, 51, 1-14 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kusek, J. Z., & Rist, R. C. (2019). Ten steps to a results-based monitoring and evaluation system. World Bank Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kusek, J. Z., & Rist, R. C. (2004).Ten steps to a results-based monitoring and evaluation system. Washington, DC: World Bank.https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/14926 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2019). The development of goal setting theory: A half-century retrospective. Motivation Science, 5(2), 93-105. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000127\ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Mackay, K. (2021). Evaluating public sector performance: Concepts, methods, and tools. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Mati, A., Gichohi, M., & Moguche, A. (2020). The role of target setting in influencing employee productivity in commercial banks in Meru County, Kenya. African Journal of Emerging Issues, 2(4), 22 - 32. http://repository.kemu.ac.ke/handle/123456789/943 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Morse J.M. (1994). Designing Funded Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, Inc. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1994-98625-012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Mugisha, F., & Basheka, B. C. (2020). Performance contracting in public universities in Uganda: Achievements and challenges. African Journal of Public Administration, 9(2), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Muriithi, P., & Wanjiku, R. (2020). Performance contracting and infrastructure development in Kenyan TVET institutions. Kenya Journal of Technical Education, 5(1), 15–32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Mutua, J., & Muema, E. (2019). Challenges in implementing performance contracts in Kenyan TVET institutions. Journal of Education and Practice, 10(14), 56–64. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/47747 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Nyaga, C. (2022). The role of principals in performance contracting in secondary schools in Kenya. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(12), 31–37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. OECD. (2020). Public sector performance: A global perspective. Paris: OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. https://www.oecd.org/gov/performance-management-and-governance/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Osei-Tutu, E., & Asare, R. (2021). Stakeholder participation and performance contract outcomes in Ghanaian public institutions. Public Management Review, 23(9), 1358–1377. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1848265 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Otieno, P., & Wambua, P. (2021a). Assessing the effectiveness of performance contracts in Kenyan technical training institutions. East African Journal of Education, 18(1), 102–120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Otieno, R., & Wambua, P. (2021b). Effectiveness of performance contracts in enhancing service delivery in Kenyan public institutions. Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research, 13(2), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.5897/JPAPR2021.0498 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Republic of Kenya (2024).Performance Contracting Guidelines for the FY 2024/2025 (21st cycle). Government printer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. UNDP (2020). Unified Budget Results and Accountability Framework (UBRAF) 2016-2021. Switzerland. UNAIDS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. UNESCO (2022). Global education monitoring report 2022: gender report, deepening the debate on those still left behind. Global Education Monitoring Report Team [1382].https://doi.org/10.54676/GXQM9685 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. UNESCO-UNEVOC. (2021). Technical and vocational education and training governance and institutional performance. Bonn: UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Yitzhaky, L., & Bahli, B. (2021). Target setting and firm performance: A review. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 37(3), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v37i3.10375 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. World Bank. (2021). Infrastructure for education: Guidelines for public sector investment projects. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. World Bank. (2018). World development report 2018: Learning to realize education’s promise. Washington, DC: World Bank.https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles