Effectiveness of Professional Development and Support Interventions and Level of Action Research Writing Skills Among Teachers

Authors

Marilou M. Pastores

Master of Arts in Teaching, Major in Social Studies, Graduate School Valencia Colleges (Bukidnon), Inc. Purok 17-A, Hagkol, Valencia City, Bukidnon (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1026EDU0165

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/26 | Page No: 1903-1911

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-03-22

Accepted: 2026-03-28

Published: 2026-04-06

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of professional development and support interventions on the action research writing proficiency of elementary teachers in Dangcagan District, Bukidnon, for SY 2025–2026. Utilizing a descriptive-correlational design with a structured questionnaire administered to selected elementary teachers, data were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, and Pearson r. Results revealed that interventions—including technical training, mentoring, resources, time management, and peer collaboration—were perceived as very highly effective. Consequently, teachers demonstrated high proficiency in research writing, particularly in problem identification. Statistical analysis confirmed a significant positive relationship between support interventions and writing ability, thereby rejecting the null hypothesis. The study concludes that teacher proficiency is a direct result of institutional support, emphasizing that a holistic, multi-pronged environment is vital for transforming practitioners into skilled researchers. Recommendations include institutionalizing administrative relief, providing digital tools, and conducting targeted training on technical literature synthesis to bridge existing academic gaps and foster a sustainable culture of inquiry.

Keywords

Action Research, Professional Development, Institutional Support

Downloads

References

1. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Anzaldo, G. D., & Cudiamat, M. A. (2019). Teachers’ experiences in conducting action research: A phenomenological study. International Journal of Advanced Research and Publications, 3(6), 32–37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Baconga, E. M., & Guno, A. V. (2025). Conducting action research: Difficulties, issues, and challenges of junior high school teachers. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 14(11), 2771–2780. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Borg, S. (2015). Teacher professional development through action research: An option for development. International Journal of Educational Research, 74, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.07.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Corpuz, E. M. (2023). Digital competence and professional development on action research capability of basic education teachers. International Journal of Research Publications, 12(1), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands–resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Docallas, R. A., Reyes, M. L., Santos, J. P., & Cruz, D. R. (2025). Challenges and motivation of teachers in conducting action research. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 15(1), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy. Cambridge Adult Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Tanate, I. G., & Llorente, R. (2025). Teachers' motivations, challenges, and difficulties in action research: A narrative study. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 12(1), 305–320. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Tarraya, R. (2023). The effect of time management on teachers' administrative tasks. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 14(11), 255–269. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Tarraya, R. (2025). The effect of time management on teachers' administrative tasks. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 14(11), 255–269. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Tindowen, D. J. C., Reyes, R. A., & Aquino, M. A. (2019). Challenges teachers encounter when conducting action research. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(3), 622–627. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070302 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles