Electricity Supply and Capital Expenditure in Nigeria: Economic Growth Trajectory

Authors

Dr. Olukotun Monsuru Adedeji

Directorate of Academic Planning, Lagos State University (Nigeria)

Salahudeen, Lukumon Akande

Department of Economics, Lagos State University (Nigeria)

Shoboyede, Olufemi Olaniyi

Roshallom International School, Lagos, Nigeria (Nigeria)

Adebayo, Daniel Orinameh

Directorate of Academic Planning, Lagos State University (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100701184

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/7 | Page No: 17243-17254

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-11

Accepted: 2026-08-16

Published: 2026-08-24

Abstract

ABSTRACT
This study examines the long-run and short-run dynamic relationships between electricity supply, capital infrastructure expenditure, and economic growth trajectory in Nigeria over a 36-year period (1990–2025). Grounded in Endogenous Growth Theory and the Big Push framework, the paper formulates an empirical framework using time-series data compiled from the World Bank Development Indicators, Central Bank of Nigeria, Federal Ministry of Power, and the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission. The methodology applies the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) Bounds Testing approach to cointegration alongside an Unrestricted Error Correction Model (UECM) to evaluate level multipliers and short-run error correction dynamics. The empirical findings confirm a statistically significant long-run cointegrating relationship among real Gross Domestic Product (GDP), installed electricity generation capacity, transmission and distribution losses, electricity access, and public infrastructure capital expenditure (F-statistic = 6.85, exceeding the 1% upper bound threshold). Installed electricity capacity and grid access exhibit strong positive associations with long-term real GDP output, confirming that power expansion serves as a major driver of national economic performance.
However, transmission and distribution losses exceeding 50% of generated output severely curtail short-run growth potential. Furthermore, capital infrastructure expenditure displays lagged productive gains, reflecting severe implementation delays and liquidity bottlenecks within the Nigerian power sector. The Error Correction Term (ECT_{t-1} = -0.2275) indicates a moderate adjustment speed, correcting approximately 22.75% of short-run disequilibrium shocks back to the long-run equilibrium path annually. The paper concludes that expanding generation capacity alone cannot unlock Nigeria's economic growth trajectory unless structural grid inefficiencies and fiscal constraints are decisively addressed. Key policy recommendations call for a focused 'two-agenda' strategy prioritizing power supply and capital infrastructure, aggressive investment in grid transmission modernization under the Presidential Power Initiative, resolving sector liquidity and unmetered customer gaps, and accelerating decentralized off-grid renewable solutions to alleviate enterprise operational overhead.
Keywords: Electricity Supply, Capital Expenditure, Economic Growth Trajectory, ARDL Model, Transmission Losses, Nigeria.

Keywords

Electricity

Downloads

References

1. Abdelsamiea, M., & Mohamed, A. (2025). Power infrastructure as a catalyst for industrialization in emerging economies. Journal of Energy Economics and Development, 18(1), 45-62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adeyinka, O., & Priye, T. (2024). Assessing the impact of public capital expenditure on infrastructure decay in Nigeria: An ARDL approach. African Journal of Economic Policy, 31(2), 112-135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ejitoghene, P., & Barnabas, S. (2022). Economic costs of uncollected and lost power: Implications for small and medium scale enterprises in Nigeria. Energy Policy Research, 14(3), 88-104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Francis, E., & Koginam, B. (2019). Post-privatization evaluation of Nigeria's electricity supply industry: Financial and technical constraints. Journal of African Business and Economic Studies, 22(4), 201-218. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3-42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Nathan, I., Chukwu, C., & Okafor, K. (2024). System disturbances and grid stability: Strategies for power sector reform in West Africa. Global Journal of Electrical and Energy Systems, 29(1), 77-94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Oliver, G. (2025). Infrastructure capacity, grid resilience, and macroeconomic performance in Sub-Saharan Africa. African Development Review, 37(1), 15-31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Peter, A. (2026). Liquidity crisis and metering gaps in the Nigerian electricity supply industry: Policy implications for 2025 and beyond. Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies, 68(1), 54-79. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Rim, C. (2021). Power sector reforms and economic growth bottlenecks in developing nations: The Nigerian experience. Journal of Infrastructure and Economic Development, 12(2), 140-158. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002-1037. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Rosenstein-Rodan, P. N. (1943). Problems of industrialisation of Eastern and South-Eastern Europe. The Economic Journal, 53(210/211), 202-211. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65-94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Timilsina, G. R., Kurdgelashvili, L., & Narbel, P. A. (2023). Energy infrastructure capacity expansion and long-term economic growth: A global cross-country panel empirical analysis. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 9812. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Yusuf, M. (2026). Captive power generation and enterprise competitiveness: Empirical evidence from Nigerian manufacturing hubs. Journal of African Development Studies, 19(2), 99-117. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles