Embodied Faith and Marginalized Motherhood: Decolonial Insights into Iddah through Interpretative Phenomenology

This study examines the lived experiences of Muslim single mothers in Coimbatore who observe Iddah, the mandatory waiting period prescribed in Islamic law after divorce or widowhood. While Iddah has been widely discussed in theological and jurisprudential contexts, limited attention has been paid to how women themselves negotiate this practice in everyday life, particularly when they are single mothers balancing faith, livelihood, and motherhood. The research is grounded in Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) and informed by a decolonial perspective, seeking to highlight women’s voices as authoritative sources of knowledge rather than subjects of external interpretation. Fifteen Muslim single mothers, aged between 23 and 40 years, were selected for the study. The sample included both employed and unemployed women, representing diverse socio-economic backgrounds. In-depth interviews were conducted, allowing participants to reflect on the spiritual, social, and economic dimensions of Iddah. Thematic analysis revealed four major themes: (i) faith as a source of strength and struggle, (ii) gendered expectations and community stigma, (iii) economic survival during Iddah, and (iv) Decolonial reinterpretations of faith and agency. The findings indicate that while Iddah imposes certain restrictions, participants also view it as a meaningful spiritual practice that provides emotional healing and resilience. At the same time, community surveillance and economic pressures exacerbate their marginalization as single mothers. By foregrounding women’s narratives, this research challenges orientalist and patriarchal readings of Iddah, offering decolonial insights into how faith is embodied, negotiated, and reinterpreted in the lives of marginalized Muslim mothers.

Iddah, Muslim single mother, Interpretative Phenomenological Approach

1. Ahmed, L. (1992). Women and gender in Islam: Historical roots of a modern debate. Yale University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ahmed, S. (2014). The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ali, K. (2016). Sexual ethics and Islam: Feminist reflections on Qur'an, hadith, and jurisprudence. Oneworld Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ammerman, N. T. (2016). Lived religion as an emerging field: An assessment of its contours and frontiers. Nordic Journal of Religion and Society, 29(2), 83–99. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ano, G. G., & Vasconcelles, E. B. (2005). Religious coping and psychological adjustment to stress: A meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(4), 461–480. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ano, G. G., & Vasconcelles, E. B. (2005). Religious coping and psychological adjustment to stress: A meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(4), 461–480. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Asad, T. (2003). Formations of the secular: Christianity, Islam, modernity. Stanford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Barlas, A. (2019). Believing women in Islam: Unreading patriarchal interpretations of the Qur'an. University of Texas Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bowen, J. R. (2012). A new anthropology of Islam. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bucar, E. M. (2015). Pious fashion: How Muslim women dress. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Chatterjee, P. (1993). The nation and its fragments: Colonial and postcolonial histories. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Chatterjee, P. (1993). The nation and its fragments: Colonial and postcolonial histories. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Chen, M. A. (2016). The informal economy: Recent trends, future directions. New Solutions: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy, 26(2), 155–172. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. De Souza, R. (2017). Widowhood and isolation in South Asian communities: Negotiating silence and stigma. Journal of Gender Studies, 26(5), 567–582. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Fletcher, S. (2023). Lived religion and everyday practice. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 38(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537903.2023.xxxxx [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Pantheon Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Pantheon Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, (25/26), 56–80. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Galanter, M. (1989). Law and society in modern India. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Galanter, M. (1989). Law and society in modern India. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Hjarvard, S. (2020). The mediatization of religion: A theory of the media as agents of religious change. Nordicom Review, 41(1), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2020-xxxx [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Ives, J., & Kidwell, J. (2019). Gender, embodiment, and religious practice: Rethinking lived religion. Sociology of Religion, 80(3), 356–375. https://doi.org/10.1093/socrel/srzxxx [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Jenkins, K., Meyer, C., & Thomas, R. (2018). Women, faith, and structural constraints: Reassessing lived religion. Religion and Society, 9(1), 72–90. https://doi.org/10.3167/arrs.2018.0901xx [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Kabeer, N. (2015). Gender, labour, and livelihoods. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Koenig, H. G. (2012). Religion, spirituality, and health: The research and clinical implications. ISRN Psychiatry, 2012, 278730. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Koenig, H. G. (2012). Religion, spirituality, and health: The research and clinical implications. ISRN Psychiatry, 2012, 278730. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Mahmood, S. (2005). Politics of piety: The Islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Mahmood, S. (2005). Politics of piety: The Islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Mahmood, S. (2005). Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Mahmood, S. (2011). Politics of piety: The Islamic revival and the feminist subject (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Mahmood, S. (2011). Politics of piety: The Islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Mernissi, F. (1991). The veil and the male elite: A feminist interpretation of women’s rights in Islam. Perseus Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Mignolo, W. (2018). On decoloniality: Concepts, analytics, praxis. Duke University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Mignolo, W. D. (2011). The darker side of western modernity: Global futures, decolonial options. Duke University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Osella, F., & Osella, C. (2008). Islamic reform in South India. Modern Asian Studies, 42(2–3), 247–275. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Pargament, K. I. (1997). The psychology of religion and coping: Theory, research, practice. Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Pargament, K. I. (1997). The psychology of religion and coping: Theory, research, practice. Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Park, C. L. (2010). Making sense of the meaning literature: An integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 257–301. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Park, C. L. (2010). Making sense of the meaning literature: An integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 257–301. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Paul Victor, C. G., & Treschuk, J. V. (2020). Resilience in marginalized communities: A scoping review. Journal of Community Psychology, 48(7), 2135–2151. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22397 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Scott, J. C. (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts. Yale University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Ungar, M. (2013). The impact of stigma on child resilience in single-parent households. Child & Family Social Work, 18(2), 142–150. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Wadud, A. (1999). Qur’an and woman: Rereading the sacred text from a woman’s perspective (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Zine, J. (2006). Between Orientalism and fundamentalism: Muslim women and feminist engagement. Muslim World Journal of Human Rights, 3(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.2202/1554-4419.1029 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Zurba, M., & Papadopoulos, A. (2023). Decolonial approaches in community-based research. Community Development Journal, 58(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsac0x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Dynamic of Religious Pluralism and Cultural Identity in Rongmei Naga (Kabui) Society
• Effects of Social-Economic Empowerment of Teenage Mothers and Nurture Care. A Case of Kimbilio Hope Centre, Machakos, Kenya
• Gendering Caste and Casteing Gender: A Study of Social Sickness in Uma Chakravarti’s Gendering Caste: Through a Feminist Lens
• Counselling as Social Work for Women Empowerment in Akwa Ibom State: A Case Study of Ibiono Ibom Local Government Area. Implications for Counsellors
• Motherhood: Inclusion and Containment, A Case Study