Empowering Performance: How Motivation and Training Drive Excellence in Klang Valley Employees
Authors
Department of Social Science, Faculty of Education and Social Sciences, Universiti Selangor (Malaysia)
Institute of Electoral Studies and Advancement of Democracy (IESAD), Universiti Selangor (Malaysia)
Department of Social Science, Faculty of Education and Social Sciences, Universiti Selangor (Malaysia)
Department of Social Science, Faculty of Education and Social Sciences, Universiti Selangor (Malaysia)
Department of Social Science, Faculty of Education and Social Sciences, Universiti Selangor (Malaysia)
Department of Social Science, Faculty of Education and Social Sciences, Universiti Selangor (Malaysia)
Puteri Farahdiana Megat Suhaimi
Department of Social Science, Faculty of Education and Social Sciences, Universiti Selangor (Malaysia)
Department of Social Science, Faculty of Education and Social Sciences, Universiti Selangor (Malaysia)
Department of Social Science, Faculty of Education and Social Sciences, Universiti Selangor (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10100332
Subject Category: Psychology
Volume/Issue: 10/1 | Page No: 4286-4293
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-01-19
Accepted: 2026-01-24
Published: 2026-02-05
Abstract
This study examines the influence of intrinsic motivation and job training on employee performance among employees in the Klang Valley, Malaysia. The main objective is to determine the extent to which these two factors contribute to employee performance and to identify which serves as the stronger predictor. A quantitative research design was adopted, involving 441 employees from various organizations in Klang Valley. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire measuring intrinsic motivation, job training, and employee performance, with all reliability coefficients exceeding 0.70, indicating strong internal consistency. Inferential analyses were employed to test the research hypotheses. The Independent Sample T-Test results revealed no significant differences between the groups in terms of motivation (p = 0.443), training (p = 0.931), and performance (p = 0.312), indicating that both groups shared similar experiences and perceptions. Further regression analysis showed that both intrinsic motivation and job training had a significant positive influence on employee performance, with job training emerging as the stronger predictor. This finding suggests that employees who receive adequate and continuous training tend to perform better and demonstrate higher engagement levels. The study contributes to the understanding of human resource development by highlighting the importance of integrating motivation and training programs to enhance employee performance. Organizations in Klang Valley are encouraged to prioritize continuous learning and motivational strategies as part of their workforce development initiatives to achieve sustainable organizational growth.
Keywords
Intrinsic motivation, job training, employee performance, klang valley
Downloads
References
1. Abdul Halim, M., Rahman, A. A., & Yusof, N. F. (2023). The Abdul Halim, N., Rahman, A., & Yusuf, H. (2023). On-the-job training and performance improvement among Malaysian service employees. Journal of Management and Training Studies, 11(2), 55–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Abdullah, N., Rahman, S., & Yusof, R. (2023). Training programs and digital adaptation in Malaysia’s service sector. Journal of Human Resource Development, 15(2), 88–102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Adula, A., Gebremariam, T., & Meles, B. (2023). Employee training and job satisfaction in service organizations. Human Resource Journal of Africa, 12(4), 212–228. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Aguinis, H., & Kraiger, K. (2021). Benefits of training and development for individuals and teams. Annual Review of Psychology, 72(1), 627–652. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Ahmad, M., Ismail, Z., & Razali, N. (2021). The impact of job training on employee performance in Malaysian organizations. Asian Journal of Management Studies, 13(1), 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Anderson, T., White, C., & Lim, J. (2022). Virtual reality training and decision-making in high-risk industries. Journal of Applied Technology, 19(3), 105–120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Andronicus, A., Hassan, M., & Tan, L. (2021). Synergy between motivation and training in employee productivity. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Psychology, 10(2), 64–81. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Armstrong, M., & Taylor, S. (2020). Armstrong’s handbook of human resource management practice (15th ed.). Kogan Page. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Bappah, A., & Inuwa, M. (2023). Training, motivation, and employee performance: A combined approach. Journal of HR and Organizational Development, 14(1), 77–93. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Bataineh, A. (2014). Impact of training on job performance in Jordanian public sector. Journal of Business and Social Science, 5(6), 1–8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Bryan, S. (2021). Intrinsic motivation and employee engagement: A review. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 16(2), 34–46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Chen, L., Zhang, Q., & Lee, D. (2023). Gamified learning and employee engagement in corporate training. International Journal of E-Learning, 18(3), 150–167. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2020). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Motivation Science, 6(2), 93–105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Dessler, G. (2020). Human resource management (16th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Dessler, G. (2021). Fundamentals of human resource management. Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Eke, O. (2023). Performance appraisal and strategic workforce planning. Journal of Business Research and Innovation, 9(2), 45–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2023). Convenience sampling and its implications in research. Journal of Educational Research Methods, 12(1), 14–19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Gagné, M., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2022). Self-determination theory applied to work motivation. Motivation Science, 8(3), 210–224. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2021). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Hashim, N. (2022). Gender and workforce dynamics in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Labour Studies, 9(2), 77–91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2020). Interest, motivation, and engagement in learning. Educational Psychologist, 55(1), 78–89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Howard, J. L., Gagné, M., & Bureau, J. S. (2021). Testing self-determination theory in workplace motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 162, 55–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. HRD Corp. (2022). Training participation statistics 2022. Human Resource Development Corporation Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Hoxha, A., & Ramadani, V. (2024). Intrinsic motivation and contextual performance among employees. Journal of Public Sector Management, 17(1), 98–113. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Iheka, P. (2025). Gender and intrinsic motivation in contemporary workplaces. International Journal of Human Psychology, 14(2), 67–80. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Kandie, J., & Kipsang, K. (2023). Dimensions of employee work performance: Quantity, quality, teamwork, innovation, and autonomy. African Journal of Business Studies, 14(1), 23–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Khalid, H., & Razak, S. (2023). Post-COVID motivation and job security among MNC employees in Malaysia. International Journal of Human Capital Studies, 9(1), 44–57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Khan, A., & Ali, S. (2023). Continuous training and performance sustainability in SMEs. International Journal of Business Performance Management, 20(4), 112–129. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Kong, D., Ong, C., & Lee, J. (2022). Intrinsic motivation and job satisfaction among service employees in Malaysia. Journal of Organizational Behavior Studies, 19(2), 54–72. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C. M., Hildebrandt, V. H., Schaufeli, W. B., de Vet, H. C., & van der Beek, A. J. (2015). Construct validity of the individual work performance questionnaire (IWPQ). Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 57(3), 320–326. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Kumar, R., & Ranjit, P. (2022). Intrinsic motivation, creativity, and job performance: Evidence from Indian retail employees. Asia-Pacific Journal of Organizational Psychology, 7(2), 85–99. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Laily, A., Rahman, Z., & Noor, F. (2024). Employee motivation and performance in Malaysian service sectors. Asian Business Research Journal, 12(1), 33–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Landa, C. (2018). Training practices and employee effectiveness in organizations. International Journal of Management Studies, 6(3), 44–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Latham, G. P., & Locke, E. A. (2018). Goal setting theory: What we have learned and what we need to learn. Motivation Science, 4(2), 93–105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Lestari, N. (2023). Synergistic effects of motivation and training on performance. Journal of Human Capital Management, 13(2), 72–90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. López-Vílchez, M., Peña, J., & Ruiz, L. (2024). Gender equality and intrinsic motivation in organizations. European Journal of Management Studies, 31(1), 22–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Mansor, N., Rozalli, S., & Othman, H. (2021). Work performance measurement and organizational goals. Malaysian Journal of Management Studies, 10(2), 40–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Meyer, J. (2024). Self-improvement and intrinsic learning motivation. Educational Research Review, 19(1), 13–27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Ministry of Human Resources Malaysia. (2022). Industrial Harmony Policy and Employment Act 1955 (Amendment 2022). Putrajaya: Government of Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Mughal, F., Rahman, H., & Qureshi, M. (2025). Understanding work performance dimensions in organizations. Journal of Contemporary Human Resource Research, 17(2), 89–110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2025). Intrinsic motivation and human potential in modern organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology, 12(1), 1–26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Noe, R. A. (2020). Employee training and development (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Norwani, N., Abdullah, R., & Rahman, A. (2024). Gender differences in motivation and job satisfaction among gig workers in Malaysia. Journal of Contemporary Management Research, 18(1), 120–136. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Olafsen, A. H., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2020). Self-determination theory in the workplace. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(3), 263–283. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Wynn, S. R. (2020). The effectiveness and importance of choice in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 896–915. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Reeve, J. (2023). Understanding motivation and emotion (8th ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2022). The science of training and development in organizations. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(2), 74–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2023). Research methods for business students (9th ed.). Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
52. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2022). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (8th ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
53. Shafiee, M., & Abas, Z. (2023). Gender differences in training outcomes among Malaysian employees. Asia-Pacific HRM Review, 11(1), 25–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
54. Sitzmann, T., & Weinhardt, J. (2023). Training effectiveness and employee adaptability: A meta-analysis. Human Resource Development Review, 22(1), 19–38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
55. The Star. (2024, April 14). Gender gaps persist in skilled employment in Malaysia. The Star Online. https://www.thestar.com.my/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
56. Vansteenkiste, M., Ryan, R. M., & Soenens, B. (2025). Intrinsic motivation and basic psychological needs. Annual Review of Psychology, 76(1), 389–416. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
57. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., & Schiefele, U. (2022). Motivation to learn in educational and work settings. Annual Review of Psychology, 73(1), 185–213. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- A Comparative Study of Adjustment Level, Parental Income and Academic Achievement of Adolescent Girls
- Increase in STIs among Adolescents in Masvingo District
- A Correlation between SDG 4 (Quality Education) and Emotional Disposition of Teacher Educators in Hyderabad District
- Ear Piercing Behaviour and Self-Esteem among Male University Students in Nigeria
- A Study of Religiosity and Psychological Well-Being