Empowering SDG 10 at UKM: Bridging Institutional Demands and the Imperative for Inclusive Policy Reform
Authors
Institute of Ethnic Studies (KITA), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (Malaysia)
Centre For Academic Management, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (Malaysia)
Registrar Department, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (Malaysia)
Student Housing Center, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100400105
Subject Category: Social science
Volume/Issue: 10/4 | Page No: 1415-1423
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-04-09
Accepted: 2026-04-14
Published: 2026-04-28
Abstract
Higher Education Institutions are now at a point where institutional inclusivity is both a structural need and an operational requirement to navigate the ever-increasing complexity of diversity within their ecosystems effectively. This paper examines the strategic and practical challenges faced by Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) in promoting Sustainable Development Goal 10 (SDG 10), primarily through creating more inclusive policies that focus on individuals with disabilities (PWDs) and other vulnerable populations within the university community. While UKM has formally stated its commitment to inclusion as part of its sustainability strategic plan 2030, initial evaluation indicates a large gap between formal statements of intent and actual practice, specifically in the deployment of staff resources and the provision of services to support individuals with disabilities. Utilizing a data-driven action research methodology, this study employs policy document analysis, survey and interview data, and a web-based monitoring tool (inclusive dashboard) to assess how effectively existing policy frameworks are being implemented; identify gaps in implementation; and offer more responsive, intersectional, and evidence-driven institutional practices. Preliminary findings indicate that the principal barriers to mainstreaming inclusivity include both the physical/structural barriers to accessibility and ineffective mechanisms for monitoring. This paper suggests a new policy framework, developed collaboratively with key stakeholders across the university, and a live data system that would ensure the principles of social justice are not only recorded but also made transparent and sustainable. This study contributes significantly to the broader literature on academic discourse while offering substantial policy implications for transformative efforts to achieve equity and inclusivity within institutions.
Keywords
inclusivity, institutional policy, SDG 10
Downloads
References
1. Abdullah, N. A., Yusof, H., & Ramli, N. (2019). Inclusive education in Malaysian higher learning institutions: Issues and challenges. Journal of Special Needs Education, 9(1), 1–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Ahmad Sanusi, S. W. S. B., Abu Bakar, N. R. B., & Mohamad Puad, N. A. B. (2025). Boycotting Israeli products as a form of Islamic ethical consumerism: Implications for ESG practices in Malaysia. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(9). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Ayob, M., Mohd Shahren, N., Omar, S. N., Tamrin, M., Abdul Azis, R., & Azis, S. N. (2025). Exploring the influence of sustainability education and campaigns on sustainability awareness among Malaysian university students. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(9). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Fraser, N. (2009). Scales of justice: Reimagining political space in a globalizing world. Columbia University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Jabatan Kebajikan Masyarakat (JKM). (2007). Dasar orang kurang upaya kebangsaan. Kementerian Pembangunan Wanita, Keluarga dan Masyarakat. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Jaringan Orang Kurang Upaya. (2022). Cadangan dasar aksesibiliti institusi pengajian tinggi. Kuala Lumpur: JPOKU. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Jun, L. W., Zabri, S. N., Mohd Kassim, N. S., & Mohamad, S. Y. (2025). Optimizing solar streetlight systems for sustainable urban and community development. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(9). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi. (2011). Garis panduan kemudahan mesra OKU di IPTA. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi. (2021). Pelan strategik pendidikan tinggi OKU. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. UNESCO. (2020). Inclusion and education: All means all – Global Education Monitoring Report 2020. Paris: UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. (2024). Pelan Strategik Kelestarian UKM 2030. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
- Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
- Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
- The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
- Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar