Empowerment of Social Entrepreneurs among Poverished Persons with Disabilities (Asnaf Oku) Through Social Entrepreneurship: A Case Study in Perlis

This study examines the role of social entrepreneurship in empowering social entrepreneurs among Asnaf Persons with Disabilities (OKU) in the state of Perlis, Malaysia. Drawing on the Social Network Empowerment Model and Social Capital Theory, the study investigates how interactions within social networks, access to resources, and participation in social entrepreneurship activities enhance participants’ capacity, agency, and economic independence. This qualitative case study involved seven (7) active Asnaf OKU social entrepreneurs and two (2) officers from the Department of Social Welfare (JKM) Perlis. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, observations, and document analysis, and analyzed using thematic analysis with NVivo 12 software. Findings indicate that social entrepreneurship serves as a crucial channel for the mobilization of social capital, particularly relational and cognitive capital, enabling participants to overcome infrastructural barriers, social stigma, and financial constraints. Interventions from NGOs and support from JKM were instrumental in capacity building and market access. Nevertheless, participants continue to face challenges related to physical mobility, lack of dedicated start-up funding, and bureaucratic procedures. The study suggests that empowerment programs for Asnaf OKU should shift from a paternalistic aid-based model to a community centered social entrepreneurship ecosystem, supported by inclusive policies. The implications highlight the importance of strategic collaboration frameworks among government agencies, NGOs, and the private sector to develop a holistic, sustainable, and effective support system for Asnaf OKU social entrepreneurs.

Social Entrepreneurship, Asnaf Persons with Disabilities (OKU), Empowerment, Social Capital

1. Abd Wahab, N., & Muhammad, F. (2021). Program pembangunan usahawan OKU di Malaysia: Isu dan cabaran. Journal of Business and Social Development, 9(2), 15-28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abu-Saifan, S. (2012). Social entrepreneurship: Definition and boundaries. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(2), 22–27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Angrosino, M. (2007). Doing ethnographic and observational research. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Datta, P. B., Gailey, R., & Rasul, I. (2020). Social entrepreneurship and empowerment of women in rural Bangladesh. Journal of Business Ethics, 165(3), 469–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4083-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Dees, J. G. (2017). The meaning of social entrepreneurship. In Case Studies in Social Entrepreneurship and Sustainability (pp. 34-42). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. DiCicco-Bloom, B., & Crabtree, B. F. (2006). The qualitative research interviews. Medical Education, 40(4), 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Foster-Fishman, P. G., Nowell, B., & Yang, H. (2001). Putting the system back into systems change: A framework for understanding and changing organizational and community systems. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29(2), 197–236. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010376228460 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ghazali, R., Ismail, M. K., & Abdullah, M. Y. (2021). Intersectionality and disability: Multiple burdens of persons with disabilities in Malaysia. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 68(5), 718-732. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2020.1719045 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hassan, A., & Dali, M. (2019). From charity to rights: Rethinking disability policy in Malaysia. International Journal of Public Policy, 16(3/4), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPP.2019.101835 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hassan, N. A., & Dali, N. M. (2019). Challenges of micro-entrepreneurs with disabilities in Malaysia. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 13(2), 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-01-2018-0012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Hassan, N. A., Dali, N. M., & Noor, H. M. (2020). The role of social welfare department in entrepreneurship development among persons with disabilities in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(3), 490–503. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Haugh, H. M., & Talwar, A. (2020). How do social entrepreneurship ventures create shared value? Insights from a comparative case study. Business & Society, 59(8), 1585–1626. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650320928965 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ishak, S., Omar, A. R. C., & Hussin, Z. (2021). Social entrepreneurship as a mechanism for social inclusion of persons with disabilities: A scoping review. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2021.1971855 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Ismail, R., Zainal, H., & Ahmad, N. A. (2021). Social support networks and entrepreneurial success among persons with disabilities in Malaysia. Journal of Social Service Research, 47(4), 497–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2020.1869145 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Khalid, F., Abdullah, S., & Aziz, N. (2020). Empowering marginalized communities: Lessons from Malaysia. Asian Social Work and Policy Review, 14(3), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/aswp.12190 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Khalid, M. S., Othman, M., & Kayat, K. (2020). Zakat and empowerment of asnaf with disabilities: The case of Malaysia. International Journal of Zakat, 5(1), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Mair, J., & Martí, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Mohd Daud, S. N., Abdul Rahman, R., & Ahmad, N. (2023). Socio-economic challenges and community-based solutions in rural Perlis: A qualitative inquiry. Geografia: Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 19(1), 1-15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.533225 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Norris, S., Oppong, T., & Sissoko, A. (2021). Social entrepreneurship in the Global South: A systematic literature review. Social Enterprise Journal, 17(2), 329-351. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-07-2020-0054 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Renko, M., Parker Harris, S., & Caldwell, K. (2016). Entrepreneurial outcomes for people with disabilities: The role of stigma and visibility. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 27(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207315604363 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Saad, M., Abdul Razak, F., & Ahmad, S. (2022). Waqf-based social entrepreneurship for marginalized groups in Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 13(7), 1085–1105. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-05-2021-0145 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Saebi, T., Foss, N. J., & Linder, S. (2019). Social entrepreneurship research: Past achievements and future promises. Journal of Management, 45(1), 70–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318793196 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Sefotho, M. M. (2015). A philosopher's approach to entrepreneurship education for persons with disabilities: A case of blindness. African Journal of Disability, 4(1), Article 131. https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v4i1.131 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Shaffril, M. H. M., Samsuddin, S. F., & Samah, A. A. (2022). Systematic literature review on the socio-economic challenges of persons with disabilities in Southeast Asia. Journal of Disability Research, 1(1), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.57197/JDR-2022-0005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Shakespeare, T. (2014). Disability rights and wrongs revisited (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Soldatic, K., & Meekosha, H. (2012). Disability and neoliberal state formations. In B. Watermeyer, L. Swartz, T. Lorenzo, M. Schneider, & M. Priestley (Eds.), Disability and social change: A South African agenda (pp. 195–210). HSRC Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Yaakob, M. Y., Zainol, F. A., & Hussin, Z. H. (2019). Poverty alleviation among persons with disabilities (PWDs) through zakat assistance: The Malaysian experience. International Journal of Zakat and Islamic Philanthropy, 1(2), 1-10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Zimmerman, M. A. (2000). Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational, and community levels of analysis. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 43–63). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Entrepreneurship and Start-Up Ecosystem Vis-À-Vis Government Start-Up Scheme in Manipur: A Critical Review and a Way Forward
• Building Resilience: How Malaysian Women Entrepreneurs Use Strengths and Resources to Navigate Challenges
• Branding in Digital Entrepreneurship: Evaluating Branding Criteria in IT Entrepreneurship
• Bridging the Intention–Action Gap through Entrepreneurial Optimism: A Conceptual Exploration
• Entrepreneurial Orientation of Undergraduate Students in University Malaysia Perlis: A Conceptual Paper